Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AccurateRipResponse test failures #515

Closed
felixonmars opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

AccurateRipResponse test failures #515

felixonmars opened this issue Nov 20, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Bug Generic bug: can be used together with more specific labels

Comments

@felixonmars
Copy link

======================================================================
FAIL: test_AccurateRipResponse_parses_correctly (whipper.test.test_common_accurip.TestAccurateRipResponse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/build/whipper/src/whipper-0.9.0/whipper/test/test_common_accurip.py", line 80, in test_AccurateRipResponse_parses_correctly
    self.assertEqual(responses[1].confidences[0], 6)
AssertionError: 7 != 6

======================================================================
FAIL: test_can_return_entry_without_saving (whipper.test.test_common_accurip.TestAccurateRipResponse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/build/whipper/src/whipper-0.9.0/whipper/test/test_common_accurip.py", line 53, in test_can_return_entry_without_saving
    self.assertEqual(get_db_entry(self.path), self.entry)
AssertionError: Lists differ: [<whi[55 chars]2f621d3370>, <whipper.common.accurip._Accurate[33 chars]370>] != [<whi[55 chars]2f621073d0>, <whipper.common.accurip._Accurate[33 chars]700>]

First differing element 1:
<whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f62eb3370>
<whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f62107700>

- [<whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f621d3370>,
?                                                                   ---

+ [<whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f621073d0>,
?                                                                  +++

-  <whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f62eb3370>]
?                                                                 ^^^^

+  <whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f62107700>]
?                                                                 ^^ ++


======================================================================
FAIL: test_retrieves_and_saves_accuraterip_entry (whipper.test.test_common_accurip.TestAccurateRipResponse)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/build/whipper/src/whipper-0.9.0/whipper/test/test_common_accurip.py", line 60, in test_retrieves_and_saves_accuraterip_entry
    self.assertEqual(get_db_entry(self.path), self.entry)
AssertionError: Lists differ: [<whi[57 chars]62107550>, <whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRi[31 chars]580>] != [<whi[57 chars]621073d0>, <whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRi[31 chars]700>]

First differing element 1:
<whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f621d3580>
<whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f62107700>

- [<whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f62107550>,
?                                                                    ^^

+ [<whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f621073d0>,
?                                                                    ^^

-  <whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f621d3580>]
?                                                                  ^^^^

+  <whipper.common.accurip._AccurateRipResponse object at 0x7f2f62107700>]
?                                                                  ^^^^


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 110 tests in 5.658s

FAILED (failures=3)
@github-actions
Copy link

👋 Thanks for opening your first issue here! If you're reporting a 🐞 bug, please make sure you include steps to reproduce it. We get a lot of issues on this repo, so please be patient and we will get back to you as soon as we can.

To help make it easier for us to investigate your issue, please follow the contributing instructions.

archlinux-github pushed a commit to archlinux/svntogit-community that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2020
git-svn-id: file:///srv/repos/svn-community/svn@757915 9fca08f4-af9d-4005-b8df-a31f2cc04f65
archlinux-github pushed a commit to archlinux/svntogit-community that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2020
git-svn-id: file:///srv/repos/svn-community/svn@757915 9fca08f4-af9d-4005-b8df-a31f2cc04f65
@JoeLametta
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, thanks for opening this issue.
For the tests we rely on live data which sometimes change generating failures like these.
These failures have been already fixed in develop with commit bbed92b.

Maybe I should tag a new release...

Related to #8, #291.

@JoeLametta JoeLametta added Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Bug Generic bug: can be used together with more specific labels labels Dec 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Accepted Accepted issue on our roadmap Bug Generic bug: can be used together with more specific labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants