Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

4800 rename run-protocol package to inter-protocol #5595

Closed
wants to merge 22 commits into from

Conversation

turadg
Copy link
Member

@turadg turadg commented Jun 14, 2022

part of: #4800

Description

Single commit for review to include in the mega #5585

Security Considerations

no change

Documentation Considerations

Do we need a package redirect notice? I figure SDK is understood to be in flux, and the agoric command works as well.

Testing Considerations

--

@turadg turadg changed the base branch from master to 4800-unRUN June 14, 2022 22:53
@turadg turadg changed the title 4800 rename run files 4800 rename run-protocol package to inter-protocol Jun 14, 2022
@turadg turadg requested a review from Chris-Hibbert June 14, 2022 23:31
@turadg turadg marked this pull request as ready for review June 14, 2022 23:31
@turadg turadg requested a review from dtribble as a code owner June 14, 2022 23:31
Copy link
Contributor

@Chris-Hibbert Chris-Hibbert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

search for "RUN [pP]rotocol" in .../governance and .../inter-protocol, ignoring CHANGELOG files.

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ $(EVAL_CLEAN): $(EVAL_CODE)
./scripts/clean-core-eval.js $< >$@.t || { rm -f $@.t; exit 1; }
mv $@.t $@

RUN_PROTO=../run-protocol
RUN_PROTO=../inter-protocol
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why leave RUN_PROTO behind?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not intentional. this was a find-replace and I haven't looked over all the instances yet. I figured I would keep putting commits into #5585 but I'll get more into this one and mark it as Draft until I think it's ready to merge.

@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ gov-q:
$(AGCH) query gov proposals --output json | \
jq -c '.proposals[] | [.proposal_id,.voting_end_time,.status]'

deploy-runStake: ../run-protocol/test/runStake/runStake-deploy.js
echo agoric deploy ../run-protocol/test/runStake/runStake-deploy.js
deploy-runStake: ../inter-protocol/test/runStake/runStake-deploy.js
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is runStake renaming a separate pass?

Copy link
Member Author

@turadg turadg Jun 15, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep, needed to get alignment on the new name

@turadg turadg marked this pull request as draft June 15, 2022 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants