Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify optimistic data to support new text+attachment messages #39007

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 11, 2024

Conversation

tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen commented Mar 26, 2024

Details

Now that text and attachments are combined into a single report action, the optimistic data needed to change slightly to account for it.

Fixed Issues

$ #35977

Tests

  1. Open a chat with someone
  2. Send a text-only comment
  3. Verify only a single report action is created
  4. Send an attachment only comment
  5. Verify only a single report action is created
  6. Send a comment with text and attachment (eg. copy/paste an image into the composer after you have typed a message)
  7. Verify only a single report action is created
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

Same as above, but also perform this test:

  1. Go into a public room
  2. Send the text "Unsubscribe" and also add an attachment to the message
  3. Verify that you are unsubscribed from the room and that the attachment is not posted
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome - Note: I was unable to test this due to a broken emulator
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

image

Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native

image

iOS: mWeb Safari

image

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

image

MacOS: Desktop

image

@tgolen tgolen changed the title Modify optimistic data to support new text+attachment messages [HOLD Web-Expensify/pull/41449] Modify optimistic data to support new text+attachment messages Mar 28, 2024
@tgolen tgolen self-assigned this Mar 29, 2024
@tgolen tgolen changed the title [HOLD Web-Expensify/pull/41449] Modify optimistic data to support new text+attachment messages [HOLD Web-Expensify/pull/41449] Apr 4, 2024
@tgolen tgolen marked this pull request as ready for review April 4, 2024 16:45
@tgolen tgolen requested a review from a team as a code owner April 4, 2024 16:45
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team April 4, 2024 16:46
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 4, 2024

@rayane-djouah Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from rayane-djouah April 4, 2024 16:46
@tgolen tgolen changed the title [HOLD Web-Expensify/pull/41449] Modify optimistic data to support new text+attachment messages Apr 4, 2024
@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Apr 7, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack. https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1712805356614479
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Recording.2024-04-11.040747.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Recording.2024-04-11.010729.mp4
iOS: Native
Recording.2024-04-11.005714.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Recording.2024-04-11.010117.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Recording.2024-04-11.005037.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Recording.2024-04-11.004727.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Apr 8, 2024

Bug 1:

Steps:

  1. open a report
  2. Write a draft message (text: "This is an image").
  3. Add an attachment and send

Expected result:

LHN shows the report subtitle as "This is an image [Attachment]"

Actual Result:

LHN shows the report subtitle as "[Attachment]"

Screenshots/Videos

Recording.2024-04-08.012818.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Apr 8, 2024

Bug 2:

Not reproducible on main.
I'm able to reproducible it only on Firefox. Not sure about the steps.

Edit: reproduced on chrome with a new account.

Steps:

  1. open a report
  2. Write a draft message
  3. Add an attachment and send; refresh immediately after clicking send

Result:

AddTextAndAttachment fails with a 404 error and retries endlessly.
After some time, a red dot error appears with an unexpected error message.

Screenshots/Videos

Recording.2024-04-08.011255.mp4

Screenshot 2024-04-08 011338

Recording.2024-04-08.020823.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Apr 8, 2024

Bug 3:

It is also reproducible on main NAB for this PR.

Steps:

  1. open a report
  2. Write a draft message (optional step).
  3. Add an attachment and send; refresh immediately after clicking send

Result:

"Auth CreateReportAction returned an error.

Screenshots/Videos

Recording.2024-04-08.010220.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Apr 8, 2024

Bug 4:

It is also reproducible on main NAB for this PR.

Steps:

  1. open a report
  2. Write a draft message.
  3. Add an attachment and send

Result:

Console error:
Warning: flushSync was called from inside a lifecycle method. React cannot flush when React is already rendering. Consider moving this call to a scheduler task or micro task.

Screenshots/Videos

Screenshot 2024-04-08 005451

Recording.2024-04-08.005357.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Apr 8, 2024

Bug 5:

Steps:

  1. open a report
  2. Write a draft message.
  3. Add this an empty (0 kb file) video attachment and send:

Expected result:

The file link shows in a new line

Actual Result:

The file link is concatenated with the message.

Screenshots/Videos

Recording.2024-04-08.014159.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Apr 8, 2024

Bug 6:

Steps:

  1. open a report
  2. Write a draft message ("Hello").
  3. Add an attachment and send
  4. Right-click on the sent text+image message and click copy to clipboard.
  5. Paste the clipboard content

Expected result:

We have three options:

  1. Text should be Hello [Attachment]
  2. or:
    Hello![Filename](url)
  3. or (actual result):
    Hello![url](url)

I think that we can also add a space/new line between the message and the image markdown.

Actual Result:

Copied text is:
Hello![https://staging.expensify.com/chat-attachments/8511954859736692126/w_ece86a3bdecdde82bc45421e4d087841a754dd92.png.1024.jpg](https://staging.expensify.com/chat-attachments/8511954859736692126/w_ece86a3bdecdde82bc45421e4d087841a754dd92.png.1024.jpg)

Screenshots/Videos

Recording.2024-04-08.014605.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Apr 8, 2024

Bug 7:

Steps:

  1. open a report
  2. Write a draft message.
  3. Add an attachment and send
  4. Right-click on the sent message and click edit

Expected result:

User is able to edit the message.

Actual Result:

App crashes with a console error:
Uncaught Error: Invalid HTML: unclosed tags

Screenshots/Videos

Recording.2024-04-08.021659.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

rayane-djouah commented Apr 8, 2024

Please sync with main, as the branch is +2k commits behind.

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

Bug 8:

Steps:

  1. open a report
  2. Write a draft message.
  3. Add an attachment and send
  4. Right-click on the sent message or view the mini context menu

Expected result:

Users can click on a download option to download the attachment.

Actual Result:

There is no download option in text+image messages.

Screenshots/Videos

Recording.2024-04-08.022607.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

Bug 9:

Steps:

  1. open a report
  2. Write a draft message with markdown.
  3. Add an attachment and send

Expected result:

Markdown is applied to the sent message.

Actual Result:

Markdown is not applied to the sent message.

Screenshots/Videos

Recording.2024-04-08.023453.mp4

@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

"Android: mWeb Chrome" Screenshot/Video is missing in author checklist

Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please check the above reported bugs. Thank you!

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Apr 10, 2024

Current progress:

  • Bug 1: ✅ Can only be fixed on the server, I'll open an issue to get it fixed (GH)
  • Bug 2: ✅ Reproducible on main (anytime you refresh while the image is uploading this will happen, it's OK)
  • Bug 3: ✅ Reproducible on main
  • Bug 4: ✅ Reproducible on main
  • Bug 5: ✅ Empty file is too much of an edge case

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor Author

tgolen commented Apr 10, 2024

  • Bug 6: ✅ This is being handled in some of the other front-end tasks for the markdown side of this feature
  • Bug 7: ✅ Unable to reproduce
  • Bug 8: ✅ This is not really a bug and will also be handled with some of the other front-end tasks concerning the image carousel
  • Bug 9: ✅ Unable to reproduce

I updated the branch with main before testing any of these, so some of them might have been resolved in main. Regarding the missing screenshot, I noted above in the platform test checkmarks:

mWeb Chrome - Note: I was unable to test this due to a broken emulator

If you're able to test it there, then I think this is OK. We should be all set here!

Copy link
Contributor

@rayane-djouah rayane-djouah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from johnmlee101 April 11, 2024 03:24
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 11, 2024

@johnmlee101 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

Copy link
Contributor

@johnmlee101 johnmlee101 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

@johnmlee101 johnmlee101 merged commit 2e1dd1d into main Apr 11, 2024
16 checks passed
@johnmlee101 johnmlee101 deleted the tgolen-improve-attachmentmessage branch April 11, 2024 18:24
@rayane-djouah
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen, Can you please assign me in the linked issue? Thank you!

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/johnmlee101 in version: 1.4.63-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.63-21 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

textForNewComment = parser.htmlToText(htmlForNewComment);
} else {
htmlForNewComment = `${commentText}\n${CONST.ATTACHMENT_UPLOADING_MESSAGE_HTML}`;
textForNewComment = `${commentText}\n${CONST.ATTACHMENT_UPLOADING_MESSAGE_HTML}`;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here, we missed decoding the html encoded text using parser.htmlToText because of which html encoded text was displayed temporarily. This caused issue #40578

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants