Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: Create libs/ApiUtils #15178

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Mar 16, 2023
Merged

Conversation

kidroca
Copy link
Contributor

@kidroca kidroca commented Feb 15, 2023

Details

  • Introduce ApiUtils and ApiUtils.getApiRoot

Why?

https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C01GTK53T8Q/p1676320010253979
We build native apps using the PROD env config
The API is resolved dynamically at run time
But we also have the constant URL_API_ROOT which cannot always point to the correct API (it points to PROD)
Some ENVs (staging) allow for toggling between different APIs and a function like getApiRoot encapsulates
the checks we have to make when we want to use the root url

The staging toggle now works correctly on DEV and it can switch between the PRIMARY and STAGING APIs

Fixed Issues

$ #15087
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  • Verify staging and prod urls are resolved from API ROOT

  • Verify absolute urls are resolved from API ROOT

    • At the moment the backend is not yet saving attachments using the absolute path, so we need to simulate the result

    • We need to inspect and modify Onyx data

    • Find an attachment action and modify the html of the message so that the <img src="https://{env}.expensify.com/chat-attachments/{path}" /> part becomes <img src="/chat-attachments/{path}" />

      Example In Chrome dev console:
      Onyx.connect({ key: 'reportActions_71955477', callback: actions => {
          const action = actions[932];
          action.message[0].html = action.message[0].html.replace('https://staging.expensify.com/', '/');
          Onyx.merge('reportActions_71955477', { 932: action });
      }});
    • Now refresh the browser. The (modified) attachment should resolve and load successfully from API ROOT

  • Verify all attachment usages are covered. All these places should resolve the attachment from API ROOT

    • attachment thumbnail in chat message comments
    • attachment preview modal
    • attachment download button
    • use different attachment types - image formats / document formats
  • Settings / Preferences / Test Preferences - staging toggle works correctly on DEV and STAGING

  • Using the "Staging toggle" changes the attachment URLs

    • switching to the staging api and viewing attachment requests on the network tab should show staging.expensify.com/chat-attachments/... (or whatever STAGING_EXPENSIFY_URL address is configured in .env)
    • You can use Desktop to inspect this
  • Pusher functionality should be unaffected

    • there was a rename that touched Pusher code, but nothing was altered. Pusher should still subscribe and be able to receive new messages live
  • AddressSearch component functionality was refactored, verify GooglePlacesAutocomplete has no regression regarding the requestUrl parameter. The fields below should show autocomplete suggestions

Offline tests

Expected Offline behavior

  • Images that were seen recently should be visible and render instantly (from cache)
  • Images that haven't been already loaded would be blank

Expected slow internet behavior

  • Images that were seen recently should be visible and render instantly (from cache)
  • Other images would display a spinner / loader animation for a while until they load

QA Steps

Testing on STAGING

  1. Go to PRODUCTION and upload attachments
  2. Go to STAGING and view the uploaded attachments
  • Attachments should load successfully
  • Requests on the network tab should be directed to staging.expensify.com/chat-attachments/...
  • Upload different attachment types and verify they work
  • Upload attachments from STAGING - uploaded and viewing them should still work
  • Verify all attachment usages are covered. All these places should load and render successfully
    • attachment thumbnail in chat message comments
    • attachment preview modal
    • attachment download button
    • use different attachment types - image formats / document formats
  • Settings / Preferences / Test Preferences - Staging toggle is rendered and we can switch between PROD and STAGING API
  • Using the "Staging toggle" changes the attachment URLs
    • switching to the prod api and viewing attachment requests on the network tab should show www.expensify.com/chat-attachments/...
  • AddressSearch component functionality was refactored, verify address can still be autocomplete

Testing on PRODUCTION

After PR is merged to PROD

  1. Go to STAGING and upload attachments
  2. Go to PRODUCTION and view the uploaded attachments
  • Attachments should load successfully
  • Requests on the network tab should be directed to www.expensify.com/chat-attachments/...
  • Upload different attachment types and verify they work
  • Upload attachments from PRODUCTION - uploaded and viewing them should still work
  • Verify all attachment usages are covered. All these places should load and render successfully
    • attachment thumbnail in chat message comments
    • attachment preview modal
    • attachment download button
    • use different attachment types - image formats / document formats
  • Settings / Preferences / Test Preferences - staging toggle is not rendered on PROD
  • AddressSearch component functionality was refactored, verify address can still be autocomplete

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web Screenshot 2023-02-17 at 9 54 47
Mobile Web - Chrome

image

Mobile Web - Safari Screenshot 2023-02-17 at 9 57 37
Desktop Screenshot 2023-02-17 at 10 00 07
iOS Screenshot 2023-03-10 at 23 09 17 Screenshot 2023-03-10 at 23 12 11
Android

image
image
image

@MelvinBot
Copy link

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

Copy link
Contributor Author

@kidroca kidroca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've pointed out some usages of URL_API_ROOT that might be confusing or be set by mistake to the production API root, because URL_API_ROOT always points there

src/CONFIG.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/AddressSearch.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TestToolMenu.js Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TestToolMenu.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/HttpUtils.js Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/HttpUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/AppNavigator/AuthScreens.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/tryResolveUrlFromApiRoot.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/actions/ReportTest.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/ui/UnreadIndicatorsTest.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

cc @tgolen @marcaaron if you would want to review this too 🙌

@kidroca kidroca marked this pull request as ready for review February 17, 2023 08:41
@kidroca kidroca requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2023 08:41
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from ctkochan22 and Santhosh-Sellavel and removed request for a team February 17, 2023 08:41
@MelvinBot
Copy link

@Santhosh-Sellavel @ctkochan22 One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@kidroca
Copy link
Contributor Author

kidroca commented Feb 17, 2023

Added description, tests and QA tests and screenshots

✅ Ready for Review

We still need to decide what to do about the remaining direct usages of PRODUCTION_API_ROOT

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Just found there is this PR as well which is a bit stepping on our toes here https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/14944/files

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny Are we still reviewing this PR? Or wait until yours is merged?

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

@kidroca Can you please update the test steps here, instead of links?

@kidroca
Copy link
Contributor Author

kidroca commented Feb 21, 2023

@Santhosh-Sellavel

@kidroca Can you please update the test steps here, instead of links?

Done, but I think we should wait for the resolution of the PR here (which might call for additional changes on my PR):

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Cool, then can you update the title HOLD For the PR?

@mountiny mountiny changed the title Refactor: Create libs/ApiUtils [HOLD App#14944] Refactor: Create libs/ApiUtils Feb 22, 2023
@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Put this on hold, @ctkochan22 sorry was ooo on monday and tuesday

@ctkochan22
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny Looks like you got a handle on this review. I'm going to unassign and defer to you!

Copy link
Contributor Author

@kidroca kidroca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR is ready for review and testing ✅

Made some changes to be compatible with other PRs touching the same functionality
It was possible to remove the platform specific implementations for ApiUtils sub functionality

We are no longer blocked by:


Updated PR description and test sections to indicated the "Staging toggle" can be used in DEV
It would cause CORS issues (only on DEV), because the proxy server changes are not there yet. They will be handled in the follow of #15517

src/CONFIG.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/AppNavigator/AuthScreens.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/tryResolveUrlFromApiRoot.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@marcaaron marcaaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks pretty good. Just left some small ideas for improvements.

src/CONFIG.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/CONFIG.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/AddressSearch.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TestToolMenu.js Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/ApiUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/ApiUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/ApiUtils.js Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/ApiUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/Navigation/AppNavigator/AuthScreens.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/HttpUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kidroca kidroca changed the title [HOLD App#14944] Refactor: Create libs/ApiUtils Refactor: Create libs/ApiUtils Mar 7, 2023
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kidroca kidroca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a few detailed explanations, sorry if it's a bit too long

I can address most of the suggestions right now
But for a few I'll need a response from @marcaaron

src/libs/ApiUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/CONFIG.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/AddressSearch.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TestToolMenu.js Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/TestToolMenu.js Show resolved Hide resolved
}

if (typeof stagingServerToggleState !== 'boolean') {
return ENV_NAME === CONST.ENVIRONMENT.STAGING;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, though see this
https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/bb0b7883210a9aba510adf682363004d536e29b4/src/libs/ApiUtils.js#L10-L16

we want the default value for staging to be true, but we can't simply do this

let stagingServerToggleState = ENV_NAME === CONST.ENVIRONMENT.STAGING;

because the real ENV_NAME is resolved a few moments later

We can only do this:

let stagingServerToggleState = false;
Onyx.connect({
    key: ONYXKEYS.USER,
    callback: (val) => {
        const defaultValue = ENV_NAME === CONST.ENVIRONMENT.STAGING;
        stagingServerToggleState = lodashGet(val, 'shouldUseStagingServer', defaultValue);
    },
});

It's probably fine, but ENV_NAME is obtained async and it might not be updated in the Onyx.connect callback
IMO the safest is what we have right now
What do you think?

src/libs/Navigation/AppNavigator/AuthScreens.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/ApiUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/ApiUtils.js Show resolved Hide resolved
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Mar 10, 2023

@kidroca Is this test "Verify absolute urls are resolved from API ROOT" really required? The attachments urls will always be in a different (and correct) format due to the use of tryResolveUrlFromApiRoot.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Mar 11, 2023

  1. [Web Only] Offline tests fail; going Offline/Slow Connection will always load attachmnets from url and never from cache, this is also the current behaviour on staging. So this can be ignored? I had cache disabled.
  2. [Web Only] Using staging switch will cause CORS ([Staging API] To Use Staging Server or not to use staging server #15517 this PR has been revered). I guess this also have nothing to do with this PR?

Besides that, tests well!, checklist in the way...

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Mar 11, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is correct English and approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome

mweb-chrome

Mobile Web - Safari

mweb-safari

Desktop
desktop.mp4
iOS

ios

Android

android

@Prince-Mendiratta

This comment was marked as off-topic.

@kidroca
Copy link
Contributor Author

kidroca commented Mar 12, 2023

@kidroca Is this test "Verify absolute urls are resolved from API ROOT" really required? The attachments urls will always be in a different (and correct) format due to the use of tryResolveUrlFromApiRoot.

I'm not sure / I don't know - tryResolveUrlFromApiRoot was from my previous PR and this behavior was tested, but then we realized it didn't respect the "staging toggle"

This PR if a followup to maketryResolveUrlFromApiRoot respect the "staging toggle" and I added the same steps

  1. [Web Only] Offline tests fail; going Offline/Slow Connection will always load attachmnets from url and never from cache, this is also the current behaviour on staging. So this can be ignoreed?

I'm not sure how did you test that
I do this

  1. load a chat with attachments
  2. see thumbnails load (thumbnails get cached)
  3. open one of them (it gets cached)
  4. go to a different chat
  5. go offline
  6. go to chat with attachments again
  7. see thumbnails load
  8. open one of them - it loads
  9. open another one - it doesn't load (full image fails to load as it's not cached)
Screen.Recording.2023-03-12.at.11.53.20.mov

2. [Web Only] Using staging switch will cause CORS ([Staging API] To Use Staging Server or not to use staging server #15517 this PR has been revered). I guess this also have nothing to do with this PR?

That's correct, the followup to fix this is waiting on the current PR

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Mar 12, 2023

I'm not sure how did you test that

I think it's related to how the browser handle requests while offline, check the video for Web from the checklist above, I went offline differently than how you did. I think that's outside the scope of this PR since same behaviour is on staging and it may be actually a browser thing so nothing to worry about here. Just to be sure can you do the steps I have and confirm the same results

@kidroca
Copy link
Contributor Author

kidroca commented Mar 13, 2023

I think it's related to how the browser handle requests while offline, check the video for Web from the checklist above, I went offline differently than how you did.

You have dev tools open and cache disabled - that's why cache won't be used
You can untoggle the checkmark here, and see a request won't be made again
Screenshot 2023-03-13 at 14 35 54

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Mar 13, 2023

@kidroca Yeah, sorry my bad, I tend to disable cache for testing. So everything is actually as expected, as can be seen on the Desktop video.

Edit: I have updated the Web video

Move the logic inside the Onyx callback
src/libs/ApiUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/libs/ApiUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Abdelhafidh Belalia <16493223+s77rt@users.noreply.github.com>
s77rt
s77rt previously approved these changes Mar 13, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kidroca one comment, thank I will merge this, thanks!

src/components/TestToolMenu.js Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets do this

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 44f9871 into Expensify:main Mar 16, 2023
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented Mar 16, 2023

@mountiny Do we track payment for this in the linked issue or in another separated issue?

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@kidroca kidroca deleted the kidroca/refactor/api-root branch March 16, 2023 13:51
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.2.87-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.2.87-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.2.87-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants