Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update rsa key #172

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

update rsa key #172

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@na-jakobs
Copy link
Author

@mpdude can you approve and merge this? 🙏

@na-jakobs
Copy link
Author

Closing based on comments #169

@na-jakobs na-jakobs closed this Mar 24, 2023
mpdude added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2023
We need to fix the SSH keys shipped with this action:
https://github.blog/2023-03-23-we-updated-our-rsa-ssh-host-key/

But, we have another issue
(#108) with regards to host
keys: On self-hosted runners which are not ephemeral the known_host file
fills up with repeated entries, because every action run adds a new line
with the same host keys.

Also, on those machines, the old key will still be in the `known_hosts`
file.

IMHO this action should not be repsonsible for shipping SSH host keys,
that's too much responsibility.

This section in the code is a leftover from early days when GitHub
provided runners did not include SSH keys at all. For a long time
already, GH takes care of placing their SSH keys in their runner images.

For self-hosted runners, those people setting up the runner should fetch
and verify SSH keys themselves and put it into the `known_hosts` file.

I know this is a breaking change and is going to annoy users. But on the
other hand, there is no better opportunity to drop this feature than
with an emergency-style key revocation as today.

Closes #106, closes #129, closes #169, closes #170, closes #172.
@na-jakobs na-jakobs deleted the patch-1 branch March 24, 2023 12:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant