Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Downgrade MXE GCC to 9.3" #53833

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2021
Merged

Revert "Downgrade MXE GCC to 9.3" #53833

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2021

Conversation

BrettDong
Copy link
Member

Summary

None

Purpose of change

Describe the solution

Revert back to GCC 11 due to a suspected GCC 9 compiler bug.

Additional context

See #53825 (comment)

@github-actions github-actions bot added astyled astyled PR, label is assigned by github actions json-styled JSON lint passed, label assigned by github actions labels Dec 28, 2021
@BrettDong BrettDong added (P1 - Critical) Highest priority (for ex. crash fixes) Code: Build Issues regarding different builds and build environments OS: Windows Issues related to Windows operating system and removed astyled astyled PR, label is assigned by github actions json-styled JSON lint passed, label assigned by github actions labels Dec 28, 2021
@ZhilkinSerg ZhilkinSerg merged commit d239083 into master Dec 28, 2021
@BrettDong BrettDong deleted the revert-53805-mxe-gcc branch December 28, 2021 16:21
@github-actions github-actions bot added the BasicBuildPassed This PR builds correctly, label assigned by github actions label Dec 28, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
BasicBuildPassed This PR builds correctly, label assigned by github actions Code: Build Issues regarding different builds and build environments OS: Windows Issues related to Windows operating system (P1 - Critical) Highest priority (for ex. crash fixes)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Update 2021-12-27-2151(pull request #53805) and later freeze the game
2 participants