Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

prevent FAB menu and other page showing simultaneously #12655

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 15, 2022

Conversation

aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

Details

  1. clicking FAB icon as soon as opening other pages (click LHN row or Search or Avatar icon) (native, mWeb)
    Result: other page opens. do nothing on FAB icon click
  2. opening other pages (click LHN row or Search or Avatar icon) as soon as clicking FAB icon (native, mWeb)
    Result (native): FAB menu opens. don't open any other pages
    Result (mWeb): 2 scenarios in mWeb since web is super fast in state change:
  • FAB menu opens and quickly disappears and don't open any other pages because 2nd action is considered as modal dismiss
  • FAB menu opens but quickly disappears before other pages are fully loaded. this case, 2nd action is considered as opening other page
  1. opening other pages from shortcut key after FAB menu is open (web, desktop)
    Result: FAB menu is closed while opening any other page

Fixed Issues

$ #11229
PROPOSAL: #11229 (comment), #11229 (comment)

Tests

Login with any account

Scenario 1:

  1. From LHN page, tap on any chat row and quickly tap on FAB icon
  2. Verify that Report page is opened and popup menu never shows

Scenario 2:

  1. From LHN page, tap on Search/Avatar icon and quickly tap on FAB icon
  2. Verify that Search/Settings page is opened and popup menu never shows

Scenario 3:

  1. From LHN page, tap on FAB icon and quickly tap on any chat row
  2. Verify that popup menu shows and Report page is never opened

Scenario 4:

  1. From LHN page, tap on FAB icon and quickly tap on Search/Avatar icon
  2. Verify that popup menu shows and Search/Settings page is never opened

Scenario 5:

  1. Tap on FAB icon to open popup menu
  2. Press Command + K
  3. Verify that popup menu is closed while opening search page

NOTE: Scenario 1-4 is for mobile, Scenario 5 is for web/desktop

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

QA Steps

Scenario 1:

  1. From LHN page, tap on any chat row and quickly tap on FAB icon
  2. Verify that Report page is opened and popup menu never shows

Scenario 2:

  1. From LHN page, tap on Search/Avatar icon and quickly tap on FAB icon
  2. Verify that Search/Settings page is opened and popup menu never shows

Scenario 3:

  1. From LHN page, tap on FAB icon and quickly tap on any chat row
  2. Verify that popup menu shows and Report page is never opened

Scenario 4:

  1. From LHN page, tap on FAB icon and quickly tap on Search/Avatar icon
  2. Verify that popup menu shows and Search/Settings page is never opened

Scenario 5:

  1. Tap on FAB icon to open popup menu
  2. Press Command + K
  3. Verify that popup menu is closed while opening search page

NOTE: Scenario 1-4 is for mobile, Scenario 5 is for web/desktop

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

PR Reviewer Checklist

The reviewer will copy/paste it into a new comment and complete it after the author checklist is completed

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots

Web

web.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

mchrome.mp4

Mobile Web - Safari

msafari.mp4

Desktop

desktop.mov

iOS

ios.mp4

Android

android.mp4

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif requested a review from a team as a code owner November 10, 2022 21:59
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Beamanator and parasharrajat and removed request for a team November 10, 2022 21:59
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 10, 2022

@Beamanator @parasharrajat One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Bump @parasharrajat anything we're waiting on here?

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Yup, for the weekend to be over. I will review this tomorrow. I already tested a few things but need to do the cross-platform testing.

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Aah makes sense, thanks @parasharrajat 😆

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor Author

As a reminder, it's the last business day by when 50% bonus is applied on merge?

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Reviewing now.

@@ -121,7 +134,7 @@ class SidebarLinks extends React.Component {
accessibilityLabel={this.props.translate('sidebarScreen.buttonSearch')}
accessibilityRole="button"
style={[styles.flexRow, styles.ph5]}
onPress={this.showSearchPage}
onPress={() => this.showSearchPage()}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Revert it please.

Suggested change
onPress={() => this.showSearchPage()}
onPress={this.showSearchPage}

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did this because this. is used in showSearchPage.
Or we can bind this function. What do you prefer?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bind it and use it.

Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SEARCH);
}

showReportPage(reportID) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing jsDoc.

Only Param needs to be defined.

return false;
}

isInactive() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is Inactive what? Can we think of a better name? Functions are named on what they do not where they are called.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this component (BaseSidebarScreen) inactive? Meaning screen is blurred because of other pages open
Maybe better to name isScreenInactive?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, what about isSidebarScreenHidden?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screen is actually not hidden on web. just blurred by another modal

this.hideCreateMenu();
}

didBecomeInactive(prevProps) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same for it. A better name is needed. Functions are named on what they do not where they are called.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe better to name didScreenBecomeInactive?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Beamanator thoughts? I am not good with name.. 🐈

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Honestly I'd rather not negate a negative - we're checking if the outcome of this function is false (!this.didBecomeInactive(prevProps)) and the function name is about something being "inactive" - it's clearer to check if something is active (instead of not inactive)

