Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify definitions of next_function and its variant parameter #973

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Apr 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

greg7mdp
Copy link
Contributor

@greg7mdp greg7mdp commented Apr 5, 2023

This is in preparation for the changes for issue #698.

I have figured out a way to implement issue #698 with minimal code changes, but it requires changing a function type (and its variant parameter) that is used throughout our code.

Because these types are defined in many locations, I wanted to have a first PR with no functional changes, just to make sure that the type is defined in a single location in our code. The benefit is that it should be easy to see that this PR, even though it has many changes, does not change any behavior.

@greg7mdp greg7mdp requested review from heifner and linh2931 April 5, 2023 17:33
@greg7mdp greg7mdp requested a review from vladtr April 6, 2023 15:37
@greg7mdp greg7mdp merged commit f31e527 into main Apr 7, 2023
@greg7mdp greg7mdp deleted the gh-698 branch April 7, 2023 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants