Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/16184 base options selector refactoring #31606

Merged

Conversation

Piotrfj
Copy link
Contributor

@Piotrfj Piotrfj commented Nov 21, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #16184
PROPOSAL: #16184 (comment)

Tests

  1. Open any place that has options selections, like search page
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

  1. Open any place that has options selections, like search page

QA Steps

  1. Open any place that has options selections, like search page
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Kapture.2024-01-09.at.16.41.22.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Kapture.2024-01-10.at.23.25.12.mp4

@Piotrfj Piotrfj requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2023 09:20
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from thienlnam and removed request for a team November 21, 2023 09:20
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 21, 2023

@thienlnam Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

Hey! Can you please make link the associated issue in the PR description next time? That's required for our automation to auto-assign the correct people to review the PR - thanks!

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

Also, looks like we have some merge conflicts

Comment on lines 155 to 156
const enterSubscription = useRef();
const CTRLEnterSubscription = useRef();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we need this. Just define it inside useEffect only.

@Piotrfj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Piotrfj commented Nov 29, 2023

Update: today im on sick leave, have everything almost finished, will provide proposal with fixes tomorrow

@Piotrfj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Piotrfj commented Dec 1, 2023

Finishing testings today

…4-BaseOptionsSelector-refactoring

# Conflicts:
#	src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js
@koko57
Copy link
Contributor

koko57 commented Dec 4, 2023

@Piotrfj FYI: after Theme Switching migration we no longer import styles like this: import styles from '@styles/styles'; we use useThemeStyles hook - you can check how it's done here: https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/31034/files

…4-BaseOptionsSelector-refactoring

# Conflicts:
#	src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js
@koko57
Copy link
Contributor

koko57 commented Dec 8, 2023

@thienlnam @shubham1206agra kindly asking for re-review 🙏🏻

Comment on lines 228 to 320
const subscribeToKeyboardShortcut = () => {
const enterConfig = CONST.KEYBOARD_SHORTCUTS.ENTER;
this.unsubscribeEnter = KeyboardShortcut.subscribe(
enterSubscription.current = KeyboardShortcut.subscribe(
enterConfig.shortcutKey,
this.selectFocusedOption,
selectFocusedOption,
enterConfig.descriptionKey,
enterConfig.modifiers,
true,
() => !this.state.allOptions[this.state.focusedIndex],
() => !allOptions[focusedIndex],
);

const CTRLEnterConfig = CONST.KEYBOARD_SHORTCUTS.CTRL_ENTER;
this.unsubscribeCTRLEnter = KeyboardShortcut.subscribe(
CTRLEnterSubscription.current = KeyboardShortcut.subscribe(
CTRLEnterConfig.shortcutKey,
() => {
if (this.props.canSelectMultipleOptions) {
this.props.onConfirmSelection();
if (props.canSelectMultipleOptions) {
props.onConfirmSelection();
return;
}

const focusedOption = this.state.allOptions[this.state.focusedIndex];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use useKeyboardShortcut hook instead

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

@thienlnam Should we deprecate the use of shouldDelayFocus prop inside this component? Since we have useAutoFocusInput hook being used in most place already

@koko57
Copy link
Contributor

koko57 commented Dec 11, 2023

@shubham1206agra @thienlnam I'm taking over this PR while @Piotrfj is ooo. If you'll request some other changes let me know 🙂

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

This is happening on staging as well. Approving.

Copy link
Contributor

@allroundexperts allroundexperts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@allroundexperts
Copy link
Contributor

@thienlnam Can we please merge this before new conflicts come up again?

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

The performance tests are failing - and it seems to be from this PR

Processing 4 measurements...
Processing measurement 1: [OptionsSelector] should render text input with interactions
Error: Render count difference exceeded the allowed deviation of 0. Current difference: 1

If I merge this, all PRs will start failing this check. @Piotrfj / @koko57 Are you able to take a look at this?

@Piotrfj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Piotrfj commented Feb 26, 2024

@thienlnam #31606 (comment)

@thienlnam thienlnam merged commit fd42ec8 into Expensify:main Feb 26, 2024
15 of 16 checks passed
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Feb 26, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 26, 2024

@thienlnam looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@thienlnam
Copy link
Contributor

#31606 (comment)

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.4.44-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

const {translate} = useLocalize();
const themeStyles = useThemeStyles();

const getInitiallyFocusedIndex = useCallback(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my experience, if you're using useCallback for a generator function that's only used once, you probably should use useMemo instead. I think that results in simpler code:

diff --git a/src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js b/src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js
index 23451b8e1a..a182753387 100755
--- a/src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js
+++ b/src/components/OptionsSelector/BaseOptionsSelector.js
@@ -58,27 +58,6 @@ function BaseOptionsSelector(props) {
     const {translate} = useLocalize();
     const themeStyles = useThemeStyles();
 
-    const getInitiallyFocusedIndex = useCallback(
-        (allOptions) => {
-            let defaultIndex;
-            if (props.shouldTextInputAppearBelowOptions) {
-                defaultIndex = allOptions.length;
-            } else if (props.focusedIndex >= 0) {
-                defaultIndex = props.focusedIndex;
-            } else {
-                defaultIndex = props.selectedOptions.length;
-            }
-            if (_.isUndefined(props.initiallyFocusedOptionKey)) {
-                return defaultIndex;
-            }
-
-            const indexOfInitiallyFocusedOption = _.findIndex(allOptions, (option) => option.keyForList === props.initiallyFocusedOptionKey);
-
-            return indexOfInitiallyFocusedOption;
-        },
-        [props.shouldTextInputAppearBelowOptions, props.initiallyFocusedOptionKey, props.selectedOptions.length, props.focusedIndex],
-    );
-
     const isWebOrDesktop = [CONST.PLATFORM.DESKTOP, CONST.PLATFORM.WEB].includes(getPlatform());
     const accessibilityRoles = _.values(CONST.ROLE);
 
@@ -137,7 +116,24 @@ function BaseOptionsSelector(props) {
     // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps
     const initialAllOptions = useMemo(() => flattenSections(), []);
     const [allOptions, setAllOptions] = useState(initialAllOptions);
-    const [focusedIndex, setFocusedIndex] = useState(getInitiallyFocusedIndex(initialAllOptions));
+
+    const initialFocusedIndex = useMemo(() => {
+        if (!_.isUndefined(props.initiallyFocusedOptionKey)) {
+            return _.findIndex(allOptions, (option) => option.keyForList === props.initiallyFocusedOptionKey);
+        }
+
+        let defaultIndex;
+        if (props.shouldTextInputAppearBelowOptions) {
+            defaultIndex = allOptions.length;
+        } else if (props.focusedIndex >= 0) {
+            defaultIndex = props.focusedIndex;
+        } else {
+            defaultIndex = props.selectedOptions.length;
+        }
+        return defaultIndex;
+        // eslint-disable-next-line react-hooks/exhaustive-deps -- this value is only used to initialize state so only ever needs to be computed on the first render
+    }, []);
+    const [focusedIndex, setFocusedIndex] = useState(initialFocusedIndex);
     const [focusedOption, setFocusedOption] = useState(allOptions[focusedIndex]);
 
     /**

} else if (props.focusedIndex >= 0) {
defaultIndex = props.focusedIndex;
} else {
defaultIndex = props.selectedOptions.length;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

regression: if the length of selectedOptions is 0 then we get this bug #37239. In the diff I posted above, we default it to -1 instead of 0.

[props.shouldTextInputAppearBelowOptions, props.initiallyFocusedOptionKey, props.selectedOptions.length, props.focusedIndex],
);

const isWebOrDesktop = [CONST.PLATFORM.DESKTOP, CONST.PLATFORM.WEB].includes(getPlatform());
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I know you didn't add this, but it's not in compliance with our established code patterns for platform-specific code.


setSections(newSections);
setAllOptions(newOptions);
setFocusedIndex(prevFocusedOptionIndex || (_.isNumber(props.focusedIndex) ? props.focusedIndex : newFocusedIndex));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since this was moved into an effect on sections, it's run on the initial render and incorrectly sets the focused index to 0 when it should be 1. That's causing this regression #37238.

More explanation posted here.

@youssef-lr
Copy link
Contributor

This seems to have caused this, @allroundexperts @Piotrfj in the future please if a base component is touched, please make sure to test all the pages that are using it. I haven't seen the NewChatPage in your recordings.

@Piotrfj
Copy link
Contributor Author

Piotrfj commented Feb 27, 2024

Working on the regressions

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

FYI this was reverted: #37454

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.4.44-13 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@ishpaul777
Copy link
Contributor

Unfortunately, This PR was reverted becuase of multiple regressions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.