Implement non-exclusive backups with wal-e #686
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 2 commits
January 10, 2022 16:51
It makes it redundant to remove the backup_label file from the configure_spilo.py
for S3 compatible storages (e.g. minio). Run tests with wal-e in order to make sure that non-exclusive backup support works properly.
|
👍 |
1 similar comment
|
👍 |
christoph-heiss
pushed a commit
to cybertec-postgresql/spilo
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2022
It makes it redundant to remove the backup_label file from the configure_spilo.py
zer0def
pushed a commit
to zer0def/spilo
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2022
It makes it redundant to remove the backup_label file from the configure_spilo.py
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It makes it redundant to remove the backup_label file from the configure_spilo.py