Add notes about disputes #75
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
@Chralt98 Can you take a quick peek at this and tell me if this is still required or if there's any overlap? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I mean we still offer authorized markets on the polkadot js and ultimately in our protocol for main-net. However the decentralised court system should be fully controlling the dispute resolution by the time it is applied to the main-net. So, I think this deprecated functionality shouldn't be mentioned in the documentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should we mention here that the advisory committee can close markets early?
I am also currently wondering if we need this, if we have the more advanced feature of closing markets early (with fat finger protection).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I mean we still offer authorized markets on the polkadot js and ultimately in our protocol for main-net. However the decentralised court system should be fully controlling the dispute resolution by the time it is applied to the main-net. So, I think this deprecated functionality shouldn't be mentioned in the documentation.
Authorized is not deprecated though.
| @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ platform. It is allowed to make the following decisions: | |||
| - Reject advised markets if they are deemed valid (requires majority approval) | |||
| - Close markets (requires two-thirds approval) or destroy markets (requires full | |||
| approval) which are in gross violation of our rules of conduct | |||
| - Resolve disputes for markets with the [Authorized] dispute mechanism | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - Resolve disputes for markets with the [Authorized] dispute mechanism |
|
|
||
| <!-- Links --> | ||
|
|
||
| [authorized]: ./using-zeitgeist-markets.md#disputes |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| <!-- Links --> | |
| [authorized]: ./using-zeitgeist-markets.md#disputes |
| Every time a report is submitted (by the oracle or a stand-in), the market is | ||
| not resolved for another 24 hours. During this period of time, other users can | ||
| submit a _dispute_ if they believe that the report is incorrect. | ||
| When a report is submitted (by the oracle or a stand-in), the market is not |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is the stand-in the outsider? Can we avoid naming conflicts here?
| resolved for a certain window of time called the _dispute period_. During this | ||
| period of time, other users can submit a _dispute_ if they believe that the | ||
| report is incorrect. To do so, they stake a certain amount of ZTG, the _dispute | ||
| bond_ and report the outcome they believe to be correct (the _suggestion_). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| bond_ and report the outcome they believe to be correct (the _suggestion_). | |
| bond_. |
| How the dispute is resolved depends on what _dispute mechanism_ was selected | ||
| during market creation. The currently available dispute mechanisms are: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| How the dispute is resolved depends on what _dispute mechanism_ was selected | |
| during market creation. The currently available dispute mechanisms are: | |
| How the dispute is resolved depends on the [decentralized court] _dispute mechanism_. |
| - _Authorized_: After the market has been disputed, the [Advisory Committee] | ||
| decides which outcome the market will resolve to. | ||
| - _[Decentralized Court]_ (currently disabled): A group of randomly selected | ||
| jurors vote secretly to find a [Schelling point] among the market's outcomes, | ||
| which is then used as the resolved outcome. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - _Authorized_: After the market has been disputed, the [Advisory Committee] | |
| decides which outcome the market will resolve to. | |
| - _[Decentralized Court]_ (currently disabled): A group of randomly selected | |
| jurors vote secretly to find a [Schelling point] among the market's outcomes, | |
| which is then used as the resolved outcome. | |
| In short: A group of randomly selected jurors vote secretly to find a [Schelling point] among the market's outcomes, which is then used as the resolved outcome. |
|
I didn't check the non-modified lines of this file. I think if we just mention court as the dispute mechanism we are fine for the future, because why mentioning (soon) deprecated code? |
Co-authored-by: Chralt <chralt.developer@gmail.com>
Just getting the ball rolling on getting the docs up to speed.