-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
HIF functionality (new) #572
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #572 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 92.88% 93.15% +0.27%
==========================================
Files 59 60 +1
Lines 4383 4498 +115
==========================================
+ Hits 4071 4190 +119
+ Misses 312 308 -4 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
188e1d3
to
85ab2c5
Compare
What's the difference between the HIF and our own format? |
Lots of things. The HIF standard is being developed with 3 other higher-order libraries (and hopefully more in the near future) which means that this will be much more standard. Secondly, HIF has far more features than the format used in XGI-DATA (empy edges, edge-dependent node attributes, directed hypergraphs, etc.) so my hope is that we can finalize the format and then convert the files in XGI-DATA to this sometime down the road. |
Great, sounds good, thanks a lot. |
This PR adds:
__add__
method forIDDict
This replaces PR Added HIF functionality #563