Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make support for linked svg and svgz explicit #39

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2017
Merged

Make support for linked svg and svgz explicit #39

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 13, 2017

Conversation

lucafavatella
Copy link

Please refer to commit message for details.

@lucafavatella lucafavatella changed the title Recognize compressed svg for inlining image WIP Recognize compressed svg for inlining image Jun 9, 2016
@lucafavatella lucafavatella changed the title WIP Recognize compressed svg for inlining image WIP Make support for linked svg and svgs explicit Jun 9, 2016
@lucafavatella lucafavatella changed the title WIP Make support for linked svg and svgs explicit WIP Make support for linked svg and svgz explicit Jun 9, 2016
@lucafavatella lucafavatella changed the title WIP Make support for linked svg and svgz explicit Make support for linked svg and svgz explicit Jun 9, 2016
@lucafavatella
Copy link
Author

I performed these small changes to org-rub (I mentioned svg/svgz, I added absolute links to svg/svgz and I explicated svgs in the code) because I was investigating relative links to svg. Eventually I found github/markup/issues/556 that was the issue I was looking for.

Please let me know how you would like to progress on this pull request #39.

@lucafavatella
Copy link
Author

This PR still makes sense to me.

@vonavi vonavi merged commit 99c42f4 into wallyqs:master Jan 13, 2017
@lucafavatella lucafavatella deleted the inline-svg-image branch January 13, 2017 23:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants