Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed no result found after selecting a address from the drop-down menu #27035

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Oct 5, 2023

Conversation

shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra commented Sep 8, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #25595
PROPOSAL: #25595 (comment)

Tests

  1. Navigate to Settings > Wallet > Add a debit card.
  2. Click "Billing address" and start typing any address.
  3. Choose an address from the available options.
  4. Click "Billing address" again once an address is selected.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console
  • Verify that once we start typing, we get a loading indicator (or Cargando in Spanish) in step 2
  • Verify that after selecting Billing address again in step 4, we don't see any No result found.

QA Steps

Same as Tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-09-08.at.9.13.02.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-09-08.at.9.20.01.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-09-08.at.9.23.43.PM.mov
Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-09-08.at.9.28.52.PM.mov
iOS
Screen.Recording.2023-09-08.at.9.34.05.PM.mov
Android
Screen.Recording.2023-09-08.at.10.04.02.PM.mov

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra requested a review from a team as a code owner September 8, 2023 15:39
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2023

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team September 8, 2023 15:39
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 8, 2023

@mananjadhav Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav Can you review this today?

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@shubham1206agra Apologies I was away for the weekend. I did test, and the Test steps work fine, but this particular case doesn't.

When I start searching or type only one letter, it momentarily shows No results found, before loading the results.

no-results-found.mov

I tried figuring out an easy fix but I can't see how. Can you fix it? I am now wondering if @Pujan92's solution of fixing it in the lib would be needed. Will wait for your fix before testing again.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra Apologies I was away for the weekend. I did test, and the Test steps work fine, but this particular case doesn't.

When I start searching or type only one letter, it momentarily shows No results found, before loading the results.
no-results-found.mov

I tried figuring out an easy fix but I can't see how. Can you fix it? I am now wondering if @Pujan92's solution of fixing it in the lib would be needed. Will wait for your fix before testing again.

@mananjadhav This issue is due to the synchronous nature of API calls in lib. I also checked that @Pujan92's solution did not work for the above issue. I think we should do nothing about this as this may introduce regression in other areas, and it's a minor issue.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav ?

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@AndrewGable Can you please check this case and confirm if this is fine?

@AndrewGable
Copy link
Contributor

Does this happen on the existing build?

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes it does @AndrewGable

@AndrewGable
Copy link
Contributor

It would be really nice to fix this, how complex would the solution be?

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

shubham1206agra commented Sep 18, 2023

It would be really nice to fix this, how complex would the solution be?

It will require patching upstream, with not so sure solution. I think we should directly open upstream PR for this as patching locally might create some problems.

Which can be done after we merge this PR as a follow up

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@AndrewGable Our current approach won't work, and then we'll have to fix it upstream. I won't say it is complex, the idea is to expose the props while the API is being fetched.

@AndrewGable
Copy link
Contributor

We have our own fork so fixing upstream seems like just as easy to fix it the "right" way as this PR. I am happy to help make sure it is deployed correctly, etc.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav Please decide in that case, and if upstream changes are needed, please create a fork so that I can work on that.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

Btw we need to fix this issue in short
FaridSafi/react-native-google-places-autocomplete#751

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Sep 20, 2023

Yes @shubham1206agra but the fix will be pushed in this forked repo

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am gonna close this one and reopen another PR when upstream changes are made

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am gonna reopen this PR. Looks like you also need these changes too!

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav You can start testing this PR

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

I feel like we can get rid of the text and only use the loading spinner, but we should vertically and horizontally center the spinner. cc @Expensify/design

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

shubham1206agra commented Oct 2, 2023

I will wait on FaridSafi/react-native-google-places-autocomplete#913 to be merged
This will fix the spinner

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

@shubham1206agra Did you get a chance to look at @shawnborton's comment? I think we want the wrapper to be equal to the width of the input (or the list items). No text and only spinner.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

I thought @shawnborton is verifying this with Design team.
@shawnborton What should be the ideal UI?
Can you clarify?

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

I think we're all good to move forward with just vertically and horizontally centering the loading spinner, no need for a text label.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mananjadhav Please complete the checklist now

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Oct 3, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web-address-search.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mweb-chrome-address-search.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
mweb-safari-address-search.mov
Desktop
desktop-address-search.mov
iOS
ios-address-search.mov
Android
android-address-search.mov

Thanks @shubham1206agra for the changes. This looks better. Thank you for taking this to the finish line.

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

mananjadhav commented Oct 3, 2023

@shubham1206agra

Okay I noticed one thing intermittently, I got two console errors. Can you please check. I think we're only left with this.

Screenshot 2023-10-04 at 12 12 38 AM Screenshot 2023-10-04 at 12 12 24 AM

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shubham1206agra

Okay I noticed one thing intermittently, I got two console errors. Can you please check. I think we're only left with this.

Screenshot 2023-10-04 at 12 12 38 AM Screenshot 2023-10-04 at 12 12 24 AM

This is another bug with the library
Can we create a separate ticket for the same?
Cause this is not really related to this

@mananjadhav
Copy link
Collaborator

Yeah not directly related to the change here, but good to fix. I'll let @AndrewGable decide. All good from my side.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AndrewGable Can you please review this?

@AndrewGable AndrewGable merged commit 23d5953 into Expensify:main Oct 5, 2023
14 checks passed
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Oct 5, 2023
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 5, 2023

@AndrewGable looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@AndrewGable
Copy link
Contributor

Tests were still running I guess, not emergency.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 5, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AndrewGable Can you create an issue for this?
#27035 (comment)

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 6, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.79-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@AndrewGable
Copy link
Contributor

I'd report these via #expensify-bugs Slack channel

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.79-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.79-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 cancelled 🔪
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Oct 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 1.3.79-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@shubham1206agra shubham1206agra deleted the fix-25595 branch February 6, 2024 03:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants