-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Definition of ducts #768
Comments
I don't know if this serves any use case, but I was wondering: Would it make sense to have the duct elements on the same level as the ductAssemblys and have the ductAssemblys reference duct elements by uid? That way you could re-use a duct element in more than one duct assembly... |
@CLiersch @rmaierl @AntonReiswich @sdeinert I just wanted to tag you guys here. |
The proposal of @joergbrech sounds as a good idea to me. Imagine two engines sharing a <duct> element. |
- ducts element in configuration before fuselage and wing type fixes issue in tigl - ducts are defined on the same level as ductAssemblies to make them reusable - ductAssemblies reference ducts via UID to make ducts reusable - sections element in ductType before segments fixes issue in tigl addresses DLR-SL#768
We changed the definition in #774 accordingly and used this as a basis for our implementation in TiGL. |
Implemented |
I would like to announce that the TiGL development is currently fokusing on ducts (see DLR-SC/tigl#881), i.e. fuselage-like bodies which are substracted from the aircraft fuselage and wings:
The work is currently based on the following XSD extension (see
duct
branch):Everyone is invited to contribute to this effort with comments, ideas or identification of possible problems, either here or at DLR-SC/tigl#881.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: