Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add unit tests for the has_pending_actions_due method #1092

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

coreymckrill
Copy link
Contributor

In #1077 we're making some performance improvements to the has_pending_actions_due method, but there are no unit tests to protect against regressions, so this is simply adding some. Because the tests are in the abstract class, they will get run for each data store type.

@coreymckrill coreymckrill requested a review from a team August 24, 2024 00:40
@coreymckrill coreymckrill self-assigned this Aug 24, 2024
@coreymckrill coreymckrill requested review from naman03malhotra and removed request for a team August 24, 2024 00:40
Copy link

@naman03malhotra naman03malhotra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks, good to me, thanks for adding missing tests. Some CI tests are failing though.

In #1077 we're making some performance improvements to the
`has_pending_actions_due` method, but there are no unit tests to
protect against regressions, so this is simply adding some. Because
the tests are in the abstract class, they will get run for each
data store type.
@coreymckrill coreymckrill merged commit d686bbd into trunk Oct 31, 2024
34 checks passed
@coreymckrill coreymckrill deleted the add/has-pending-unit-tests branch October 31, 2024 00:10
@crstauf
Copy link
Contributor

crstauf commented Oct 31, 2024

More progress: keep it going! 🍻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants