Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix skeleton loading forever on options list when offline #18788

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 14, 2023

Conversation

aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif commented May 11, 2023

Details

show skeleton when personal details are not ready or
old logic: while loading reports data
new logic: only when reports data doesn't exist, no matter loading or not

Fixed Issues

$ #18781
PROPOSAL: Coming from https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1683821308209489?thread_ts=1683794916.311659&cid=C049HHMV9SM

Tests

  1. Login any account
  2. Open one of Search/New chat/New group pages
  3. Observe you can see possible contacts
  4. Go offline > online > quickly offline
  5. Verify that you can still see possible contacts instead of skeleton
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as Tests

QA Steps

Same as Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-05-11.at.7.31.14.PM.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
mchrome.mov
Mobile Web - Safari
msafari.mov
Desktop
desktop.mov
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mov

@aimane-chnaif aimane-chnaif requested a review from a team as a code owner May 11, 2023 18:32
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from parasharrajat and PauloGasparSv and removed request for a team May 11, 2023 18:32
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 11, 2023

@PauloGasparSv @parasharrajat One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc: @amyevans for review

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ ⚠️ Heads up! This pull request has the CP Staging label ⚠️ ⚠️
If you applied the CP Staging label before the PR was merged, the PR will be be immediately deployed to staging even if the open StagingDeployCash deploy checklist is locked.
However if you applied the CP Staging after the PR was merged it's possible it won't be CP'ed automatically. If you need it to be CP'ed to staging, tag a member of @Expensify/mobile-deployers to CP it manually, otherwise you can wait for it to go out with the next deploy.

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

PauloGasparSv commented May 11, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-05-11.at.17.51.30.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-05-11.at.17.54.41.mov
Mobile Web - Safari

N/A can't test offline behavior correctly in the dev Simulator

Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-05-11.at.17.58.56.mov
iOS

N/A can't test offline behavior correctly in the dev Simulator

Android
Screen.Recording.2023-05-11.at.18.00.01.mov

@amyevans amyevans self-requested a review May 11, 2023 18:41
@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

@aimane-chnaif can you add the screenshots for all platforms?

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif can you add the screenshots for all platforms?

doing them right now

amyevans
amyevans previously approved these changes May 11, 2023
@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor Author

@PauloGasparSv @amyevans ready for review 🚀

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Do you need the C+ review here?

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

Do you need the C+ review here?

Please do if that's possible @rushatgabhane!

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented May 11, 2023

Its me @parasharrajat Why everyone is tagging Rushat instead of me? 🤔

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

PauloGasparSv commented May 11, 2023

Its me @parasharrajat Why everyone is tagging Rushat instead of me? 🤔

So sorry for that @parasharrajat 🤦
(And @rushatgabhane too for the pings)

PauloGasparSv
PauloGasparSv previously approved these changes May 11, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@PauloGasparSv PauloGasparSv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, all yours @parasharrajat

src/libs/ReportUtils.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

I couldn't pick it up yesterday as it was very late for me. Checking it now.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@aimane-chnaif can you please explain to me what has been done over this PR and what are we trying to change here?

@aimane-chnaif
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aimane-chnaif can you please explain to me what has been done over this PR and what are we trying to change here?

Full discussion is in https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1683821308209489?thread_ts=1683794916.311659&cid=C049HHMV9SM

Before this PR:
We showed skeleton

  • when personal details are not fetched (as soon as login) - empty or has data without login key
  • or while loading reports data (OpenApp or ReconnectApp)

This PR updates logic:
We will show skeleton

login key check is needed to fix crash, the root cause is well explained in proposals in that issue
reportID check is needed because there might be draft reports (not actual reports)

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

Still LGTM

Bump @parasharrajat @amyevans I think we should get 1+ review and tests on this before merging : )

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

reviewing now

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

I couldn't repro the original issue on staging web but still reviewing this PR now anyway

Copy link
Contributor

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Memo:

This PR uses ReportUtils::isReportDataReady instead of isLoadingReportData from the Onyx data so that data can be displayed when the data cannot be fetched under the offline condition.

Review:

All search pages display search results updated correctly. LGTM!

I haven't tested the changes on my local machine yet. Once I'm done with it, I'll merge the PR

@PauloGasparSv
Copy link
Contributor

Thks @hayata-suenaga!!!

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

tested well! 🚀

Screen.Recording.2023-05-13.at.6.03.10.PM.mov

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga merged commit 365f43c into Expensify:main May 14, 2023
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2023
fix skeleton loading forever on options list when offline

(cherry picked from commit 365f43c)
mountiny added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2023
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/hayata-suenaga in version: 1.3.13-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 cancelled 🔪
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

ios was deployed also in the 13-5 version so I cancelled the workflow which was stuck

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.13-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.28-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 1.3.28-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants