Add PanePane package to default channel

[mikesmithgh]

Please provide the following information:

• Link to your code repository: https://github.com/mjsmith1028/panepane
• Link to the tags page with at least one semver tag: https://github.com/mjsmith1028/panepane/tags

Also make sure you:

1. Used "tags": true and not "branch": "master" (versioning docs)
2. Ran the tests (tests docs)

[FichteFoll]

Report for panepane

Repository checks

No failures

No warnings

Package checks

Reporting 1 failures:

• The binding ['super+,'] unconditionally overrides a default binding
  File: Default (OSX).sublime-keymap

No warnings

For more details on the report messages (for example how to resolve them), go to:
https://github.com/packagecontrol/package_reviewer/wiki

---

Looks interesting. As I recently switched to i3wm, you might want to check out mode-switching where you enter resize-mode on a certain key-press and then have different key bindings active until you make the context not match anymore (e.g. after pressing Esc).

As a personal suggestion, you might want to check out https://github.com/SublimeText/InactivePanes.

[mikesmithgh]

@FichteFoll Thank you for the info. I didn't realize I should run package_reviewer. I just pulled that down and adjusted the osx keybindings. The tests passed on my latest tag, so it shouldn't override the defaults anymore. InactivePanes is a nice touch, I decided to update my demo and add that to my readme recommended pugins. It saves my eyes from hunting down that little cursor :). I haven't played around with i3wm so I may need to give that a shot. I have been using terminator for split screen in my terminal, it may be of interest to you https://gnometerminator.blogspot.com/p/introduction.html.

I like the idea of having a resize mode, so I may add that feature in the future. Thanks for the feedback!

Please let me know if anything else should be done to have this PR merged to master.

[FichteFoll]

I wrote package_reviewer only a few weeks ago to help with the package review process, so it isn't mentioned anywhere at the moment.