-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Standards should be referenced by name #79
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
See
|
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | ||
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="./vendor/squizlabs/php_codesniffer/phpcs.xsd"> | ||
<rule ref="./vendor/webimpress/coding-standard/ruleset.xml"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you explain what's wrong with that method?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All phpcs ruleset I've seen/made have a name and can be used by its name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if this is still relevant, but I came across this PR when looking for something else.
@michalbundyra I've previously seen issues with sniff name based configuration not always working 100% correctly when a ruleset is imported via a file ref vs by name.
I suppose I should do a deep-dive into this at some point, but I agree with the recommendation that standards containing sniffs should be reference-able by name and that the recommendation should be to register them in installed_paths
and include them by name.
Also see my comments here:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, @jrfnl ! I'll have a look and try to sort it out.
<file>test</file> | ||
<file>config/</file> | ||
<file>src/</file> | ||
<file>test/</file> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess these are not really needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really. They show that for example src
is a directory, not a file.
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" | ||
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../vendor/squizlabs/php_codesniffer/phpcs.xsd"> | ||
<description>Webimpress Coding Standard</description> | ||
|
||
<!-- display progress --> | ||
<arg value="p"/> | ||
<arg name="colors"/> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why these are removed?
I wanted to have enabled progress and colours by default.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because command line options should be in the user's phpcs.xml, not in the coding standard.
Should I move args to the example in README?