Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use t8_cmesh_set_attribute in t8_cmesh_set_attribute_gloidx_array and set_vertices #1005

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

holke
Copy link
Collaborator

@holke holke commented Mar 27, 2024

Describe your changes here:
t8_cmesh_set_attribute_gloidx_array and t8_cmesh_set_vertices used t8_stash_add_attribute instead of t8_cmesh_set_attribute.
this prevented the error handling in t8_cmesh_set_attribute to be checked (introduced in #972).

we changed it to call t8_cmesh_set_attribute.

All these boxes must be checked by the reviewers before merging the pull request:

As a reviewer please read through all the code lines and make sure that the code is fully understood, bug free, well-documented and well-structured.

General

  • The reviewer executed the new code features at least once and checked the results manually

  • The code follows the t8code coding guidelines

  • New source/header files are properly added to the Makefiles

  • The code is well documented

  • All function declarations, structs/classes and their members have a proper doxygen documentation

  • All new algorithms and data structures are sufficiently optimal in terms of memory and runtime (If this should be merged, but there is still potential for optimization, create a new issue)

Tests

  • The code is covered in an existing or new test case using Google Test

Github action

  • The code compiles without warning in debugging and release mode, with and without MPI (this should be executed automatically in a github action)

  • All tests pass (in various configurations, this should be executed automatically in a github action)

    If the Pull request introduces code that is not covered by the github action (for example coupling with a new library):

    • Should this use case be added to the github action?
    • If not, does the specific use case compile and all tests pass (check manually)

Scripts and Wiki

  • If a new directory with source-files is added, it must be covered by the script/find_all_source_files.scp to check the indentation of these files.
  • If this PR introduces a new feature, it must be covered in an example/tutorial and a Wiki article.

Licence

  • The author added a BSD statement to doc/ (or already has one)

@holke holke added the next release For the next release label Mar 27, 2024
@holke holke marked this pull request as draft March 29, 2024 07:57
@Davknapp Davknapp assigned Davknapp and unassigned Davknapp Apr 2, 2024
Instead of calling the stash attribute setter directly
we use set_attribute.
This way, we ensure that the error checking in set_attribute
is executed.
@holke holke marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2024 08:50
@holke holke changed the title Use t8_cmesh_set_attribute in t8_cmesh_set_attribute_gloidx_array Use t8_cmesh_set_attribute in t8_cmesh_set_attribute_gloidx_array and set_vertices Apr 2, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@Davknapp Davknapp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you merge with the current main to retrigger the spelling-check?

@Davknapp Davknapp assigned holke and unassigned Davknapp Apr 2, 2024
@holke holke enabled auto-merge April 2, 2024 10:01
@holke
Copy link
Collaborator Author

holke commented Apr 2, 2024

Can you merge with the current main to retrigger the spelling-check?

Done

@holke holke assigned Davknapp and unassigned holke Apr 2, 2024
@holke holke merged commit a315a1f into main Apr 2, 2024
8 checks passed
@holke holke deleted the feature-923_cmesh_add_attr_error branch April 2, 2024 10:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
next release For the next release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants