Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump NJsonSchema from 10.5.2 to 10.8.0 #34

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: patch-3
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Sep 19, 2022

Bumps NJsonSchema from 10.5.2 to 10.8.0.

Release notes

Sourced from NJsonSchema's releases.

NJsonSchema v10.8.0

No release notes provided.

NJsonSchema v10.7.2

NJsonSchema v10.7.1

  • Introduced/enhanced validation settings (case insensitive property comparison & custom format validators in settings).

NJsonSchema v10.7.0

  • Various improvements (see merged PRs)

NJsonSchema v10.6.10

No release notes provided.

NJsonSchema v10.6.9

NJsonSchema v10.6.8

  • Fixed C# inheritance code generation for System.Text.Json
  • Other fixes

NJsonSchema v10.6.7

No release notes provided.

NJsonSchema v10.6.6

  • Fix bug in Namotion.Reflection

NJsonSchema v10.6.5

  • AdditionalProperties are only added on the base class (#1451)
  • Fix ConvertCSharpDocs multi-line regression (#1463)

NJsonSchema v10.6.4

  • Fixed toolchain version output in code generators

NJsonSchema v10.6.3

  • More performance improvements
  • Added UseXmlDocumentation and ResolveExternalXmlDocumentation settings in NJsonSchema
    • Breaking change: Use these settings instead of XmlDocsExtensions.ResolveFromNuGetCacheOrDotNetSdk

NJsonSchema v10.6.2

  • Some performance improvements

NJsonSchema v10.6.1

No release notes provided.

NJsonSchema v10.6.0

  • Breaking change: Migrate from DotLiquid to Fluid (reasons: much faster code generation & more strict liquid implementation)
    • You need to migrate custom templates: Replace elseif with elsif, fix newline handling (have a look at the updates templates in the repository).

... (truncated)

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [NJsonSchema](https://github.com/RicoSuter/NJsonSchema) from 10.5.2 to 10.8.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/RicoSuter/NJsonSchema/releases)
- [Commits](RicoSuter/NJsonSchema@v10.5.2...v10.8.0)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: NJsonSchema
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Sep 19, 2022

The following labels could not be found: CL-BuildPackaging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants