Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removed circuit breaker #1138

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

Removed circuit breaker #1138

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

backsapc
Copy link
Contributor

@backsapc backsapc commented Dec 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved the retry policy for processing new signature requests, now allowing up to 3 attempts with exponential backoff.
  • Chores

    • Removed the circuit breaker logic from the retry policy, simplifying the error handling process.

@backsapc backsapc requested a review from mn13 December 11, 2024 12:14
@backsapc backsapc self-assigned this Dec 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the NewSignatureProcessor class located in newSignatureProcessor.ts. The primary alteration is the removal of the circuit breaker policy that was previously integrated with the retry policy. The retry policy has been simplified to allow a maximum of three attempts with an exponential backoff strategy. The core logic of the handle method remains unchanged, focusing on processing new signature requests and handling transactions.

Changes

File Change Summary
automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/newSignatureProcessor.ts Modified the NewSignatureProcessor class to remove the circuit breaker policy and implement a standalone retry policy with a maximum of 3 attempts and exponential backoff. Core logic in the handle method remains unchanged.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant NewSignatureProcessor
    participant TransactionHandler

    Client->>NewSignatureProcessor: Request new signature
    NewSignatureProcessor->>TransactionHandler: Check for existing transactions
    TransactionHandler-->>NewSignatureProcessor: Return transaction status
    NewSignatureProcessor->>NewSignatureProcessor: Retry logic (up to 3 attempts)
    NewSignatureProcessor-->>Client: Response with signature status
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b58b53 and c5a6f3f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • automated-orders/packages/blockchain-library/src/processors/newSignatureProcessor.ts (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mn13 mn13 merged commit 1a0de7f into main Dec 11, 2024
14 of 17 checks passed
@mn13 mn13 deleted the fix/remove-circuit-breaker branch December 11, 2024 12:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants