UX 基于背后的合理化，而非设计 #1903
Merged
UX 基于背后的合理化，而非设计 #1903
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@sqrthree 校对认领 |
|
@CACppuccino 好的呢 🍺 |
CACppuccino
reviewed
Jul 17, 2017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@horizon13th @sqrthree All good, aware swapping the Itally fronts to bold one.
| @@ -6,96 +6,95 @@ | |||
| > * 译者： | |||
| > * 校对者： | |||
|
|
||
| Research is super important, but *synthesizing* that information to come up with new opportunities is even more valuable than making products look good or building something which already exists. It also opens up the opportunity to give perspective to other designers working a team and allow them to leverage what they are working on to solve bigger issues aside from a specific solution. | ||
| 用户研究及其重要，然而，将用户研究所得到的信息与新机遇相*结合*更加重要。相比之下，把产品做好看，或者开发一个已经存在的产品便不那么重要了。用户研究让设计师们协作起来，给大家机会来表达自己的观点，用群众智慧组团解决更大的问题。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[将用户研究所得到的信息与新机遇相结合更加重要] =>[将用户研究所得到的信息结合而得到新机遇更加重要]
|
|
||
|  | ||
|
|
||
| connectivedx | ||
| I have been talking to a lot of people and writing down everything I learned so far, but *writing isn’t the same as understanding*. I was not using that information to generate understanding about the problem, but instead wrote it down in hopes of understanding it later. | ||
| 我和很多人聊过，写下每一件我学到的事情，但是*抄写不等于理解*，我并没能够通过写下这些内容而更好地理解问题，反而是想先记下以后再慢慢理解吧。 |
| - **Principles** define what the design should or shouldn’t do. These statements are grounded in research, and may be referred to as *implications* when you can tie them to research. | ||
| - **Concepts** establish an overall approach for the product, expressed as a central theme or idea. | ||
| - **Models** describe the product in an abstract way, showing the underlying architecture, structure, flow, or approach. They offer a sense of how the product will work (without actual functionality) | ||
| - **原则** 定义设计能做什么不能做什么，这些叙述是基于研究的，当它们与研究相联结时，可以被引用作为*奥义*。 |
|
|
||
| I had been learning a lot about my project, as well as talking to many people, but I wasn’t distilling any of that information into something actionable. Instead, I started to get stuck in a plethora of different information, letting myself get stuck in analysis paralysis because I wasn’t connecting that information to how it was going to help me move forward. | ||
| 在这个项目中，我学到了很多，与很多人聊天谈话，但起初我没能沉淀信息，付之行动。相反，我受阻于多方面冗余的信息，让自己困于麻痹的分析过程，因为我未能将得到的信息与实际生活相结合而进步。 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[因为我未能将得到的信息与实际生活相结合而进步。] => [因为我未能学会如何将得到的信息结合而进步。]
Closed
|
根据校对意见修改 |
linhe0x0
approved these changes
Jul 21, 2017
|
@horizon13th 已经 merge 啦~ 快快麻溜发布到掘金专栏然后给我发下链接，方便及时添加积分哟。 |
cdadar
pushed a commit
to cdadar/gold-miner
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2017
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #1831