So how about this name: checkSidebarScreenNewlyVisible? I know it's a long name but explains the purpose of the function, I believe

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think to check if something is active cannot be used here.
We check if screen just became inactive from active status.
What is the best naming after inverting this?
Screen is active or Screen just became active cannot be opposite of Screen just became inactive

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Opposite of Screen just became inactive will be combination of

  • Screen just became active
  • Screen keeps active
  • Screen keeps inactive

Comment on lines +134 to +136
if (!this.state.isCreateMenuActive) {
return;
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes to avoid unnecessary call when press shortcut key without opening popup menu

@@ -193,4 +243,4 @@ class BaseSidebarScreen extends Component {
BaseSidebarScreen.propTypes = propTypes;
BaseSidebarScreen.defaultProps = defaultProps;

export default withDrawerState(BaseSidebarScreen);
export default withDrawerState(withNavigationFocus(BaseSidebarScreen));
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Use compose instead.

@@ -116,6 +165,7 @@ class BaseSidebarScreen extends Component {
onAvatarClick={this.navigateToSettings}
isSmallScreenWidth={this.props.isSmallScreenWidth}
isDrawerOpen={this.props.isDrawerOpen}
isMenuOpen={this.state.isCreateMenuActive}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
isMenuOpen={this.state.isCreateMenuActive}
isCreateMenuOpen={this.state.isCreateMenuActive}

Comment on lines 120 to 126
navigateToSettings() {
if (this.state.isCreateMenuActive) {
// Prevent opening Settings page when click profile avatar quickly after clicking FAB icon
return;
}
Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.SETTINGS);
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a possibility that we can move it inside the sidebarLinks component.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, similar to Search page

}

didBecomeInactive(prevProps) {
// When Report page is just opened
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// When Report page is just opened
// When the Drawer gets closed and ReportScreen is shown

return true;
}

// When other page is just opened
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// When other page is just opened
// When other page is opened over LHN.

}

isInactive() {
// When drawer is closed and Report page is open
Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat Nov 15, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is difference between didBecomeInactive and this funciton. Why can't we use didBecomeInactive after combining those?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

didBecomeInactive is just after screen is blurred. called only inside componentDidUpdate. so this is the event and called automatically when any props or state updated.
isInactive is when screen is already unfocused. so this is not the event but is manually called.
Hiding menu should be triggered at the event of screen blur. isInactive cannot be used here.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add JSDocs for both functions with details.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aimane-chnaif Can you please do this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@parasharrajat I think it's done in latest commit. What's missing?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comments for functions. There is no details about these functions and how they are used.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please check now

Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Beamanator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added some thoughts & ideas for function names

return true;
}

// When other page is open
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This returns true if any other page is open? Or a specific page? Let's be a bit clearer here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

correct. any other page is open except Report (this is handled with isDrawerOpen)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool so how about this

Suggested change
// When other page is open
// When any other page is open

return false;
}

isInactive() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, what about isSidebarScreenHidden?

this.hideCreateMenu();
}

didBecomeInactive(prevProps) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Honestly I'd rather not negate a negative - we're checking if the outcome of this function is false (!this.didBecomeInactive(prevProps)) and the function name is about something being "inactive" - it's clearer to check if something is active (instead of not inactive)

So how about this name: checkSidebarScreenNewlyVisible? I know it's a long name but explains the purpose of the function, I believe

Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Beamanator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall i like the new function names, what do you think @parasharrajat?

}

/**
* Check if LHN became inactive from active status
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* Check if LHN became inactive from active status
* Check if LHN status changed from active to inactive

* Check if LHN became inactive from active status
*
* @param {Object} prevProps
* @return {boolean}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following the style guide

Suggested change
* @return {boolean}
* @return {Boolean}

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor Author

PR is now settled for new review

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Testing.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Waiting on #12655

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

screen-2022-11-16_03.00.25.mp4

🔲 iOS / Safari

screen-2022-11-16_02.26.09.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

Screenshot 2022-11-16 02:35:09

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

screen-2022-11-16_02.14.06.mp4

🔲 Android / Chrome

screen-2022-11-16_02.13.10.mp4

🔲 Android / native

screen-2022-11-16_03.06.16.mp4

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

cc: @Beamanator

PR Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

@parasharrajat are you sure the checklist you just used was latest?

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Beamanator commented Nov 15, 2022

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • iOS / native
    • Android / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • Android / Chrome
    • MacOS / Chrome
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product was added in all src/languages/* files
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

See above

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Updated

@Beamanator Beamanator self-requested a review November 15, 2022 22:37
Copy link
Contributor

@Beamanator Beamanator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@Beamanator Beamanator merged commit b7a53f3 into Expensify:main Nov 15, 2022
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Nov 15, 2022
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 15, 2022

@Beamanator looks like this was merged without the checklist test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@Beamanator
Copy link
Contributor

Both checklists were definitely passing 🙃

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by @Beamanator in version: 1.2.29-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by @AndrewGable in version: 1.2.29-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants