Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some modifications in ducts definition #774

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

joergbrech
Copy link
Contributor

During the implementation of ducts in TiGL (DLR-SC/tigl#889) we made some modifications in the current ducts definition. Firstly, we now have ducts and ductAssemblys at the same level under the ductsType and ductAssemblys reference a duct via UID. This way, ducts can be reused by more than one ductAssembly. Finally, we reordered the elements in two xsd:all elements to fix some issues with the order of reading the CPACS files via the routines provided by https://github.com/RISCSoftware/cpacs_tigl_gen.

Concretely,

  • ducts element in configuration before fuselage and wing type fixes issue in tigl
  • ducts are defined on the same level as ductAssemblies to make them reusable
  • ductAssemblies reference ducts via UID to make ducts reusable
  • sections element in ductType before segments fixes issue in tigl

addresses #768

 - ducts element in configuration before fuselage and wing type fixes issue in tigl
 - ducts are defined on the same level as ductAssemblies to make them reusable
 - ductAssemblies reference ducts via UID to make ducts reusable
 - sections element in ductType before segments fixes issue in tigl

addresses DLR-SL#768
@joergbrech joergbrech mentioned this pull request Apr 21, 2022
@MarAlder
Copy link
Collaborator

MarAlder commented Aug 7, 2023

Having some difficulties in resolving conflicts. I manually aligned with your implementation via 00d643d and will close this merge request.

@MarAlder MarAlder closed this Aug 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants