Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Libdev use types #385

Merged
merged 490 commits into from
Jan 27, 2022
Merged

Conversation

mostofi
Copy link
Member

@mostofi mostofi commented Dec 1, 2021

Further preparatory work for library-mode developments. These changes have been made by the team at STFC (Jerome Jackson, Barry Searle, Leon Petit, Martin Plummer). Variables have been organised into coherent Fortran types to shorten argument lists of subroutine calls and improve readability. There are several new files:

In src:

  • types.F90: definition of new types
  • wannier90_types.F90: definition of new types that are specific to the core wannier90 code
  • readwrite.F90: routines for reading parameters and writing output
  • wannier90_readwrite.F90: routines specific to the core wannier90 code for reading parameters and writing output

In src/postw90:

  • postw90_types.F90: definition of new types that are specific to postw90
  • postw90_readwrite.F90: routines specific to the postw90 for reading parameters and writing output

sstgfbc and others added 30 commits May 12, 2021 12:25
…0.x keywords that are not otherwise parsed by wannier90.x, and vice versa)
don't work as they haven't yet been changed by the others
…0-libdev into pw90-common (merge pw90_common changes with updates to get_oper)
…0-libdev into pw90-common

(merge on geninterp changes)
…0-libdev into pw90-common (gyrotropic updates)
pleoluxbg and others added 27 commits October 19, 2021 16:31
We still need to modify the calls to the new subroutines in get_oper
@mostofi mostofi merged commit 465131a into wannier-developers:libdev_use-types Jan 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants