Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support tape #2

Open
dylang opened this issue Jan 28, 2015 · 58 comments
Open

Support tape #2

dylang opened this issue Jan 28, 2015 · 58 comments

Comments

@dylang
Copy link

dylang commented Jan 28, 2015

https://github.com/isaacs/node-tap
https://github.com/substack/tape

Update: Hi, I'm in a new job now and I've decided to use Jest instead of tape, but I'll leave this ticket open for those who are still interested.

@ArtemGovorov
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the suggestion, will implement tap support in planned node.js runner.

@franleplant
Copy link

+1

@Pentiado
Copy link

Is it planned somewhere in near future? I would really like to switch to Tape, but, well without Wallaby there is no way I would decide to do it. Wallaby is too cool.

@ArtemGovorov
Copy link
Member

@Pentiado I'm planning to have a look into supporting tape in a few weeks.

@NodeGuy
Copy link

NodeGuy commented Jul 21, 2015

👍

Here's a strongly opinionated article about why it's great: Why I use Tape Instead of Mocha & So Should You

@Nembus
Copy link

Nembus commented Jul 30, 2015

I too would love to see Tape support.

@willhoag
Copy link

Yep, I'm a Tape user as well and would love support for it. Thanks!

@geraldyeo
Copy link

Supporting Tape will be awesome!

@TYRONEMICHAEL
Copy link

+1. Very interested as well.

@WRidder
Copy link

WRidder commented Oct 15, 2015

+1 as well

@davegomez
Copy link

Any progress on this or should I install Mocha?

@ArtemGovorov
Copy link
Member

@davegomez we have made some progress, but no ETA yet as there're still a few things to do.

@ArtemGovorov
Copy link
Member

A quick poll: are you using tape for node or for browser tests?

@davegomez
Copy link

I'm currently using it for Node but I would love to use it for browsers too (but the config with PhantomJS and Karma is a pain in the ass).

@Nembus
Copy link

Nembus commented Oct 27, 2015

Browser mostly here.
On Oct 27, 2015 9:50 AM, "David Gómez" notifications@github.com wrote:

I'm currently using it for Node but I would love to use it for browsers
too (but the config with PhantomJS and Karma is a pain in the ass).


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment).

@TYRONEMICHAEL
Copy link

Node.

@willhoag
Copy link

Both

@WRidder
Copy link

WRidder commented Oct 27, 2015

Both as well.

@geraldyeo
Copy link

Both

@baldore
Copy link

baldore commented Oct 29, 2015

Both.

@iclanzan
Copy link

Both

@WRidder
Copy link

WRidder commented Nov 25, 2015

I was wondering whether there are any updates w.r.t. tape support?

Writing tests is much less fun without Wallaby ;)

@ArtemGovorov
Copy link
Member

@WRidder We are close to finish tape for node.js tests support, still a few things to do, but it is getting there.

@WRidder
Copy link

WRidder commented Nov 25, 2015

Awesome! Looking forward to it. Your support is impeccable :)

@eggyal
Copy link

eggyal commented May 24, 2019

Why no support (even experimental) for tape in browser? Are there upstream issues blocking that too?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests