-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 283
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Turbo boost enabled under low load #118
Comments
Thanks for confirming this. As I mentioned in #109 currently I've marked this bug as duplicate, and if possible let's continue this discussion in #109. |
@luispabon I made some changes in turbo-lover branch, you can get them by installing
Now it's using more conservative settings and turbo isn't triggered as easily as before. Let me know how it works for you. |
Copy that, I will do so as soon as I'm back to charging tomorrow 👍 |
@AdnanHodzic definitely much better than before. |
Do you want to keep this open until the change is released to non-beta? Or should I just close it? |
Good to hear, I could make turbo trigger even more conservative, but this seems like the right balance.
Don't worry about it, once I've released 1.3.2 final and promoted build to snap stable channel, I'll close it myself. I want to test it more myself and for @marc0der to confirm the same in #109 |
How about making it configurable which lets us use the default turbo boost load balance trigger or use a self defined threshold? |
@dnisyd while I was working on this I was thinking about the same thing. This would be ideal candidate for #26, but I'm not sure when I'll have time to start working on it. Also, until #26 is implemented, we need to have good "defaults" for triggering turbo. What was there before was too "trigger happy" in terms of turning on turbo. |
After thoroughly testing changes for few days, I've merged them with If you've been using beta channel you can switch to stable by running:
|
Looks like auto-cpufreq is a bit overzealous when deciding the system is under high load. You can see my debug below, 1% CPU usage and 0.62 system load. As a result, turbo is on probably when it shoudln't and the laptop is running a few degrees hotter than it could.
Under the same sort of load, without running auto-cpufreq the system temp is around 45/47 degrees C.
System information:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: