Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Updating FunctionsNetHost (dotnet isolated worker) to 1.0.10 #10340

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2024
Merged

Updating FunctionsNetHost (dotnet isolated worker) to 1.0.10 #10340

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

kshyju
Copy link
Member

@kshyju kshyju commented Jul 29, 2024

Updated dotnet-isolated worker to 1.0.10, which brings in the below change.

Pull request checklist

IMPORTANT: Currently, changes must be backported to the in-proc branch to be included in Core Tools and non-Flex deployments.

  • Backporting to the in-proc branch is not required
    • Otherwise: Link to backporting PR - will follow
  • My changes do not require documentation changes
    • Otherwise: Documentation issue linked to PR
  • My changes should not be added to the release notes for the next release
    • Otherwise: I've added my notes to release_notes.md
  • My changes do not need to be backported to a previous version
    • Otherwise: Backport tracked by issue/PR #issue_or_pr - will follow
  • My changes do not require diagnostic events changes
    • Otherwise: I have added/updated all related diagnostic events and their documentation (Documentation issue linked to PR)
  • I have added all required tests (Unit tests, E2E tests)

@kshyju
Updated dotnet-isolated worker to 1.0.10
3a423c1 
  - Removing WEBSITE_CONTAINER_READY=0 env variable check for DotnetIsolatedLinuxPlaceholder profile
@kshyju kshyju marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2024 16:03
@kshyju kshyju requested a review from a team as a code owner July 30, 2024 16:03
pragnagopa
pragnagopa approved these changes Jul 30, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@pragnagopa pragnagopa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updating build.props with new version of host will come as a separate PR?

@kshyju
Copy link
Member Author

kshyju commented Jul 30, 2024

Updating build.props with new version of host will come as a separate PR?

Will do that in hotfix branch.

@kshyju kshyju merged commit 6a22f1f into dev Jul 30, 2024
10 checks passed
@kshyju kshyju deleted the shkr/fnh_1.0.10 branch July 30, 2024 17:51
kshyju added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
@kshyju
Updating FunctionsNetHost (dotnet isolated worker) to 1.0.10 (#10340)
57ad018 
- Removing WEBSITE_CONTAINER_READY=0 env variable check for DotnetIsolatedLinuxPlaceholder profile
@kshyju kshyju mentioned this pull request Jul 30, 2024
Merged
kshyju added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
@kshyju
Updating FunctionsNetHost (dotnet isolated worker) to 1.0.10 (#10340)
52bf077 
- Removing WEBSITE_CONTAINER_READY=0 env variable check for DotnetIsolatedLinuxPlaceholder profile
kshyju added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
@kshyju
Updating FunctionsNetHost (dotnet isolated worker) to 1.0.10 (#10340) (…
fd76fee 
…#10343)

- Removing WEBSITE_CONTAINER_READY=0 env variable check for DotnetIsolatedLinuxPlaceholder profile
kshyju added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
@kshyju
Updating FunctionsNetHost (dotnet isolated worker) to 1.0.10 (#10340) (…
1809417 
…#10343)

- Removing WEBSITE_CONTAINER_READY=0 env variable check for DotnetIsolatedLinuxPlaceholder profile
kshyju added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2024
@kshyju
4.35.2 release prep (4.35.1 + PR #10343 + Version update) (#10351)
27a14df 
* Updating FunctionsNetHost (dotnet isolated worker) to 1.0.10 (#10340) (#10343)

- Removing WEBSITE_CONTAINER_READY=0 env variable check for DotnetIsolatedLinuxPlaceholder profile

* Bump patch version number to 2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@zahalzel zahalzel zahalzel approved these changes

@jviau jviau jviau approved these changes

@fabiocav fabiocav fabiocav approved these changes

@pragnagopa pragnagopa pragnagopa approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@kshyju @pragnagopa @fabiocav @jviau @zahalzel