-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2023-11-09] [$500] BA - Part of the screen shakes when entering an address offline #29030
Comments
Triggered auto assignment to @CortneyOfstad ( |
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~016fd62647afbb5093 |
Bug0 Triage Checklist (Main S/O)
|
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @mollfpr ( |
Not reproduced in Prod 20231007_021853.mp4 |
👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open
|
Triggered auto assignment to @marcochavezf ( |
Well this is odd, I am unable to repro this. Can someone else repro this? Screen.Recording.2023-10-07.at.8.56.47.AM.mov |
@mountiny @marcochavezf I can quickly raise a PR for this deploy blocker if assigned, this comes from this PR ProposalPlease re-state the problem that we are trying to solve in this issue.Part of the screen under address line shakes when entering an address offline What is the root cause of that problem?In here, we'll show loading indicator after the user types in the search box. There'll be no result due to the user is offline, so the loading indicator will hide immediately. This causes the flickering What changes do you think we should make in order to solve the problem?We just need to return null here if the network is currently offline so that the loading will not display.
The same thing is already done for the What alternative solutions did you explore? (Optional)We can create an upstream fix to the |
@tienifr I will handle this. |
@mountiny This upstream fix will fix the problem |
@shubham1206agra Is this issue regression from your PR? If yes, then the assigned C+ in the PR should be assign to this issue. |
Not really a regression |
@mollfpr @shubham1206agra just checking to see where we are at with this — thanks! |
@CortneyOfstad The PR is merged and it's on QA now. |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.3.94-2 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2023-11-09. 🎊 After the hold period is over and BZ checklist items are completed, please complete any of the applicable payments for this issue, and check them off once done.
For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
Payment is set for tomorrow — @mollfpr and @shubham1206agra any update on the checklist above? |
No offending PR. The fix is on the upstream.
The regression step should be enough.
|
@CortneyOfstad Could you help with the payment summary? Thank you! |
Had to create a new job posting in Upwork — https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~015d08915af33b19fc @mollfpr @shubham1206agra I invited both of you to the knew job. Please let me know as soon as you both accept 👍 |
Hi @CortneyOfstad I'll do manual request in NewDot, so I just need the payment summary. Thank you! |
Done |
@marcochavezf, @CortneyOfstad, @mollfpr, @shubham1206agra Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
@marcochavezf, @CortneyOfstad, @mollfpr, @shubham1206agra Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
1 similar comment
@marcochavezf, @CortneyOfstad, @mollfpr, @shubham1206agra Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
Alright @shubham1206agra you have been paid! @mollfpr creating the payment summary now — sorry for the delay! |
Payment SummaryContributor that fixed the issue — @shubham1206agra paid $500 in Upwork as Contributor |
Regression test completed here — https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/336021 |
$500 payment approved for @mollfpr based on summary above. |
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
Expected Result:
The user enters the address without any visible errors
Actual Result:
Part of the screen under address line shakes when entering an address offline
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
Version Number: 1.3.79.3
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Bug6227938_1696617516574.Desktop-Offline-Address-Input-Screen-Shakes.mp4
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause-Internal Team
Slack conversation: @
View all open jobs on GitHub
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: