Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Display report preview using new reportAction data source #18423

Merged
merged 49 commits into from
May 17, 2023

Conversation

cristipaval
Copy link
Contributor

@cristipaval cristipaval commented May 4, 2023

Details

Deprecates the old usages of IOUPreview, and introduces the new ReportPreview component. We show this beneath IOUPreviews, and its position changes so that it's always beneath the most recent preview.

Fixed Issues

$ https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/278890

Tests

Note: Please test with new users, as stale data will likely cause bugs

1) Test report creation and new component

  • Create a new 1:1 chat between userA and userB
  • Create a Request of any amount from userA to userB
  • In the ChatReport, both users should see 'UserB owes £1.23' beneath the IOUPreview
  • A new IOUReport should be created to hold the request, it should appear in the LHN
  • Within this report, the recipient should see a 'Pay' button beneath the 'User owes...' message

Additional Requests, and descriptions

  • Back in the chat report, create another request from userA to userB, this time with a description
  • The new IOUPreview should include the description
  • The 'owes £1.23' message should only display beneath the most recent IOUPreview only
  • When userB taps the payButton, it should take them to the IOUDetailsPage

Test settling up

  • UserB should settle the IOU (use Settled elsewhere as you won't have a bank set up for this new user)
  • Within the IOUreport, both users should see a 'settled up $153.84 elsewhere' message
  • The pay button should disappear from the 'Settled up'
  • Within the ChatReport, the settled up message should show a chevron
  • When tapped, it should take you back to the IOUReport

Offline tests

Run above test, coming online to send and receive the rerquest/settle updates. We will likely handle any issues here as follow-up issues

QA Steps

Run above tests

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web Screenshot 2023-05-17 at 10 52 30 Screenshot 2023-05-17 at 10 52 25
Mobile Web - Chrome

Screenshot_20230517_113128

Mobile Web - Safari

Screenshot_20230517_113128

Desktop Screenshot 2023-05-17 at 11 20 31
iOS

Simulator Screen Shot - iPhone 14 - 2023-05-17 at 12 00 36

Android

@cristipaval cristipaval self-assigned this May 4, 2023
@cristipaval cristipaval changed the title Cristi display report preview Display report preview May 4, 2023
@Julesssss Julesssss self-assigned this May 11, 2023
@Julesssss Julesssss changed the title Display report preview [DO NOT MERGE] Display report preview May 11, 2023
@Gonals Gonals self-requested a review May 17, 2023 10:21
@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor

Gonals commented May 17, 2023

Note: Please test with new users, as stale data will likely cause bugs

What are we going to do with existing stale data?

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

What are we going to do with existing stale data?

We have a BulkCQ ready to go: https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/282420

Copy link
Contributor

@Julesssss Julesssss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving @luacmartins's changes

Copy link
Contributor

@Julesssss Julesssss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving @luacmartins's changes

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented May 17, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web image image
Mobile Web - Chrome

My android chrome is stuck for last couple of days I need to figure out how to clear the stale data there

Mobile Web - Safari image
Desktop image image
iOS

test+preview@test.com

Android image

Copy link
Contributor

@Gonals Gonals left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This tests pretty well! Besides the chaos that is the LHN, with all the threads, I like it!

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented May 17, 2023

@cristipaval Is the testing steps outdated or this is a bug? The IOUPreview is not shown in chat report it's only shown in iou report.

Screenshot from 2023-05-17 11-52-45

Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great job everyone, tests well

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt the IOU preview should be only in the IOU report.

The report preview will be in the chat

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented May 17, 2023

Can we hold merge for about 1h? I will take a quick look in the code 😁

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

Can we hold merge for about 1h? I will take a quick look in the code 😁

@s77rt we're probably going to merge as it's super critical. But please still review, we can create new issues for any follow ups

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 8d650c6 into main May 17, 2023
@mountiny mountiny deleted the cristi_display-report-preview branch May 17, 2023 11:24
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2023
Display report preview using new reportAction data source

(cherry picked from commit 8d650c6)
OSBotify added a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall code looks code. I have just few minor notes.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor: We have an unnecessary mt4

value: {
...(isNewChatReport ? {[chatCreatedAction.reportActionID]: chatCreatedAction} : {}),
[reportPreviewAction.reportActionID]: {
...(isNewReportPreviewAction ? reportPreviewAction : {created: DateUtils.getDBTime()}),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm, I'm not sure about this. Does it align with the deign docs? We are updating the created value of the action. Can we update another timestamp field?

Comment on lines +234 to +236
[reportPreviewAction.reportActionID]: {
created: reportPreviewAction.created,
},
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be wrapped in a condition if !isNewReportPreviewAction.

@@ -1427,6 +1427,29 @@ function buildOptimisticIOUReportAction(type, amount, currency, comment, partici
};
}

function buildOptimisticReportPreview(reportID, iouReportID, payeeAccountID) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Missing jsdoc. (Why lint is not failing here?)

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.3.15-1 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 1.3.15-12 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.28-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.28-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

}
: {}),
[reportPreviewAction.reportActionID]: {
created: reportPreviewAction.created,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like this caused a regression fixed in this issue: #29954 - the errors property was missing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants