Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2022. It is now read-only.

Function body code size test #7947

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 23, 2019
Merged

Function body code size test #7947

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
155ced2
Add test for function body code size
jeffreyssmith2nd Sep 16, 2019
afff0a2
Fix whitespace
jeffreyssmith2nd Sep 18, 2019
1135e22
Review feedback
jeffreyssmith2nd Sep 19, 2019
4d49dd4
Fix incorrect exception type and cleanup code
jeffreyssmith2nd Sep 20, 2019
3eac480
Fix function body size
jeffreyssmith2nd Sep 23, 2019
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
38 changes: 34 additions & 4 deletions unittests/wasm_tests.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -8,7 +8,10 @@
#include <eosio/chain/wast_to_wasm.hpp>
#include <eosio/testing/tester.hpp>

#include <Inline/Serialization.h>
#include <IR/Module.h>
#include <Runtime/Runtime.h>
#include <WASM/WASM.h>

#include <boost/test/unit_test.hpp>
#include <boost/algorithm/string/predicate.hpp>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -883,7 +886,6 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE( lotso_globals, TESTER ) try {
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(set_code(N(globals),
string(ss.str() + "(global $z (mut i64) (i64.const -12)))")
.c_str()), eosio::chain::wasm_execution_error);

} FC_LOG_AND_RETHROW()

BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE( offset_check, TESTER ) try {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1382,7 +1384,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE( lotso_stack_4, TESTER ) try {
ss << "(local i32)";
ss << " )";
ss << ")";
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(set_code(N(stackz), ss.str().c_str()), fc::exception);
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(set_code(N(stackz), ss.str().c_str()), wasm_serialization_error);
produce_blocks(1);
}
} FC_LOG_AND_RETHROW()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1445,7 +1447,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE( lotso_stack_7, TESTER ) try {
ss << "(param i32)";
ss << " )";
ss << ")";
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(set_code(N(stackz), ss.str().c_str()), fc::exception);
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(set_code(N(stackz), ss.str().c_str()), wasm_execution_error);
produce_blocks(1);
}
} FC_LOG_AND_RETHROW()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1486,7 +1488,7 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE( lotso_stack_9, TESTER ) try {
ss << "(local f32)";
ss << " )";
ss << ")";
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(set_code(N(stackz), ss.str().c_str()), fc::exception);
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(set_code(N(stackz), ss.str().c_str()), wasm_execution_error);
produce_blocks(1);
}
} FC_LOG_AND_RETHROW()
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1843,6 +1845,34 @@ BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE( depth_tests, TESTER ) try {

} FC_LOG_AND_RETHROW()

// TODO: Update to use eos-vm once merged
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't want to have to update tests, just because the implementation changes.

BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE( code_size ) try {
using namespace IR;
using namespace Runtime;
using namespace Serialization;
std::vector<U8> code_start = {
0x00, 0x61, 0x73, 0x6d, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x07, 0x01, 0x60,
0x03, 0x7e, 0x7e, 0x7e, 0x00, 0x03, 0x02, 0x01, 0x00, 0x07, 0x09, 0x01,
0x05, 0x61, 0x70, 0x70, 0x6c, 0x79, 0x00, 0x00, 0x0a, 0x8b, 0x80, 0x80,
0x0a, 0x01, 0x86, 0x80, 0x80, 0x0a, 0x00
};

std::vector<U8> code_end = { 0x0b };

std::vector<U8> code_function_body;
code_function_body.insert(code_function_body.end(), wasm_constraints::maximum_code_size + 4, 0x01);

std::vector<U8> code;
code.insert(code.end(), code_start.begin(), code_start.end());
code.insert(code.end(), code_function_body.begin(), code_function_body.end());
code.insert(code.end(), code_end.begin(), code_end.end());

Module module;
Serialization::MemoryInputStream stream((const U8*)code.data(), code.size());
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(WASM::serialize(stream, module), FatalSerializationException);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really fond of testing internal components that are not directly visible to users. We don't really care about exactly where the restriction is enforced as long as the user-visible behavior is fixed.


} FC_LOG_AND_RETHROW()

// TODO: restore net_usage_tests
#if 0
BOOST_FIXTURE_TEST_CASE(net_usage_tests, tester ) try {
Expand Down