Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add idempotentId #1638

Open
wants to merge 31 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

feat: Add idempotentId #1638

wants to merge 31 commits into from

Conversation

Fargekritt
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Added IdempotentId based on self-defined id and org name

Related Issue(s)

#1573

Verification

  • Your code builds clean without any errors or warnings
  • Manual testing done (required)
  • Relevant automated test added (if you find this hard, leave it and we'll help out)

Documentation

  • Documentation is updated (either in docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)

@Fargekritt Fargekritt requested a review from a team as a code owner December 27, 2024 13:05
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces comprehensive support for idempotent dialog creation in the Dialogporten system. The changes span multiple components, including GraphQL schema, Swagger documentation, application logic, domain entities, and infrastructure configurations. The primary goal is to enable clients to create dialogs with a unique idempotent key, preventing duplicate dialog creation and providing better control over dialog management.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql Minor formatting change (newline removal)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json Added idempotentKey property to dialog creation and retrieval schemas
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs Added nullable IdempotentKey property
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/... Added IdempotentKey validation and support across multiple files
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/... Updated error handling and endpoint configurations for idempotent key conflicts
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/... Added database configuration and migration for IdempotentKey

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • MagnusSandgren
  • arealmaas

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Fargekritt Fargekritt changed the title Feat: Add idempotentId feat: Add idempotentId Dec 27, 2024
@Fargekritt Fargekritt marked this pull request as draft December 27, 2024 13:16
@Fargekritt Fargekritt marked this pull request as ready for review December 27, 2024 13:22
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/IdempotentId.cs (1)

5-7: Consider immutable properties for clarity.
Since these properties are crucial to the entity, you might benefit from using init; accessors or private set accessors to ensure the IdempotentId remains immutable once constructed.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/ReturnTypes/Conflict.cs (1)

7-9: Consider adding more context for debugging or user-facing errors.
Currently, only a generic "ConflictMessage" label and a Message are returned. You may consider including extra metadata (like an error code or relevant fields) for better traceability.

tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/all-tests.js (1)

5-16: Maintain consistent naming and grouping.
Adding createDialogWithThresholds, dialogCreateIdempotentId, and serviceOwnerSearchWithThresholds extends the test coverage. Verify that their naming and usage align with the patterns established in other modules.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/MappingProfile.cs (1)

17-17: Simplify null checks with the null-conditional operator.

Instead of using a ternary operator, consider using the null-conditional operator for brevity and readability:

- .ForMember(dest => dest.IdempotentId, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.IdempotentId != null ? src.IdempotentId.Idempotent : null))
+ .ForMember(dest => dest.IdempotentId, opt => opt.MapFrom(src => src.IdempotentId?.Idempotent))
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241216084435_AddIdempontentKey.cs (3)

8-8: Typo in migration name.

The class name AddIdempontentKey has a minor misspelling; consider correcting it to AddIdempotentKey to maintain naming consistency and clarity.


39-43: Index creation on dialog table.

The index on IdempotentIdIdempotent and IdempotentIdOrg helps with fast lookups. Should you expect high query volumes, validate that this index suits your performance needs.


44-50: Foreign key relationship.

You are referencing the IdempotentId table via a composite key. Check if you want a cascade behavior (e.g., ON DELETE CASCADE) to remove references automatically if needed. Otherwise, this one-to-one or many-to-one reference is correct.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/DialogDtoBase.cs (1)

17-21: Consider referencing the 36-character limit in the documentation.
While this new property is a welcome addition, it might be helpful to note in the doc comment (or through inline XML documentation) the maximum length constraint to align consumer expectations with the validation rules.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/GetDialogQuery.cs (1)

64-64: Evaluate whether eager loading is necessary.
Explicitly including IdempotentId in the query ensures the field is always retrieved. If this property is rarely used, consider lazy loading or a separate call to reduce unnecessary loading overhead.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommandValidator.cs (1)

47-50: Validation rule is correct and succinct.
Limiting this field to 36 characters ensures consistency with typical string-based IDs. If you need stricter format checks (e.g., special characters or whitespace), consider adding additional rules.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (1)

77-87: Optimize the idempotency check query

The current implementation uses Any() followed by First(), which results in two database queries. This can be optimized.

Consider this optimization:

-            var dialogQuery = _db.Dialogs.Select(x => x).Where(x => x.IdempotentId == dialogIdempotentId);
-            if (dialogQuery.Any())
-            {
-                return new Conflict($"IdempotencyId: '{request.IdempotentId}' already exists with DialogId '{dialogQuery.First().Id}'");
-                // return new Conflict(dialogQuery.First().Id.ToString());
-            }
+            var existingDialog = await _db.Dialogs
+                .Where(x => x.IdempotentId == dialogIdempotentId)
+                .Select(x => x.Id)
+                .FirstOrDefaultAsync(cancellationToken);
+            if (existingDialog != default)
+            {
+                return new Conflict($"IdempotencyId: '{request.IdempotentId}' already exists with DialogId '{existingDialog}'");
+            }

Also, remove the commented-out code as it's no longer needed.

docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (2)

2326-2330: Add validation rules and examples for the idempotentId field.

The idempotentId field definition would benefit from additional constraints and examples to guide API consumers.

Apply this diff to enhance the field definition:

   "idempotentId": {
     "description": "A self-defined Id may be provided to support idempotent creation of dialogs.\n            ",
     "nullable": true,
-    "type": "string"
+    "type": "string",
+    "maxLength": 100,
+    "pattern": "^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]+$",
+    "example": "order-123456"
   }

5587-5595: Improve documentation for the idempotentId query parameter.

The query parameter description should provide more context about its usage in search operations.

Apply this diff to enhance the parameter definition:

   {
     "description": "A self-defined Id may be provided to support idempotent creation of dialogs.\n            ",
+    "description": "Filter dialogs by their idempotentId. This can be used to find existing dialogs that were created with a specific idempotentId.",
     "in": "query",
     "name": "idempotentId",
     "schema": {
       "nullable": true,
-      "type": "string"
+      "type": "string",
+      "example": "order-123456"
     }
   }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2653f3f and 7650083.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241216084435_AddIdempontentKey.Designer.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/**/*Designer.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs
  • tests/k6/tests/performancetest_data/endusers-localdev.csv is excluded by !**/*.csv
  • tests/k6/tests/performancetest_data/serviceowners-localdev.csv is excluded by !**/*.csv
  • tests/k6/tests/performancetest_data/serviceowners-test.csv is excluded by !**/*.csv
📒 Files selected for processing (28)
  • docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (2 hunks)
  • docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (6 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/ReturnTypes/Conflict.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Externals/IDialogDbContext.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (3 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommandValidator.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogDto.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/MappingProfile.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Purge/PurgeDialogCommand.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/DialogDto.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/GetDialogQuery.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/MappingProfile.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/DialogDtoBase.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/MappingProfile.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQueryValidator.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/IdempotentId.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/DialogById/ObjectTypes.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/DialogDbContext.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241216084435_AddIdempontentKey.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Extensions/EndpointExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Extensions/ErrorResponseBuilderExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpoint.cs (2 hunks)
  • tests/k6/tests/enduser/all-tests.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/k6/tests/scripts/generate_tokens.sh (1 hunks)
  • tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/all-tests.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentId.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241216084435_AddIdempontentKey.cs (1)
Learnt from: elsand
PR: digdir/dialogporten#1110
File: src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20240910063003_AddDialogActivityDialogOpened.cs:13-16
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T05:32:45.312Z
Learning: Ensure that changes to domain entities are accompanied by corresponding migrations.
🔇 Additional comments (40)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/IdempotentId.cs (1)

3-3: Consider validating the constructor parameters.
If either org or idempotent can be null or empty, the code might encounter unexpected behavior. You could add argument checks or data annotations to avoid invalid states.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/ReturnTypes/Conflict.cs (1)

5-5: Good approach for standardizing conflict responses.
Using a record for conflict responses is a concise solution. This allows consistent handling of 409 Conflict cases throughout the code.

tests/k6/tests/enduser/all-tests.js (2)

5-5: Ensure the new import is valid and used consistently.
Double-check that './enduserSearchWithThresholds.js' is defined and used as intended for threshold-based tests.


12-12: Validate consistency with existing test patterns.
Invoking enduserSearchWithThresholds() aligns with the style of other test calls. Verify that the test results are properly integrated into any broader metrics or reporting.

tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/all-tests.js (1)

22-33: Verify overall test coverage with new calls.
Ensure these new calls (createDialogWithThresholds(), dialogCreateIdempotentId(), serviceOwnerSearchWithThresholds()) are adequately exercised and that you collect coverage data to assess test completeness.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpoint.cs (2)

41-42: Conflict handling added.

The new conflict handling scenario, mapped to this.ConflictAsync(conflict, ct), is correct. This ensures a well-defined response code and consistent error structure for idempotency conflicts.


30-31: Add 409 Conflict to documented response codes.

Great job adding StatusCodes.Status409Conflict to document the conflict scenario. Ensure comprehensive test coverage for both the success path and conflict path to confirm that this new response code is returned consistently.

✅ Verification successful

Let me search for test coverage of the 409 Conflict response.


Let me try a different search strategy to find test files.


Let me check the content of these test files to verify the conflict scenario coverage.


Let me check the context of the k6 test to understand the conflict scenario better.


Test coverage for 409 Conflict response is verified

The k6 test file tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentId.js contains comprehensive test coverage for the 409 Conflict scenario:

  • Tests the duplicate dialog creation scenario by attempting to create the same dialog twice
  • Verifies the correct 409 status code response
  • Validates the response body structure including:
    • Valid JSON response
    • Error details with Conflict property
    • Error message containing the conflicting dialog ID
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Searching for tests referencing 409 Conflict scenario in the codebase
rg -A 2 --json '409|ConflictAsync'

Length of output: 66706


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files related to CreateDialog endpoint
fd "CreateDialog.*Test" --exec rg -A 5 "409|Conflict"

Length of output: 55


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files containing CreateDialog in their name
fd "CreateDialog" "tests/" --type f

# Also search for any test files that might verify conflict scenarios
rg -l "409|Conflict.*test" "tests/"

Length of output: 424


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check CreateDialog test files and k6 test for conflict scenarios
rg -A 5 "409|Conflict" "tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/CreateDialogTests.cs" "tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Unit.Tests/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/CreateDialogTests.cs" "tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentId.js"

Length of output: 1537


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get more context around the conflict test in the k6 test file
rg -B 10 -A 2 "expectStatusFor\(r\).to.equal\(409\)" "tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentId.js"

Length of output: 553

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Extensions/EndpointExtensions.cs (1)

47-51: New extension for returning 409 Conflict.

Introducing the ConflictAsync method is a clean approach to returning 409 Conflict responses. This keeps response handling consistent with the existing HTTP extension methods and aligns with the newly introduced idempotency checks.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20241216084435_AddIdempontentKey.cs (4)

13-18: Adding columns for idempotent IDs.

This approach adds two columns with maximum length 255 for storing the idempotent ID. Verify that 255 is an appropriate column size, given that the feature might only require a shorter length (e.g., 36 characters).


20-25: Additional column for organization code.

The IdempotentIdOrg column mirrors the ID column. Ensure that the max length is consistent with any domain constraints or validations in your application code.


27-37: Creating a composite primary key.

Defining a composite primary key on (Idempotent, Org) aligns with the requirement for unique idempotent IDs across organizations. This enforces uniqueness at the database level and helps prevent duplication.


55-73: Down migration logic.

The down migration properly reverses all added objects. Ensure any related logic (such as removing data from dependent tables) is performed to maintain data integrity on rollback.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Purge/PurgeDialogCommand.cs (2)

46-46: Include the IdempotentId relationship carefully.
Good call including the IdempotentId when fetching a dialog. This ensures that subsequent logic for removing the IdempotentId from the database has all the necessary data.


60-63: Validate concurrency and usage around removal of the IdempotentId.
While removing the IdempotentId is essential for purging, ensure that no references to this identifier exist elsewhere. If there's any asynchronous usage of the same IdempotentId, removing it could cause conflicts.

Consider verifying that no other records reference the same IdempotentId and ensuring the removal aligns with the system's concurrency checks.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQueryValidator.cs (1)

22-25: Enforce stricter validation rules for IdempotentId if possible.
A maximum length of 36 characters is a good start, but consider whether additional format checks (e.g., ensuring it’s a valid GUID-like pattern) might be beneficial.

If the domain dictates that the IdempotentId should always follow a specific pattern, enforcing this here could prevent errors at runtime.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Externals/IDialogDbContext.cs (1)

48-49: Ensure naming consistency and usage for the new DbSet.
Adding DbSet<IdempotentId> IdempotentIds is clear, but confirm that it aligns with entity naming conventions. Also verify in your DialogDbContext implementation that you have correct mapping and relationships for the IdempotentIds table.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs (1)

45-45: Validate the nullable property usage.
Declaring IdempotentId? IdempotentId is flexible. If this property is considered required for certain operations, you may want to ensure it’s properly enforced at the application or database layer.

If always used in typical scenarios, consider a non-nullable approach with default creation. Otherwise, keep it nullable but ensure thorough validations.

tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentId.js (7)

1-2: Use consistent import methods or structure.
The imports look good. However, consider whether you also need check from K6 or any other helpers from k6 or your custom libraries, depending on the breadth of the tests.


5-8: Confirm test isolation.
These test blocks create and push dialogs into an array for cleanup later. This approach is valid. Ensure no concurrency or parallel test runs produce unexpected cross-test contamination when reusing dialogToInsert() or global arrays.


15-31: Good coverage for unused idempotentId.
This block tests a new idempotentId scenario thoroughly. Keep an eye on potential random collisions for idempotentId, though extremely unlikely, especially under parallel test conditions.


33-65: Clear test for multi-org usage.
Testing the same idempotentId across different orgs is essential. The code checks properly for success on both attempts. This ensures organizational separation is functioning.


67-92: Conflict scenario handled appropriately.
This test verifies the 409 conflict, which is the crucial idempotent check. Ensure that the conflict message provides enough context to developers or integrators when diagnosing.


94-106: Validation for max length of idempotentId.
The test ensures a 400 response for excessively long values. This is good practice and covers typical boundary conditions.


108-115: Cleanup ensures environment consistency.
Purging the created dialogs at the end of tests is best practice, maintaining a clean test environment. Overall, a complete test cycle.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Extensions/ErrorResponseBuilderExtensions.cs (1)

68-75: 409 conflict response structure aligns with best practices.
Using ValidationProblemDetails with status code 409 is a clear and standardized approach. Ensure that any additional data about the conflict (e.g., existing entity references) is passed in the errors dictionary if needed for improved traceability.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/DialogDbContext.cs (2)

51-51: DbSet for IdempotentId introduced.
Declaring IdempotentIds provides a strong foundation for managing idempotency records. Validate that all references to this new table are properly tested, especially regarding concurrency or unique constraints.


114-119: Composite key usage is correct.
Defining HasKey(x => new { x.Idempotent, x.Org }) prevents duplicates within the same org, aligning with the PR’s objective of ensuring unique constraints for idempotent IDs. This is an important clarity for domain logic.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/DialogById/ObjectTypes.cs (2)

1-1: New import for IdempotentId.
This reference ensures that the GraphQL layer can represent the newly introduced domain entity. Make sure your GraphQL schema interpretations and client usage for IdempotentId are consistently documented and validated.


38-38: Nullable IdempotentId property is aligned with optional usage.
Allowing null ensures backward compatibility where existing dialogs might not have an IdempotentId. Confirm that downstream code accounts for potentially null values to avoid runtime exceptions.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (2)

24-27: Property addition looks good.
This optional field and corresponding documentation help clarify how to filter dialogs by idempotent identifier.


176-176: Filter condition aligns properly with the new property.
The inline null check and subsequent equality check prevent null reference exceptions effectively.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogDto.cs (1)

22-25: Looks good from an idempotency perspective.

The addition of IdempotentId helps track and prevent duplicate creations. Please ensure that any calling logic or conflicting creation scenarios are properly handled to return a conflict/HTTP 409 if a dialog with the same IdempotentId already exists.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/DialogDto.cs (1)

22-25: Coordinate with the create flow for consistent usage.

Having a matching IdempotentId in both the create DTO and the query DTO is a sensible approach. Confirm that this property is included in any relevant lookup or searching logic, if you plan on retrieving the dialog by IdempotentId.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/MappingProfile.cs (1)

19-20: Verify the decision to ignore IdempotentId in mapping.

Ignoring IdempotentId here prevents persisting the string-based idempotency key to the DialogEntity. If the database or domain layer relies on IdempotentId, consider mapping it instead of ignoring, or confirm that the logic is handled elsewhere (e.g., distinct domain logic for conflict checks).

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/MappingProfile.cs (1)

21-22: Appropriate property mapping.

Mapping the domain’s IdempotentId object to a simple string property preserves the idempotency identifier in the returned data. Ensure null case handling is tested, especially if the original domain entity might not always hold a non-null IdempotentId.

tests/k6/tests/scripts/generate_tokens.sh (1)

36-37: LGTM! Verify environment mapping

The addition of the "localdev" environment mapping to "tt02" follows the existing pattern and is logically sound.

Run this script to verify all environment mappings are consistent:

✅ Verification successful

Environment mapping for "localdev" is consistent with staging

The verification confirms that the environment mapping for "localdev" to "tt02" is consistent with the codebase, as "tt02" is also used for the "staging" environment. This alignment makes sense as local development typically mirrors a test/staging environment. The complete environment mappings are:

  • test → at21
  • staging → tt02
  • yt01 → yt01
  • localdev → tt02
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any other environment mappings in the codebase
# to ensure consistency with the tt02 mapping for localdev

rg -A 1 "case.*API_ENVIRONMENT" 

Length of output: 154


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the entire switch statement content to see all environment mappings
rg -A 10 "case.*API_ENVIRONMENT" tests/k6/tests/scripts/generate_tokens.sh

Length of output: 314

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (1)

26-26: LGTM! Clean type extension

The addition of Conflict to the OneOfBase types is a clean way to handle idempotency conflicts.

docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (2)

109-109: LGTM! Nullable idempotentId field

The addition of the nullable idempotentId field to the Dialog type is correct and consistent with the implementation.


172-175: LGTM! Well-structured IdempotentId type

The IdempotentId type is well-defined with required fields that match the implementation.

Run this script to verify the type usage is consistent across the schema:

✅ Verification successful

GraphQL type IdempotentId matches its implementation and usage

The verification confirms that:

  • The GraphQL type IdempotentId in schema.verified.graphql correctly matches its C# entity implementation in src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/IdempotentId.cs
  • The type is properly referenced in the schema where a dialog can have an optional idempotentId field
  • The implementation includes proper database mapping and migrations
  • The type is consistently used across the codebase for idempotency checks during dialog creation
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of IdempotentId type
# and verify no other conflicting definitions exist

# Check for any other definitions or references to IdempotentId
rg "IdempotentId" 

# Check for any potential conflicts in type definitions
ast-grep --pattern 'type IdempotentId'

Length of output: 9971

docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (1)

2326-2330: Verify consistent implementation of idempotentId across the API.

Let's verify that the idempotentId field is consistently implemented across all relevant components.

Also applies to: 3414-3418, 4070-4074

✅ Verification successful

idempotentId implementation is consistent across the API specification

The verification shows that the idempotentId field is consistently implemented across the API specification with:

  • Consistent type definition as a nullable string
  • Consistent description indicating its purpose for idempotent dialog creation
  • Proper implementation in both query parameters and request bodies
  • Consistent usage across service owner and end user endpoints
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent implementation of idempotentId across the API specification
# Expected results: The field should be defined consistently in create/update commands and response DTOs

# Check all occurrences of idempotentId in the schema
echo "Checking idempotentId field definitions..."
rg -A 5 '"idempotentId":\s*{' docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json

# Check all endpoints that should handle idempotentId
echo "Checking endpoint definitions..."
rg -A 10 '"/api/v1/serviceowner/dialogs":\s*{' docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json

Length of output: 560


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent implementation of idempotentId across the API specification
# Let's fix the regex and try again

# Check all occurrences of idempotentId in the schema
echo "Checking idempotentId field definitions..."
rg -A 5 '"idempotentId"' docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json

# Check all endpoints that might handle idempotentId
echo -e "\nChecking endpoint definitions..."
rg -A 10 '"/api/v1/serviceowner/dialogs"' docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json

# Check for any other dialog-related endpoints
echo -e "\nChecking other dialog endpoints..."
rg -A 5 '"/api/v1/.*/dialog' docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json

Length of output: 9478

docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpointSummary.cs (1)

25-25: Provide further documentation or usage examples for consumers.

The addition of this 409 Conflict response is excellent to handle IdempotentId collisions. However, it might be helpful to include a short snippet or link in the Swagger documentation describing steps for clients to handle or avoid these conflicts, especially if they need to re-use the same IdempotentId or generate a new one.

tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentId.js (1)

105-112: Consider enhancing cleanup reliability.

While the cleanup works, consider making it more robust:

 describe('Cleanup', () => {
+    // Ensure cleanup runs even if tests fail
+    after(() => {
         let i;
         for (i = 0; i < dialogs.length; i++) {
             let r = purgeSO('dialogs/' + dialogs[i].id, null, dialogs[i].org);
             expectStatusFor(r).to.equal(204);
         }
         expect(dialogs.length).to.equal(i);
+    });
 });
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (1)

2326-2330: API documentation needs more detailed error descriptions.

The swagger changes properly document the idempotentId feature, but the 409 conflict error description could be more helpful:

   "409": {
-    "description": "Dialog with IdempotentId IdempotentId has already been created."
+    "description": "A dialog with the provided idempotentId already exists for this organization. The response will include the existing dialog's ID in the error details.",
+    "content": {
+      "application/problem+json": {
+        "schema": {
+          "$ref": "#/components/schemas/ProblemDetails"
+        }
+      }
+    }
   }

Also applies to: 3414-3418, 4070-4074, 5587-5595, 5899-5901

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7650083 and 0a7e7f7.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (6 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpointSummary.cs (1 hunks)
  • tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentId.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Constants.cs (1)

29-29: Consider adding clarifying information or support for localization.

The message is clear about the conflicting behavior. For larger or multi-lingual environments, consider adding a placeholder or indexing strategy to facilitate versioning or localization overrides as the project grows.

tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentId.js (4)

1-14: Test setup looks good!

The test file properly imports required utilities and sets up test data with dialog array and organization info.


15-30: First test case validates basic idempotentId functionality.

The test properly verifies:

  1. Creating a dialog with unused idempotentId returns 201
  2. Response contains valid UUID

32-63: Test validates organization-scoped idempotentId behavior.

Good test coverage showing that:

  1. Same idempotentId can be used across different organizations
  2. Both creations succeed with 201 status

65-89: Test properly validates conflict handling.

Good coverage of the conflict scenario:

  1. First creation with idempotentId succeeds (201)
  2. Second creation with same idempotentId fails (409)
  3. Error response contains conflict details with original dialog ID

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Jan 9, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (1)

5899-5901: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance the 409 Conflict response definition.

The 409 Conflict response should include a description and schema to help API consumers handle duplicate idempotentId cases properly.

Apply this diff to enhance the response definition:

   "409": {
-    "description": "Dialog with IdempotentId 01941821-ffca-73a1-9335-435a882be014 has already been created."
+    "description": "A dialog with the provided idempotentId already exists.",
+    "content": {
+      "application/problem+json": {
+        "schema": {
+          "$ref": "#/components/schemas/ProblemDetails"
+        }
+      }
+    }
   }
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (2)

2326-2330: Enhance the idempotentId property documentation.

The property description should provide more details about:

  • Format/constraints for the identifier
  • Best practices for generating the identifier
  • Scope of uniqueness (per organization, global, etc.)
  • Persistence duration of the identifier

Apply this diff to improve the documentation:

           "idempotentId": {
-            "description": "A self-defined Id may be provided to support idempotent creation of dialogs.\n            ",
+            "description": "A self-defined identifier to ensure idempotent dialog creation. Must be unique within the organization's scope. The identifier should be a string that is unique to the business context (e.g. case number, reference ID). The identifier persists for the lifetime of the dialog.\n\nExample: \"case-123456\" or \"org:reference:2024:001\"",
             "nullable": true,
             "type": "string"
           },

Also applies to: 3414-3418, 4070-4074


5587-5595: Enhance the idempotentId search parameter documentation.

The search parameter description should provide more context about its usage in search operations.

Apply this diff to improve the documentation:

           {
-            "description": "A self-defined Id may be provided to support idempotent creation of dialogs.\n            ",
+            "description": "Filter dialogs by their idempotent identifier. This can be used to find existing dialogs created with a specific business identifier, helping to prevent duplicates and enable retry scenarios.",
             "in": "query",
             "name": "idempotentId",
             "schema": {
               "nullable": true,
               "type": "string"
             }
           },
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 84169fc and 5ccd0d5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (5 hunks)

Copy link
Collaborator

@MagnusSandgren MagnusSandgren left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Tror dette kan løses bedre med en unique index for org og IdempotentId på dialog tabellen i stede for en egen tabell for dette.
  • IQueryables er dyrt og må håndteres med async og unngå multiple enumerations.

Vi kan ta en prat om dette @Fargekritt 🙂

Changed IdempotentKey from Entity to Composite index.
@Fargekritt Fargekritt requested a review from a team as a code owner January 13, 2025 13:11
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250113122026_AddIdempontentKey.cs (1)

8-9: Fix typo in migration class name

The class name contains a typo: "Idempontent" should be "Idempotent".

-    public partial class AddIdempontentKey : Migration
+    public partial class AddIdempotentKey : Migration
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Dialogs/DialogEntityConfiguration.cs (1)

25-25: Consider monitoring index performance.

While the unique index is necessary for idempotency, it may impact write performance as it needs to be maintained for every insert/update. Consider monitoring its impact on database performance, especially under high load.

tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentKey.js (2)

32-63: Consider adding more edge cases for organization testing.

While the test covers different organizations using the same idempotent key, consider adding tests for:

  • Empty organization name
  • Organization name with special characters
  • Very long organization names

91-103: Consider adding more validation test cases.

While the test covers the too-long scenario, consider adding tests for:

  • Empty string
  • Whitespace-only string
  • Special characters
  • Unicode characters
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Externals/IDialogDbContext.cs (2)

Line range hint 48-65: Add examples to XML documentation.

The XML documentation for MustWhenModified is good but would benefit from code examples showing usage patterns.


Line range hint 66-70: Add XML documentation for GetExistingIds.

The GetExistingIds method is missing XML documentation explaining its purpose and return value.

Add documentation like:

+    /// <summary>
+    /// Retrieves the list of existing identifiers for the provided entities.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <typeparam name="TEntity">The type of the entity.</typeparam>
+    /// <param name="entities">The collection of entities to check.</param>
+    /// <param name="cancellationToken">The cancellation token.</param>
+    /// <returns>A list of existing entity identifiers found in the database.</returns>
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (1)

92-92: Improve error message formatting.

Consider using a more structured error message format that's consistent with other error messages in the codebase.

-                return new Conflict($"IdempotencyId: '{request.IdempotentKey}' already exists with DialogId '{dialogQuery.Id}'");
+                return new Conflict($"Dialog with IdempotencyId '{request.IdempotentKey}' already exists (DialogId: '{dialogQuery.Id}')");
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ccd0d5 and bd3e2f9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250113122026_AddIdempontentKey.Designer.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/**/*Designer.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (1 hunks)
  • docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (5 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Externals/IDialogDbContext.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (3 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommandValidator.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogDto.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Purge/PurgeDialogCommand.cs (0 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/DialogDto.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/DialogById/ObjectTypes.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Dialogs/DialogEntityConfiguration.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/DialogDbContext.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250113122026_AddIdempontentKey.cs (1 hunks)
  • tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Unit.Tests/ObjectTypes/DialogEntityTests.cs (1 hunks)
  • tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/all-tests.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentKey.js (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Purge/PurgeDialogCommand.cs
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Get/DialogDto.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommandValidator.cs
  • tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/all-tests.js
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Domain/Dialogs/Entities/DialogEntity.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogDto.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/DialogById/ObjectTypes.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/DialogDbContext.cs
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250113122026_AddIdempontentKey.cs (3)

13-18: Consider making IdempotentKey non-nullable

The IdempotentKey column is defined as nullable, but it's part of a unique index. This could lead to unexpected behavior when handling null values in the unique constraint. Consider making it non-nullable if it's meant to be a required field for idempotency.

Also, there's a discrepancy between the database column length (255) and the application layer validation (36 characters). Consider aligning these constraints to prevent potential issues.


28-37: LGTM: Down migration is complete

The Down migration correctly removes both the index and the column in the proper order.


20-25: Verify index naming convention

The index name IX_Dialog_Org_IdempotentKey follows EF Core conventions, which is good. However, since this is a business-critical unique constraint for idempotency, consider using a more descriptive name that reflects its purpose.

Run this script to check existing index naming patterns:

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Dialogs/DialogEntityConfiguration.cs (1)

25-25: LGTM! Well-implemented database constraint for idempotency.

The unique composite index on Org and IdempotentKey is correctly implemented and essential for preventing duplicate dialogs. The existing "C" collation on the Org column ensures case-sensitive comparisons.

Please ensure proper error handling is in place for unique constraint violations. Run this script to verify the error handling implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Proper error handling confirmed for idempotency conflicts

The codebase correctly handles duplicate dialog creation attempts:

  • Returns HTTP 409 Conflict for idempotency violations
  • Includes proper error details and documentation
  • Follows REST principles for conflict resolution
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for duplicate key error handling in the codebase
rg -A 5 "DbUpdateException|Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlException"

# Look for idempotency-related error handling patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'catch ($exception) {
  $$$
  DbUpdateException
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 145


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for dialog creation endpoints and services
rg -l "CreateDialog|CreateAsync.*Dialog"

# Search for conflict response handling
rg -A 5 "IResult.*Conflict|StatusCode.*409"

# Search for exception handling in dialog-related files
fd "Dialog.*\.cs" --exec rg -A 5 "catch|throw"

Length of output: 18972

tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQl.Unit.Tests/ObjectTypes/DialogEntityTests.cs (1)

21-22: LGTM!

The addition of IdempotentKey to the ignoreList is consistent with the test's purpose of comparing GraphQL and entity properties.

tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/dialogCreateIdempotentKey.js (3)

15-30: LGTM! Test coverage for unique idempotent key creation.

The test correctly verifies the successful creation of a dialog with a unique idempotent key.


65-89: LGTM! Comprehensive conflict testing.

The test properly verifies the 409 Conflict response and error details when attempting to reuse an idempotent key.


105-112: LGTM! Proper cleanup implementation.

The cleanup ensures test isolation by removing all created dialogs.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (1)

26-26: LGTM! Using 409 Conflict is appropriate.

Based on past review discussions, using 409 Conflict for idempotent key collisions is the correct choice as it allows clients to handle the response without parsing the body.

docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (1)

5899-5901: Add description and schema for the 409 Conflict response.

The 409 Conflict response should include a description and schema to help API consumers handle duplicate idempotentId cases properly.

Apply this diff to enhance the response definition:

   "409": {
-    "description": "Dialog with IdempotentId 01941821-ffca-73a1-9335-435a882be014 has already been created."
+    "description": "A dialog with the provided idempotentId already exists.",
+    "content": {
+      "application/problem+json": {
+        "schema": {
+          "$ref": "#/components/schemas/ProblemDetails"
+        }
+      }
+    }
   }

 * Conflict.cs now takes in ConflictError in ctor, with propertyNAme and ErrorMessage
 * Changed IdempotendId => IdempotentKey
 * IdempotenKey now has max length of 36
 * Added Org, IdempotentKey index filter
 * Updated comments
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/ReturnTypes/Conflict.cs (4)

5-7: Add parameter validation and XML documentation.

Consider adding null checks and XML documentation to improve API clarity and robustness.

+/// <summary>
+/// Represents a conflict response containing one or more conflict errors.
+/// </summary>
+/// <param name="Conflicts">The collection of conflict errors.</param>
 public sealed record Conflict(IEnumerable<ConflictError> Conflicts)
 {
+    public Conflict(ConflictError error) : this([error])
+    {
+        ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(error);
+    }
-    public Conflict(ConflictError error) : this([error]) { }

8-10: Add XML documentation for the ToValidationResults method.

The method's purpose should be documented for better API clarity.

+    /// <summary>
+    /// Converts the conflict errors to a list of validation failures.
+    /// </summary>
+    /// <returns>A list of validation failures representing the conflicts.</returns>
     public List<ValidationFailure> ToValidationResults() => Conflicts
         .Select(x => new ValidationFailure(x.PropertyName, x.ErrorMessage))
         .ToList();

13-13: Enhance ConflictError with validation and documentation.

Add parameter validation and XML documentation. Consider adding string length constraints if applicable to your use case.

+/// <summary>
+/// Represents a specific conflict error with a property name and error message.
+/// </summary>
+/// <param name="PropertyName">The name of the property that caused the conflict.</param>
+/// <param name="ErrorMessage">The error message describing the conflict.</param>
-public sealed record ConflictError(string PropertyName, string ErrorMessage);
+public sealed record ConflictError(string PropertyName, string ErrorMessage)
+{
+    public ConflictError(string propertyName, string errorMessage) : this()
+    {
+        ArgumentException.ThrowIfNullOrWhiteSpace(propertyName);
+        ArgumentException.ThrowIfNullOrWhiteSpace(errorMessage);
+        
+        PropertyName = propertyName;
+        ErrorMessage = errorMessage;
+    }
+}

1-13: Overall implementation looks good!

The code provides a clean and well-structured solution for handling conflict scenarios, particularly useful for the idempotent dialog creation feature. The use of records and modern C# features is appropriate, and the design is extensible.

Consider adding integration tests to verify the conflict handling behavior in the context of idempotent dialog creation, especially around edge cases with the IdempotentKey.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bd3e2f9 and f9fe516.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250114083514_AddIdempontentKey.Designer.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/**/*Designer.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
  • docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (5 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Common/ReturnTypes/Conflict.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (3 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommandValidator.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogDto.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/DialogDtoBase.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQueryValidator.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/DialogById/ObjectTypes.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Dialogs/DialogEntityConfiguration.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250114083514_AddIdempontentKey.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpointSummary.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/DialogDtoBase.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.GraphQL/EndUser/DialogById/ObjectTypes.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Constants.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQueryValidator.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommandValidator.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogDto.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpointSummary.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Dialogs/DialogEntityConfiguration.cs
🔇 Additional comments (6)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (3)

3414-3418: Fix inconsistent property naming and description in response schemas.

The same naming inconsistency and minimal description exists in the response schemas.

Apply the same property renaming and description enhancement to both schemas.

Also applies to: 4070-4074


2326-2330: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance property description and align naming.

The property needs a more detailed description to help API consumers understand its purpose and behavior. Also, the naming should be consistent with the PR title/objectives which use idempotentId.

Apply this diff to improve the property:

-          "idempotentKey": {
+          "idempotentId": {
             "description": "A self-defined Id may be provided to support idempotent creation of dialogs.",
+            "description": "A client-defined identifier used to ensure idempotent dialog creation. If a dialog with the same idempotentId already exists for the authenticated service owner, a 409 Conflict response will be returned instead of creating a duplicate dialog. Must be unique within the scope of the authenticated service owner.",
             "nullable": true,
             "type": "string"
           },

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


5899-5901: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance 409 Conflict response definition.

The 409 response should include a proper schema and detailed description to help API consumers handle duplicate idempotentId cases properly.

Apply this diff to improve the response:

           "409": {
-            "description": "Dialog with IdempotentKey 01941821-ffca-73a1-9335-435a882be014 has already been created."
+            "description": "A dialog with the provided idempotentId already exists for the authenticated service owner.",
+            "content": {
+              "application/problem+json": {
+                "schema": {
+                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/ProblemDetails"
+                }
+              }
+            }
           },

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250114083514_AddIdempontentKey.cs (3)

28-37: LGTM! Down migration is properly implemented.

The Down migration correctly reverses the changes in the proper order:

  1. Drops the index first
  2. Then drops the column

1-39: Consider documenting the idempotency key format and lifecycle.

This migration introduces organization-scoped idempotent dialog creation. To ensure proper usage:

  1. Document the expected format and constraints of the idempotency key
  2. Define the key's lifecycle (e.g., expiration, reuse policy)
  3. Provide guidance on handling conflicts and retries

13-24: Verify behavior of unique index with nullable column.

The unique composite index on (Org, IdempotentKey) includes a nullable column. Please verify:

  1. Multiple dialogs with NULL IdempotentKey values are allowed for the same Org
  2. Only non-NULL IdempotentKey values are constrained to be unique per Org
✅ Verification successful

Unique index implementation is correct

The unique index implementation correctly handles NULL values in PostgreSQL through the use of a filtered index (HasFilter(null)). This ensures:

  • Multiple dialogs with NULL IdempotentKey values are allowed for the same Org
  • Only non-NULL IdempotentKey values are constrained to be unique per Org
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the database provider (PostgreSQL) handles NULL values in unique indexes as expected

# Search for test cases that verify this behavior
rg -l "IdempotentKey.*null.*unique" --type cs

# Check if there are any existing unique indexes on nullable columns for reference
ast-grep --pattern 'CreateIndex($$$unique: true$$$)' | rg -A 5 'nullable: true'

Length of output: 129


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Dialog-related test files
fd "Dialog.*Tests?.cs$"

# Search for idempotency-related code
rg -l "Idempotent" --type cs

# Look for similar migration patterns with composite indexes
rg -l "CreateIndex.*columns: new\[\]" --type cs

# Check Dialog entity definition
ast-grep --pattern 'class Dialog {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 3807


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check CreateDialog tests for idempotency scenarios
rg -A 10 "CreateDialog.*IdempotentKey" tests/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application.Integration.Tests/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/CreateDialogTests.cs

# Check entity configuration
cat src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Dialogs/DialogEntityConfiguration.cs

# Check create dialog endpoint
cat src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpointSummary.cs

Length of output: 3403

…field

# Conflicts:
#	src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9fe516 and 4eee9ec.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (5 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (3 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpoint.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpointSummary.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpointSummary.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Common/Constants.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.WebApi/Endpoints/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Create/CreateDialogEndpoint.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy service to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy graphql to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy web-api-so to test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (2)

5920-5922: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance the 409 Conflict response definition.

The 409 Conflict response needs a more detailed definition:

           "409": {
-            "description": "Dialog with IdempotentKey 01941821-ffca-73a1-9335-435a882be014 has already been created."
+            "description": "A dialog with the provided idempotentId already exists for the authenticated service owner.",
+            "content": {
+              "application/problem+json": {
+                "schema": {
+                  "$ref": "#/components/schemas/ProblemDetails"
+                },
+                "example": {
+                  "type": "https://dialogporten.no/problems/dialog-already-exists",
+                  "title": "Dialog Already Exists",
+                  "status": 409,
+                  "detail": "A dialog with idempotentId '01941821-ffca-73a1-9335-435a882be014' already exists.",
+                  "instance": "/api/v1/serviceowner/dialogs"
+                }
+              }
+            }
           },

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


5599-5607: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve query parameter definition.

The query parameter definition needs enhancements:

           {
-            "description": "Filter by IdempotentKey ",
+            "description": "Filter dialogs by their idempotentId. Returns dialogs that exactly match the provided identifier. The identifier must be unique within the scope of the authenticated service owner.",
-            "name": "idempotentKey",
+            "name": "idempotentId",
             "in": "query",
             "schema": {
               "nullable": true,
+              "example": "01941821-ffca-73a1-9335-435a882be014",
               "type": "string"
             }
           },

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4eee9ec and a92f270.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (5 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (3 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommandValidator.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogDto.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommandValidator.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogDto.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (2)

5619-5627: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve query parameter description and naming.

The query parameter needs a more descriptive explanation of its filtering behavior and should use consistent naming.

Apply this diff to improve the parameter:

           {
-            "description": "Filter by IdempotentKey ",
+            "description": "Filter dialogs by their idempotentId. Returns dialogs that exactly match the provided identifier.",
-            "name": "idempotentKey",
+            "name": "idempotentId",
             "in": "query",
             "schema": {
               "nullable": true,
               "type": "string"
             }
           },

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


5940-5942: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add description and schema for the 409 Conflict response.

The 409 Conflict response should include a description and schema to help API consumers handle duplicate idempotentId cases properly.

Apply this diff to enhance the response definition:

   "409": {
-    "description": "Dialog with IdempotentKey 01941821-ffca-73a1-9335-435a882be014 has already been created."
+    "description": "A dialog with the provided idempotentId already exists.",
+    "content": {
+      "application/problem+json": {
+        "schema": {
+          "$ref": "#/components/schemas/ProblemDetails"
+        }
+      }
+    }
   }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250114122240_AddIdempotentKey.cs (1)

13-18: Consider making IdempotentKey non-nullable.

The column is currently nullable, which might affect the uniqueness constraint and complicate idempotency guarantees. If the IdempotentKey is meant to be a required identifier for idempotency, consider making it non-nullable.

 migrationBuilder.AddColumn<string>(
     name: "IdempotentKey",
     table: "Dialog",
     type: "character varying(36)",
     maxLength: 36,
-    nullable: true);
+    nullable: false);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3524d7e and 2b61954.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250114122240_AddIdempotentKey.Designer.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/**/*Designer.cs
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250114122240_AddIdempotentKey.cs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250114122240_AddIdempotentKey.cs (2)

5-38: LGTM! Well-structured migration with proper rollback support.

The migration is well-implemented with:

  • Clear naming that reflects the purpose
  • Proper column type and length constraints
  • Composite index that aligns with the organization-scoped idempotency requirement
  • Correct rollback order in the Down method

20-24: Verify handling of null values in the unique index.

Since IdempotentKey is nullable and part of a unique composite index, verify how your database handles multiple null values. Some databases treat nulls as distinct values in unique indexes, while others don't.

✅ Verification successful

Implementation correctly handles null values in the unique index

The composite unique index on (Org, IdempotentKey) is properly implemented in PostgreSQL, which treats NULL values as distinct. The entity configuration and database schema consistently handle nullable IdempotentKey values, and the application layer includes proper validation and conflict detection.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any existing dialogs with null IdempotentKey
# and verify database behavior with null handling in unique indexes

# Search for database configuration to determine the provider
rg -A 5 "UseNpgsql|UseSqlServer" src/

# Search for any existing null handling or similar indexes
rg -A 5 "CreateIndex.*unique: true.*nullable" src/

Length of output: 1261


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Dialog entity definition and IdempotentKey property
ast-grep --pattern 'class Dialog {
  $$$
}'

# Search for Dialog entity configuration
rg -l "Dialog.*Configure|IEntityTypeConfiguration.*Dialog" src/

# Get the complete migration file content
cat src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250114122240_AddIdempotentKey.cs

Length of output: 2333


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the Dialog entity configuration content
cat src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Dialogs/DialogEntityConfiguration.cs

# Search for any fluent API configurations related to IdempotentKey
rg -A 3 "IdempotentKey" src/

Length of output: 16162

# Conflicts:
#	tests/k6/tests/performancetest_data/endusers-localdev.csv
#	tests/k6/tests/scripts/generate_tokens.sh
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (1)

176-177: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Optimize query by including Org in the IdempotentKey filter.

Since IdempotentKey is unique per organization (as indicated by the database's unique index), the query should filter by both fields to utilize the index effectively.

             .Include(x => x.Org)
-            .WhereIf(request.IdempotentKey is not null, x => x.IdempotentKey == request.IdempotentKey)
+            .WhereIf(request.IdempotentKey is not null, x => x.IdempotentKey == request.IdempotentKey && x.Org != null)
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (1)

24-27: Enhance the XML documentation for IdempotentKey.

The current documentation is minimal. Consider adding more details about:

  • The purpose and benefits of using IdempotentKey
  • The format requirements or constraints
  • The relationship with organization (Org)
     /// <summary>
-    /// Filter by IdempotentKey 
+    /// Filter dialogs by their IdempotentKey. The IdempotentKey is a client-defined identifier that,
+    /// when combined with the organization, ensures uniqueness of dialog creation operations.
+    /// This can be used to safely retry operations without creating duplicate dialogs.
     /// </summary>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 346a694 and 3e66899.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (2 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQueryValidator.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQueryValidator.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy service to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy graphql to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy web-api-so to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy web-api-eu to test
  • GitHub Check: build / build-and-test

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250117113218_AddIdempotentKey.cs (2)

13-19: Consider using UUID type instead of varchar.

The column length of 36 characters suggests this might store UUIDs. If that's the case, consider using the native uuid type instead of character varying(36) for better type safety and potential performance benefits.


1-40: Consider distributed systems implications of idempotency.

The implementation looks solid, but consider these architectural aspects:

  1. Ensure proper error handling for race conditions during dialog creation
  2. Consider adding a TTL (time-to-live) for idempotent keys to prevent indefinite storage
  3. Document the idempotency behavior in the API documentation, including:
    • Key format requirements
    • Expiration policy (if implemented)
    • Conflict resolution strategy
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e66899 and 9f846c7.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250117113218_AddIdempotentKey.Designer.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/**/*Designer.cs
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs is excluded by !**/Migrations/DialogDbContextModelSnapshot.cs
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Dialogs/DialogEntityConfiguration.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250117113218_AddIdempotentKey.cs (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Configurations/Dialogs/DialogEntityConfiguration.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy service to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy graphql to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy web-api-so to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy web-api-eu to test
  • GitHub Check: build / build-and-test
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250117113218_AddIdempotentKey.cs (3)

1-9: LGTM! Migration class follows standard conventions.

The migration class is properly structured and follows Entity Framework Core conventions.


29-38: LGTM! Down migration properly reverses the changes.

The Down migration correctly drops the index before removing the column, maintaining proper order of operations.


20-26: Verify PostgreSQL quoted identifier compatibility.

The index filter condition uses double quotes around the column name: "IdempotentKey". While this works, it's worth verifying if your PostgreSQL configuration consistently handles quoted identifiers across all environments.

Run this script to check existing indexes and their definitions:

✅ Verification successful

Quoted identifier usage is consistent and follows best practices

The quoted identifier in the index filter is correctly implemented:

  • Generated from type-safe entity configuration using nameof operator
  • Follows standard EF Core pattern for nullable unique indexes in PostgreSQL
  • Consistently used across the codebase
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check existing indexes in the codebase for quoted identifier usage patterns

# Search for CreateIndex calls in migrations
rg -l 'CreateIndex.*filter:.*\".*\"' --type cs

# Search for index definitions in entity configurations
rg -l 'HasIndex.*IsUnique.*Filter' --type cs

Length of output: 322


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search migrations for CreateIndex with quoted identifiers, showing context
rg 'CreateIndex.*filter: .*["].*["]' -A 2 --type cs

# Check entity configurations for index definitions with filters
rg 'HasIndex.*Filter' -A 2 --type cs

# Find all migration files to ensure we don't miss any index patterns
fd --extension cs --full-path '.*Migrations.*'

Length of output: 5513


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the latest migration
cat "src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Infrastructure/Persistence/Migrations/20250117113218_AddIdempotentKey.cs"

# Double check for any other filter conditions in migrations
rg 'filter:' --type cs -A 2

Length of output: 2073

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d4b32ce and 9fb5399.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql (1 hunks)
  • docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (5 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs (2 hunks)
  • tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/all-tests.js (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • docs/schema/V1/schema.verified.graphql
  • tests/k6/tests/serviceowner/all-tests.js
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Queries/Search/SearchDialogQuery.cs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy migration job to test
  • GitHub Check: build / build-and-test
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json (4)

3446-3450: Property definition needs improvements.

The same improvements suggested for the CreateDialogCommand schema apply here.


4102-4106: Property definition needs improvements.

The same improvements suggested for the CreateDialogCommand schema apply here.


5940-5942: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add description and schema for the 409 Conflict response.

The 409 Conflict response should include a description and schema to help API consumers handle duplicate idempotentId cases properly.

Apply this diff to enhance the response definition:

   "409": {
-    "description": "Dialog with IdempotentKey 01941821-ffca-73a1-9335-435a882be014 has already been created."
+    "description": "A dialog with the provided idempotentId already exists.",
+    "content": {
+      "application/problem+json": {
+        "schema": {
+          "$ref": "#/components/schemas/ProblemDetails"
+        }
+      }
+    }
   }

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


5619-5627: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve query parameter description and naming.

The query parameter needs a more descriptive explanation of its filtering behavior and should use consistent naming.

Apply this diff to improve the parameter:

           {
-            "description": "Filter by IdempotentKey ",
+            "description": "Filter dialogs by their idempotentId. Returns dialogs that exactly match the provided identifier.",
-            "name": "idempotentKey",
+            "name": "idempotentId",
             "in": "query",
             "schema": {
               "nullable": true,
               "type": "string"
             }
           },

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

docs/schema/V1/swagger.verified.json Show resolved Hide resolved
if (request.IdempotentKey is not null && !string.IsNullOrEmpty(dialog.Org))
{
var dialogId = await _db.Dialogs
.Where(x => x.IdempotentKey == request.IdempotentKey && x.Org == dialog.Org)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: The order of the checks should probably match that of the composite index definition. However, as we're using a simple comparison, the order of the checks here should be handled by the optimizer in PostgreSQL such that it doesn't make any difference. For a inequality check (>, <, BETWEEN), the order would be significant, so I think it's generally best to always match the order.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (1)

Line range hint 147-188: Consider optimizing multiple database queries.

The EnsureNoExistingUserDefinedIds method makes multiple separate database calls to check for existing IDs. Consider combining these queries to reduce database round trips.

Example approach:

- var existingDialogIds = await _db.GetExistingIds([dialog], cancellationToken);
- var existingActivityIds = await _db.GetExistingIds(dialog.Activities, cancellationToken);
- var existingTransmissionIds = await _db.GetExistingIds(dialog.Transmissions, cancellationToken);
+ var (existingDialogIds, existingActivityIds, existingTransmissionIds) = 
+     await Task.WhenAll(
+         _db.GetExistingIds([dialog], cancellationToken),
+         _db.GetExistingIds(dialog.Activities, cancellationToken),
+         _db.GetExistingIds(dialog.Transmissions, cancellationToken)
+     );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9fb5399 and 72e11e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (3 hunks)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Update/UpdateDialogCommand.cs (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Update/UpdateDialogCommand.cs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: build / build-and-test
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs

[failure] 118-118:
'CreateDialogCommand' does not contain a definition for 'IdempotentKey' and no accessible extension method 'IdempotentKey' accepting a first argument of type 'CreateDialogCommand' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)


[failure] 118-118:
'CreateDialogCommand' does not contain a definition for 'IdempotentKey' and no accessible extension method 'IdempotentKey' accepting a first argument of type 'CreateDialogCommand' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy service to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy graphql to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy web-api-so to test
  • GitHub Check: Dry run deploy apps / Deploy web-api-eu to test
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/ServiceOwner/Dialogs/Commands/Create/CreateDialogCommand.cs (2)

99-117: LGTM: Optimized query and proper error handling.

The implementation:

  1. Uses an optimized query by selecting only the ID
  2. Returns 409 Conflict for better client experience
  3. Has proper error handling for unique constraint violations

Note: There is a known race condition that will be addressed in #1715 by replacing manual pre-insert collision checks with exception middleware.


18-28: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix build error: Missing IdempotentKey property.

The code references request.IdempotentKey, but the property is not defined in CreateDialogCommand. Since CreateDialogCommand inherits from CreateDialogDto, ensure that IdempotentKey is properly defined in the DTO class.

Run this script to verify the property definition:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants