feat(spaceward): add some ui updates and buenavista chain #186
Conversation
|
Hey @jjheywood and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼 It looks like you forgot to add a changelog entry for your changes. Make sure to add a changelog entry in the 'CHANGELOG.md' file. |
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe recent updates to the Spaceward project involve significant enhancements across multiple components and configurations. Key changes include the upgrade of Changes
These changes collectively refine the application's functionality and user experience, aligning with ongoing development goals. Recent Review DetailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Files selected for processing (48)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
Additional comments not posted (96)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| // if (type != AddressType.ADDRESS_TYPE_ETHEREUM) { | ||
| // return null; | ||
| // } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commented-out code should be removed if it is no longer needed to keep the codebase clean and maintainable.
- // if (type != AddressType.ADDRESS_TYPE_ETHEREUM) {
- // return null;
- // }Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| // if (type != AddressType.ADDRESS_TYPE_ETHEREUM) { | |
| // return null; | |
| // } |
| // { | ||
| // name: "PancakeSwap", | ||
| // url: "https://pancakeswap.finance/swap?chain=sepolia", | ||
| // logo: "/logos/pancakeswap.svg", | ||
| // description: | ||
| // "Trade, earn, and own crypto on the all-in-one multichain DEX.", | ||
| // }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Commented-out code for PancakeSwap should be removed unless there's a specific reason to keep it for future reference.
| chain_name: "wardenprotocollocal", | ||
| status: "live", | ||
| network_type: "testnet", | ||
| pretty_name: "Warden Protocol (local)", | ||
| chain_id: "wardenprotocol", | ||
| bech32_prefix: "warden", | ||
| daemon_name: "wardend", | ||
| node_home: "$HOME/.warden", | ||
| key_algos: ["secp256k1"], | ||
| slip44: 118, | ||
| fees: { | ||
| fee_tokens: [ | ||
| { | ||
| denom: "uward", | ||
| fixed_min_gas_price: 0.005, | ||
| low_gas_price: 0.01, | ||
| average_gas_price: 0.025, | ||
| high_gas_price: 0.03, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| staking: { | ||
| staking_tokens: [ | ||
| { | ||
| denom: "uward", | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| codebase: { | ||
| git_repo: "https://github.com/warden-protocol/wardenprotocol", | ||
| recommended_version: "v0.1.0", | ||
| compatible_versions: ["v0.1.0"], | ||
| cosmos_sdk_version: "0.50", | ||
| consensus: { | ||
| type: "cometbft", | ||
| version: "0.38", | ||
| }, | ||
| cosmwasm_enabled: false, | ||
| genesis: { | ||
| genesis_url: | ||
| "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/warden-protocol/networks/main/testnet-alfama/genesis.json", | ||
| }, | ||
| versions: [ | ||
| { | ||
| name: "v0.1.0", | ||
| recommended_version: "v0.1.0", | ||
| compatible_versions: ["v0.1.0"], | ||
| cosmos_sdk_version: "0.50", | ||
| consensus: { | ||
| type: "cometbft", | ||
| version: "0.38", | ||
| }, | ||
| cosmwasm_enabled: false, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| apis: { | ||
| rpc: [ | ||
| { | ||
| address: env.rpcURL, | ||
| provider: "Warden Protocol", | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| rest: [ | ||
| { | ||
| address: env.apiURL, | ||
| provider: "Warden Protocol", | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| grpc: [], | ||
| }, | ||
| logo_URIs: { | ||
| png: "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cosmos/chain-registry/master/wardenprotocol/images/ward.png", | ||
| }, | ||
| keywords: ["local"], | ||
| images: [ | ||
| { | ||
| png: "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cosmos/chain-registry/master/wardenprotocol/images/ward.png", | ||
| }, | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The verification process has revealed that the chain_id "wardenprotocol" is used more than once in the spaceward/src/config/chains.ts file. This could lead to potential conflicts or misconfigurations as each chain should ideally have a unique identifier. It is recommended to review and possibly revise the chain configurations to ensure that each chain_id is unique.
Analysis chain
Updated configuration for wardenprotocollocal. Ensure that the chain_id and other parameters are correct as per the network specifications.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that the chain_id 'wardenprotocol' is unique and correctly used in the network configurations
rg --type ts "chain_id: \"wardenprotocol\""
Length of output: 163
| chain_name: "wardenprotocoldevnet", | ||
| status: "live", | ||
| network_type: "testnet", | ||
| pretty_name: "Warden Protocol (devnet)", | ||
| chain_id: "wardenprotocol", | ||
| bech32_prefix: "warden", | ||
| daemon_name: "wardend", | ||
| node_home: "$HOME/.warden", | ||
| key_algos: ["secp256k1"], | ||
| slip44: 118, | ||
| fees: { | ||
| fee_tokens: [ | ||
| { | ||
| denom: "uward", | ||
| fixed_min_gas_price: 0.005, | ||
| low_gas_price: 0.01, | ||
| average_gas_price: 0.025, | ||
| high_gas_price: 0.03, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| staking: { | ||
| staking_tokens: [ | ||
| { | ||
| denom: "uward", | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| codebase: { | ||
| git_repo: "https://github.com/warden-protocol/wardenprotocol", | ||
| recommended_version: "v0.1.0", | ||
| compatible_versions: ["v0.1.0"], | ||
| cosmos_sdk_version: "0.50", | ||
| consensus: { | ||
| type: "cometbft", | ||
| version: "0.38", | ||
| }, | ||
| cosmwasm_enabled: false, | ||
| genesis: { | ||
| genesis_url: | ||
| "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/warden-protocol/networks/main/testnet-alfama/genesis.json", | ||
| }, | ||
| versions: [ | ||
| { | ||
| name: "v0.1.0", | ||
| recommended_version: "v0.1.0", | ||
| compatible_versions: ["v0.1.0"], | ||
| cosmos_sdk_version: "0.50", | ||
| consensus: { | ||
| type: "cometbft", | ||
| version: "0.38", | ||
| }, | ||
| cosmwasm_enabled: false, | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| }, | ||
| apis: { | ||
| rpc: [ | ||
| { | ||
| address: env.rpcURL, | ||
| provider: "Warden Protocol", | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| rest: [ | ||
| { | ||
| address: env.apiURL, | ||
| provider: "Warden Protocol", | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| grpc: [], | ||
| }, | ||
| logo_URIs: { | ||
| png: "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cosmos/chain-registry/master/wardenprotocol/images/ward.png", | ||
| }, | ||
| keywords: ["local"], | ||
| images: [ | ||
| { | ||
| png: "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cosmos/chain-registry/master/wardenprotocol/images/ward.png", | ||
| }, | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The provided script output reveals that the chain_id "wardenprotocol" is used for two different configurations within the same file: wardenprotocollocal and wardenprotocoldevnet. Both configurations are marked as "live" and are of the "testnet" network type. This duplication could potentially lead to conflicts or confusion, as chain_id is typically expected to be unique across different network configurations to ensure correct network identification and operation.
Given this finding, it is advisable to address this issue by either ensuring that each network configuration has a unique chain_id or by clarifying the intent behind using the same chain_id for multiple configurations if this was done intentionally for a specific reason.
Recommendation:
Review and potentially revise the chain_id for either wardenprotocollocal or wardenprotocoldevnet to ensure uniqueness across network configurations. This change will help prevent any operational conflicts or confusion in network identification.
Analysis chain
Configuration for wardenprotocoldevnet appears consistent with the local settings. Double-check the chain_id to ensure it does not conflict with other network configurations.
The output from the executed script indicates that the chain_id "wardenprotocol" appears twice within the same file spaceward/src/config/chains.ts. This suggests a potential issue with duplicate chain_id entries within the same configuration file, which could lead to conflicts or misconfigurations if these entries are meant to represent different network configurations.
To further investigate, it would be beneficial to examine the context around these duplicate entries to determine if they indeed represent separate configurations or if they are part of a repeated block (e.g., due to a copy-paste error or similar).
Let's proceed by examining the lines around each occurrence of "wardenprotocol" to understand the context better.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Ensure that the chain_id 'wardenprotocol' does not conflict with other configurations
rg --type ts "chain_id: \"wardenprotocol\""
Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Examine the context around the occurrences of 'wardenprotocol' to determine if they represent separate configurations
rg --type ts -C 10 "chain_id: \"wardenprotocol\"" spaceward/src/config/chains.ts
Length of output: 985
| @@ -76,7 +75,7 @@ export function OwnersPage() { | |||
| </Button> | |||
| </div> | |||
| ))} | |||
| <div className="group w-full bg-card hover:bg-background overflow-scroll flex items-center justify-between px-4 py-4 border rounded-b-lg"> | |||
| <div className="group w-full bg-card overflow-scroll flex items-center justify-between px-4 py-4"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The review comment is correct. The AddSpaceOwnerForm component does not include any checks or validations for spaceId being null or undefined before using it in the sendMsgAddSpaceOwner function. This could lead to potential issues if spaceId is not validated elsewhere in the application. It is advisable to implement such checks within the component to handle edge cases effectively.
Analysis chain
Ensure that the AddSpaceOwnerForm component handles edge cases such as null or undefined spaceId.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of AddSpaceOwnerForm to ensure consistent handling of spaceId
rg --type tsx "AddSpaceOwnerForm"
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other usages of AddSpaceOwnerForm to ensure consistent handling of spaceId
rg "AddSpaceOwnerForm"
Length of output: 329
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Display the contents of AddSpaceOwnerForm.tsx to analyze how spaceId is handled
cat spaceward/src/features/owners/AddSpaceOwnerForm.tsx
Length of output: 1872
| <span className="block text-base"> | ||
| {"..." + address.slice(-8)} | ||
| {"..." + address.slice(-12)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
Address Display Consistency Check
The search results indicate that the address display logic varies across different components within the codebase:
PersonSelect.tsx: Displays the last 8 characters of the address.ConnectWallet.tsx: Displays the last 12 characters, the last 8 characters, and the first 12 characters combined with the last 12 characters in different instances.AddressUnit.tsx: Displays the first 4 and the last 4 characters of the address.
Given this variation, it appears that there is no consistent pattern for displaying addresses throughout the application. This inconsistency might affect user experience and could potentially impact privacy depending on the context in which these displays are used.
Recommendation: It is advisable to standardize the address display format across the application to ensure a consistent user experience and to adhere to privacy standards. This standardization should consider both usability and privacy implications.
Analysis chain
Ensure that the new address display logic showing more characters is consistent with privacy and usability standards.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances where addresses are displayed to ensure consistency
rg --type tsx "address.slice"
Length of output: 57
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Re-attempt to search for other instances where addresses are displayed using a corrected file type
rg --type ts "address.slice"
Length of output: 550
| @@ -79,7 +82,7 @@ | |||
| </PopoverTrigger> | |||
|
|
|||
| {address ? ( | |||
| <PopoverContent className="w-80 rounded-t-none border-t-0 -translate-y-1 bg-card"> | |||
| <PopoverContent className="w-80 bg-card border-0 p-6"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The verification of the PopoverContent styling in the ConnectWallet.tsx file against other implementations within the application reveals some variations. Here's a summary of the findings:
- In
SpaceSelector.tsx, thePopoverContentdoes not have any specific styling applied directly in the JSX. - In
Notifications.tsx, thePopoverContentis styled withclassName="w-96 bg-card", which differs in width from theConnectWallet.tsximplementation. - In
ConnectWallet.tsx, two different styles are applied:className="w-80 bg-card border-0 p-6"className="w-80 rounded-t-none border-t-0 -translate-y-1 bg-card"
These findings indicate that while the base class bg-card is consistently used, the width and specific border styling vary between different components. This suggests that the styling is not entirely consistent across the application, likely due to differing design requirements for each specific use case.
Conclusion
The new PopoverContent styling in ConnectWallet.tsx is not entirely consistent with other popover implementations in terms of width and border properties. However, the use of the bg-card class across different components suggests a partial consistency in background styling.
Analysis chain
Verify that the new PopoverContent styling is consistent with other popover implementations in the application.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other PopoverContent styling implementations for consistency
rg --type tsx "PopoverContent"
Length of output: 58
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Correcting the script to search for PopoverContent in .tsx files by specifying the file extension directly
rg "PopoverContent" -g '*.tsx'
Length of output: 1193
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
wardenprotocolbuenavistawith comprehensive asset lists.NoSpacesandSpaceSelector.Enhancements
Bug Fixes
Documentation