Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

llvm: incremental Builder improvements #16487

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jacobly0
Copy link
Member

@jacobly0 jacobly0 commented Jul 22, 2023

  • add attributes
  • add non-intrinsic calls
  • add inline asm
  • add module asm
  • fix data layout for more targets

Closes #16482

@jacobly0 jacobly0 marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2023 05:04
@jacobly0 jacobly0 force-pushed the llvm-builder branch 2 times, most recently from 36b1582 to de4abe4 Compare July 23, 2023 10:17
Specifically this is to make sure llvm data layout generation doesn't
regress.  The no emit bin is to allow testing targets that can't
currently be linked.  The commented out targets are ones that fail in
the linker anyway when no emit bin is passed.
Also, implement TODOs from a previous commit.
@andrewrk andrewrk enabled auto-merge July 24, 2023 04:07
@andrewrk andrewrk merged commit d21d1d4 into ziglang:master Jul 24, 2023
10 checks passed
@jacobly0 jacobly0 deleted the llvm-builder branch July 28, 2023 02:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

incorrect data layout string generated on some targets with the new llvm logic
2 participants