The File System Standard PR #1
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
See whatwg/sg#176 for context.
See whatwg/sg#176 for context.
Closed
domenic
reviewed
Dec 3, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Repo structure stuff looks good. I skimmed index.bs changes but probably @mkruisselbrink is the right reviewer for that.
This was referenced Dec 8, 2021
foolip
approved these changes
Dec 13, 2021
This change: * Aligns the draft with the WHATWG boilerplate. * Removes local file system access and the sections related to that. * Aligns the introduction with that change in scope. * Changes instances of and/or to or. * Abstracts the permission model, largely to be used by dependent specifications. See whatwg/sg#176 for context.
mkruisselbrink
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This turns File System Access into the File System Standard as outlined in whatwg/sg#176.
Review from @mkruisselbrink and @domenic/@foolip appreciated.
Preview | Diff