Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unsafeRun in .toResource, preserve interruptibility of Reservation in Resource. add .toResourceZIO #10

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 29, 2019

Conversation

neko-kai
Copy link
Member

@neko-kai neko-kai commented Jun 28, 2019

Breaks API in a binary-incompatible way by changing required implicits, although I think it's worth it to avoid deadlocking user's program

@mijicd
Copy link
Member

mijicd commented Jun 28, 2019

@Kaishh you should have it now :)

@neko-kai
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks!

@neko-kai neko-kai requested review from mijicd, ghostdogpr, iravid, jdegoes and a team and removed request for a team June 28, 2019 15:55
@neko-kai neko-kai changed the title Remove unsafeRun in .toResource, preserve interruptibility of Reservaion in Resource. add .toResourceZIO Remove unsafeRun in .toResource, preserve interruptibility of Reservation in Resource. add .toResourceZIO Jun 28, 2019
iravid
iravid previously approved these changes Jun 28, 2019
Copy link
Member

@iravid iravid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

ghostdogpr
ghostdogpr previously approved these changes Jun 29, 2019
@neko-kai neko-kai dismissed stale reviews from ghostdogpr and iravid via d476e5e June 29, 2019 22:18
@neko-kai neko-kai merged commit c3c21f6 into zio:master Jun 29, 2019
@neko-kai neko-kai deleted the feature/toResource-unsafeRun-interruption branch June 29, 2019 22:18
@neko-kai neko-kai restored the feature/toResource-unsafeRun-interruption branch June 29, 2019 22:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants