Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
|
Thanks, @sloosvel, great overview! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
By the way, is the 6th a holiday for you? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
In Sweden yes, it is the national day. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's also a holiday in here, I was just wondering if it would make sense to move the code freeze to Tuesday 7th. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's also a public holiday in Germany, so it might make sense to move the deadline. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi, The code freeze day has arrived and there are still 5 open pull requests that are missing an approval to get merged. It would be helpful if these could get tested and merged before the end of the day. Help regarding that is very much welcome, as I don't have the permission to approve all of them. The draft PRs and issues will be removed from the milestone as it is unlikely they will be finished for today. Feel free to add them back to future milestones when your work is ready. Thank you for the collaboration. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@ESMValGroup/esmvaltool-developmentteam This is a reminder that the feature freeze for version 2.6 of ESMValCore is scheduled for Tuesday 7th of June.
There are currently 19 open issues in the 2.6 milestone. 9 of these issues have an open PR linked to them that need to be reviewed:
volume_statistics#1545kg m-2 s-1<-->mm day-1) #1574accumulate_coordinate#1281axis_statisticsand improvedepth_integration#1589clip_timerangeto time dependent fx variables #1603It would be great to strive to have them merged before next Monday since the work they contain has already been developed.
The milestone also has PR that are currently marked as a draft:
Added new Extract surface preprocessor #1048Install allinstallpackages fromsetup.pyfrom conda-forge instead of pip #1542Style index.html #1337To the authors, please make sure your pull request is marked as ready for review if you want your work to be included in the upcoming release.
The following issues have been added to the 2.6 milestone but have no PR associated to them:
CMIP3 processing does not work in parallel mode #430Distributed ESMValTool #1128Move temporal 'regridding' from multi_model_statistics preprocessor to regrid_time preprocessor #744Suppress third party warnings in pytest #857Dataset problem: EC-Earth data keeps NEMO halo at the edges (possibly IPSL-CM5A-LR too) #863Area statistics won't work on data with lambert Conformal projection #1156Remove use of CDO for selecting the right variable in native model fixes #1180How should multi-model statistics handle daily data on different calendars? #1210fix_metadatasometimes only works in serial (at least) for CMIP3 #1247Recipe with many datasets may crash when run in parallel #1298Consider using a dask distributed cluster when computing many-cubes statistics or metrics #1335Review of existing custom table entries #1387Variable information from recipes overwritten by cmor table info when deriving custom variables #1388extract_levelsfails silently when scheme='nearest' or 'linear' and layer is shallower than shallowest point in z axis. #1493OBSTier1/ISCCP/clisccp_ISCCP_L3_V1.0_*on esmeval/JASMIN is slightly dodgy according to esmvaltool's CMOR checks #1238Making the multi-model statistics preprocessor lazy #781List of deprecations #1593--> moved to v2.7I would like to ask people involved in those issues to decide whether or not it's feasible to develop the work required to fix them for this upcoming release. If so, please open a PR with your work. If not, I will move them to the next milestone.
Finally, if there are any issues or PR that are ready but have not been listed, please make sure you add them to the milestone.
Thanks for your collaboration!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions