Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify reference to Ontology Repositories as "Semantic repository implementation" (SRI) #1

Closed
lewismc opened this issue Jul 27, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@lewismc
Copy link
Member

lewismc commented Jul 27, 2016

Comment from John Graybeal's comments at http://lists.deltaforce.net/pipermail/esip-semanticweb/2016/000656.html

Can we please change the wording to make the generic references different in some way (lower case, at a minimum; but “ESIP semantic repository implementation” for example would be entirely unambiguous, capitalized or not).

I would suggest we use Semantic Repository Implementation, therefore create the acronym SRI. This avoids conflicts with ESIP Semantic Repsiroty Implementation (ESRI).

@lewismc
Copy link
Member Author

lewismc commented Aug 4, 2016

This issue is addressed via Commit d3507dd

@lewismc lewismc closed this as completed Aug 4, 2016
@lewismc lewismc added this to the 1st Public Working Draft milestone Oct 10, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant