Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Scala DSL for prompt templating #143

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

necosta
Copy link
Contributor

@necosta necosta commented May 31, 2023

It feels to me Scala 3 extensions added by the user may work better than having them provided in this library. What am I missing?
cc: @juanpedromoreno , @serras , @nomisRev , @Yawolf

Copy link
Contributor

@juanpedromoreno juanpedromoreno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense to me, thanks @necosta .

However, I wonder how we would manage different inputs/placeholders. For example:

https://github.com/xebia-functional/langchain4s/blob/main/modules/examples/src/main/scala/com/xebia/functional/synopsisreviewsc/SynopsisReviewSC.scala

@necosta
Copy link
Contributor Author

necosta commented May 31, 2023

Makes sense to me, thanks @necosta .

However, I wonder how we would manage different inputs/placeholders. For example:

https://github.com/xebia-functional/langchain4s/blob/main/modules/examples/src/main/scala/com/xebia/functional/synopsisreviewsc/SynopsisReviewSC.scala

I'll check this later today @juanpedromoreno , let's keep the PR open for now.

@necosta
Copy link
Contributor Author

necosta commented Jun 1, 2023

After checking the above example, I think I can come back with a more useful template for users. Will close this PR and create a new one when ready.

@necosta necosta closed this Jun 1, 2023
@necosta necosta mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants