Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove FTP support, maybe tighten up form submission scheme list? #5375

Open
domenic opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Remove FTP support, maybe tighten up form submission scheme list? #5375

domenic opened this issue Mar 19, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@domenic
Copy link
Member

domenic commented Mar 19, 2020

It seems Chrome and Firefox are removing FTP support.

On the spec side, most of the work is in Fetch (whatwg/fetch#1009). In HTML the only references I can find are in form submission step 22 and in the security considerations for the web+ scheme prefix.

Note that if we remove the form submission special case then the spec falls back to

If scheme is not one of those listed in this table, then the behavior is not defined by this specification. User agents should, in the absence of another specification defining this, act in a manner analogous to that defined in this specification for similar schemes.

This sentence makes me uneasy and I wonder if instead we can make the result fail somehow. (Maybe we just try to do a navigation, which fails once it hits the fetch layer.) This would require a bit of browser research.

@domenic domenic added removal/deprecation Removing or deprecating a feature topic: forms topic: fetch labels Mar 19, 2020
@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Mar 20, 2020

Navigation wouldn't hit the fetch layer as navigation would dispatch to the OS for unknown schemes (we should consider limiting such dispatching to top-level navigations though). Such dispatch only uses the URL though I think so supporting POST might be a bit meaningless. Not sure if it's worth cleaning up.

@annevk
Copy link
Member

annevk commented Feb 10, 2021

When I wrote the above I didn't realize that ftp scheme form submission uses "Get action URL" for POST too.

A question I have is what browsers end up passing to zoom.us for

<form action=zoommtg:test><input type=text value=x name=x><input type=submit></form>

as both Chrome and Firefox end up launching it if you consent. Do they pass test or more? If they just pass test it seems that "Get action URL" would be the default and we can remove ftp and javascript from that table and clarify things a bit.

annevk added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2021
Also, network scheme is now reduced to HTTP(S) scheme.

Helps with #5375, but form submission issue remains.

See whatwg/fetch#1166 for context.
annevk added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2021
Also, network scheme is now reduced to HTTP(S) scheme.

Helps with #5375, but form submission issue remains.

See whatwg/fetch#1166 for context.
imhele added a commit to imhele/html that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2021
* Editorial: remove redundant "the"

* Meta: default branch rename

Also correct a broken link. Not even w3.org URLs are that cool.

Helps with whatwg/meta#174.

* Editorial: clean up calls to "parse a URL"

It actually takes a string, so calls should be clear about that.

* Review Draft Publication: January 2021

* Simplify <link>s

In particular, remove their activation behavior, stop them from matching
:link and :visited, and stop suggesting that they be focusable areas.

This also includes a slight expansion and rearrangement of the link
element's section to make it clearer what hyperlinks created by <link>
are meant for, contrasting them to <a> and <area> hyperlinks.

Closes whatwg#4831. Closes whatwg#2617. Helps with whatwg#5490.

* Meta: remove demos/offline/* (whatwg#6307)

These are no longer needed as of e4330d5.

* Meta: minor references cleanup

Use more HTTPS and drop obsolete HTML Differences reference.

* Editorial: anticlockwise → counterclockwise

We use en-US these days. Spotted in https://twitter.com/iso2022jp/status/1352601086519955456.

* Use :focus-visible in the UA stylesheet

See w3c/csswg-drafts#4278.

* Editorial: align with WebIDL and Infra

* Fix "update a style block" early return

The new version matches implementation reality and CSSWG resolution.

The algorithm was also inconsistent, as it looked at whether
the element was in a shadow tree or in the document tree, but it was
only specified to be re-run if the element becomes connected or
disconnected.

The CSSWG discussed this in
w3c/csswg-drafts#3096 (comment)
and http://wpt.live/shadow-dom/ShadowRoot-interface.html tests this.

This also matches closer the definition of <link rel="stylesheet">,
which does use connectedness (though it uses "browsing-context
connected", which is a bit different):
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#link-type-stylesheet

* Modernize and refactor simple dialogs

This contains a small bug fix, in that confirm() and prompt() said
"return" in some cases instead of "return false" or "return null" as
appropriate.

Other notable changes, all editorial, are:

* Factoring out repeated "cannot show simple dialogs" steps, which will
  likely expand over time (see e.g. whatwg#6297).
* Separating out and explaining the no-argument overload of alert().
* Passing the document through to the "printing steps", instead of just
  having them talk about "this Window object".

* Meta: add definition markup for MessageEvent

* Remove <marquee> events

They are only supported by one engine (Gecko).

Closes whatwg#2957.

* Clarify when microtasks happen

* Ignore COEP on non-secure contexts

Fixes whatwg#6328.

* Editorial: update URL Standard integration

* Editorial: only invoke response's location URL once

Complements whatwg/fetch#1149.

* Track the incumbent settings and active script in Promise callbacks

Closes whatwg#5213.

* createImageBitmap(): stop clipping sourceRect to source's dimensions

It has been found in whatwg#6306 that this was an oversight at the time of its introduction. Current behavior goes against author expectations and no implementer has opposed the change to "no-clip".

Tests: web-platform-tests/wpt#27040.

Closes whatwg#6306.

* Remove CSP plugin-types blocking

With Flash not being supported anymore, the CSP directive plugin-types has lost its main reason for being and is being removed from the Content Security Policy specification: w3c/webappsec-csp#456.

This change removes references to the relevant algorithm from the Content Security Policy spec.

* Meta: set more dfn types

A follow-up to:

* whatwg#5694
* whatwg#5916

* Editorial: occuring → occurring

* Make all plugin-related APIs no-ops

Part of whatwg#6003.

* Disallow simple dialogs from different-origin domain iframes

Closes whatwg#5407.

* Revive @@iterator for PluginArray/MimeTypeArray/Plugin

@@iterator is implicitly installed by defining an indexed property getter. Since there is no other way to define it exclusively, this restores some methods back to being indexed getters.

This fixes an inadvertent observable behavior change in d4f07b8.

* Adjust web+ scheme security considerations to account for FTP removal

Also, network scheme is now reduced to HTTP(S) scheme.

Helps with whatwg#5375, but form submission issue remains.

See whatwg/fetch#1166 for context.

* Meta: export pause

Nobody but XMLHttpRequest take a dependency on this please. You have been warned.

Context: whatwg/xhr#311.

* Fix typo: ancestor → accessor

Fixes whatwg#6374.

Co-authored-by: Dominic Farolino <domfarolino@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Co-authored-by: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
Co-authored-by: Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emilio@crisal.io>
Co-authored-by: Momdo Nakamura <xmomdo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@chromium.org>
Co-authored-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Co-authored-by: Kaiido <tristan.fraipont@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Antonio Sartori <anton.sartori@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
Co-authored-by: Ikko Ashimine <eltociear@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Carlos IL <carlosjoan91@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kagami Sascha Rosylight <saschanaz@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Simon Pieters <zcorpan@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants