Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Fix]: URL isn't fully visible in the tooltip #12408

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2022

Conversation

fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh commented Nov 2, 2022

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #11486
PROPOSAL: #11486 (comment)

Tests & QA Steps

test 1 : Long URL

  1. Navigate to any chat
  2. Send a long URL : select from list
  1. Hover
  2. The whole Url is visible

Test 2 : Pin / Upin

  1. Open any chat
  2. Hover over "Pin" icon and press it.
  3. The Unpin tooltip should be in one line without being trimmed/wrapped

Test 3 : Copy Email/Phone no.

  1. Open Desktop Website/App
  2. Navigate to Chat > Details
  3. Copy Email/Phone no.
  4. The Copy to clipboard text should be in one line without being trimmed/wrapped
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots

Web

Web - Safari
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/36869046/199615934-27c3d7c3-7147-4ee5-be6b-100e975f6e30.mov

Web - Chrome
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/36869046/199616069-6d1b869b-935c-4e37-9560-7836a98c2855.mov

Web - Firefox
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/36869046/199616362-a9760aa6-7c18-4212-8671-0cdb8264e4c1.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

mWeb.Chrome.webm

Mobile Web - Safari

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.13.-.2022-11-03.at.12.29.00.mp4

Desktop

w_115226f14fcd6641e5b83fef04d6916d816dca77.mov

iOS

Native.-.IOS.mov

Android

Native.-.Android.mov

@fedirjh fedirjh requested a review from a team as a code owner November 2, 2022 22:47
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from sobitneupane and thienlnam and removed request for a team November 2, 2022 22:47
Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fedirjh Please Add screenshots for native and mWeb as well. We just want to make sure that the changes made here do not crash them.

Please add test steps for tooltips of Pin/Unpin and Copy to clipboard/copied as well.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor Author

fedirjh commented Nov 3, 2022

@fedirjh Please Add screenshots for native and mWeb as well. We just want to make sure that the changes made here do not crash them.

Please add test steps for tooltips of Pin/Unpin and Copy to clipboard/copied as well.

@sobitneupane Tooltip doesn't work on mobile or native
#10504 (comment)

// We can't use the common component for the Tooltip as Web implementation uses DOM specific method to
// render the View which is not present on the Mobile.

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

sobitneupane commented Nov 3, 2022

Tooltip doesn't work on mobile or native

@fedirjh Yes, You are right. We just want to make sure that changes do not crash or produce any console errors in native app/ mWeb.

We just want to make sure that the changes made here do not crash them.

@fedirjh

This comment was marked as resolved.

@fedirjh fedirjh requested review from sobitneupane and removed request for thienlnam November 3, 2022 13:45
@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor Author

fedirjh commented Nov 3, 2022

@sobitneupane can you request review from @thienlnam too ?

@sobitneupane
Copy link
Contributor

sobitneupane commented Nov 3, 2022

@fedirjh Can you please add those native and mWeb Screenshots in PR body.

Also you might have missed the below comment. Please update test steps in PR body to address the following.

Please add test steps for tooltips of Pin/Unpin and Copy to clipboard/copied as well.

@sobitneupane can you request review from @thienlnam too ?

It's a known issue (On re-requesting review, other reviewer is being removed). But I cannot request review. Once done with my review. I will let him know.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor Author

fedirjh commented Nov 3, 2022

@fedirjh Can you please add those native and mWeb Screenshots in PR body.

Please add test steps for tooltips of Pin/Unpin and Copy to clipboard/copied as well.

@sobitneupane done .

It's a known issue (On re-requesting review, other reviewer is being removed). But I cannot request review. Once done with my review. I will let him know.

Alright

Copy link
Contributor

@sobitneupane sobitneupane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thienlnam Changes look good and test well on all platforms.
🎀👀🎀 C+ reviewed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots

Web

Untitled.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

Desktop

Screen.Recording.2022-11-04.at.21.27.55.mov

iOS

Android

Comment on lines +80 to +83

// Reset the tooltip text width to 0 so that we can measure it again.
// eslint-disable-next-line react/no-did-update-set-state
this.setState({tooltipTextWidth: 0}, this.updateTooltipTextWidth);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This lint is correct - the placement of this is not ideal as we're adding infinite re-renders here
Can you find a better placement to reset the tooltip text width?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    if (prevProps.text === this.props.text) {
          return;
      }

this line will prevent the infinite re-rendering , we are only updating tooltipTextWidth , once , when text changes

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah good point, missed that

Comment on lines +80 to +83

// Reset the tooltip text width to 0 so that we can measure it again.
// eslint-disable-next-line react/no-did-update-set-state
this.setState({tooltipTextWidth: 0}, this.updateTooltipTextWidth);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah good point, missed that

@thienlnam thienlnam merged commit d6bac25 into Expensify:main Nov 4, 2022
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Nov 4, 2022
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 4, 2022

@thienlnam looks like this was merged without the checklist test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 4, 2022

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@mountiny mountiny added the FirstPick Engineering only, please! Only add when there is an identified code solution. label Nov 8, 2022
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Nov 8, 2022

Just testing something here.

@mountiny mountiny removed the FirstPick Engineering only, please! Only add when there is an identified code solution. label Nov 8, 2022
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 8, 2022

🚀 Deployed to staging by @thienlnam in version: 1.2.25-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 9, 2022

🚀 Deployed to production by @yuwenmemon in version: 1.2.25-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants