Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tests] Skip the TypeDescriptorCanary test in .NET. #9527

Merged

Conversation

rolfbjarne
Copy link
Member

It tests internal implementation details, and those details have now changed
(dotnet/runtime#39973). So just skip the entire test
for now.

Fixes this test failure:

DontLink.CommonDontLinkTest
    [FAIL] TypeDescriptorCanary : System.InvalidCastException : Specified cast is not valid. :    at DontLink.CommonDontLinkTest.TypeDescriptorCanary() in /Users/builder/jenkins/workspace/xamarin-macios-pr-builder/tests/linker/CommonDontLinkTest.cs:line 22
        at System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture)

It tests internal implementation details, and those details have now changed
(dotnet/runtime#39973). So just skip the entire test
for now.

Fixes this test failure:

    DontLink.CommonDontLinkTest
        [FAIL] TypeDescriptorCanary : System.InvalidCastException : Specified cast is not valid. :    at DontLink.CommonDontLinkTest.TypeDescriptorCanary() in /Users/builder/jenkins/workspace/xamarin-macios-pr-builder/tests/linker/CommonDontLinkTest.cs:line 22
            at System.Reflection.RuntimeMethodInfo.Invoke(Object obj, BindingFlags invokeAttr, Binder binder, Object[] parameters, CultureInfo culture)
@monojenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

Build success
Provisioning succeeded
Build succeeded
API Diff (from stable)
API Diff (from PR only) (no change)
Generator Diff (no change)
Test run succeeded

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
not-notes-worthy Ignore for release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants