Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remote node address implementation change #289

Merged

Conversation

cartoon-face
Copy link
Contributor

Previous implementation of this would cause a break. It seems it was put outside the namespace so that it could be used in the transfer command. Here, I've adjusted it so the variable comes over to the transfer command without loosing data.

krypt0x and others added 5 commits February 21, 2022 11:45
Changing this seems to break the build leading me to suspect it isn't implemented the right way, this hopefully fixes that issue
part 1 of 2
part 2 of 2
@AxVultis AxVultis self-requested a review June 7, 2022 20:14
Copy link
Member

@AxVultis AxVultis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

All good, great work

@AxVultis AxVultis merged commit e8a3d31 into ConcealNetwork:development Jun 8, 2022
@cartoon-face cartoon-face added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 29, 2022
@cartoon-face cartoon-face added the fixes bug fixes label Aug 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request fixes bug fixes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants