Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid watermark checks for Proper IF Blocks #9

Closed
arhag opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #55
Closed

Avoid watermark checks for Proper IF Blocks #9

arhag opened this issue Apr 5, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #55
Assignees
Labels
👍 lgtm OCI Work exclusive to OCI team

Comments

@arhag
Copy link
Member

arhag commented Apr 5, 2024

No description provided.

@arhag arhag added the 👍 lgtm label Apr 5, 2024
@arhag arhag removed the triage label Apr 5, 2024
@arhag arhag transferred this issue from AntelopeIO/leap Apr 10, 2024
@arhag arhag added this to the Savanna: Production-Ready milestone Apr 10, 2024
@arhag arhag changed the title IF: Avoid watermark checks for Proper IF Blocks Avoid watermark checks for Proper IF Blocks Apr 10, 2024
@heifner heifner self-assigned this Apr 19, 2024
@heifner heifner added the OCI Work exclusive to OCI team label Apr 19, 2024
@heifner heifner moved this from Todo to In Progress in Team Backlog Apr 19, 2024
heifner added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2024
@heifner heifner linked a pull request Apr 19, 2024 that will close this issue
@heifner heifner moved this from In Progress to Awaiting Review in Team Backlog Apr 19, 2024
heifner added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 19, 2024
IF: Do not use watermarks for savanna
@heifner heifner closed this as completed Apr 19, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Awaiting Review to Done in Team Backlog Apr 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
👍 lgtm OCI Work exclusive to OCI team
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants