Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix multiple open report call when report screen is mounted #40624

Merged

Conversation

bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor

@bernhardoj bernhardoj commented Apr 20, 2024

Details

We call OpenReport in both ReportScreen and ReportActionsView. This PR fix it.

Fixed Issues

$ #39673
PROPOSAL: #39673 (comment)

Tests

Same as QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as QA Steps

QA Steps

Web/Desktop

  1. Open developer tools
  2. Switch to the Network tab
  3. Sign out and sign in
  4. Wait until the app load completes
  5. In the network tab, verify there is only 1 OpenReport call

Android/iOS/mWeb

  1. Open developer tools (not available in Android/iOS)
  2. Switch to the Network tab
  3. Open any report
  4. In the network tab, verify there is only 1 OpenReport call
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-04-20.at.14.02.00.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-04-20.at.14.06.15.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-04-20.at.13.58.34.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-04-20.at.13.59.27.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-04-20.at.13.52.31.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-04-20.at.13.54.01.mov

@bernhardoj bernhardoj requested a review from a team as a code owner April 20, 2024 06:12
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team April 20, 2024 06:12
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 20, 2024

@abdulrahuman5196 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

On a small screen, logging in won't call OpenReport since there is no report screen mounted which is different with a large screen. So, I only test opening some reports and verify the OpenReport call is still only called once.

I still saw some reports not making OpenReport API call with the mentioned changes

@abdulrahuman5196 can you tell me how to reproduce this? so I can take a look. Thanks!

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Checking now

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

abdulrahuman5196 commented Apr 24, 2024

On a small screen, logging in won't call OpenReport since there is no report screen mounted which is different with a large screen. So, I only test opening some reports and verify the OpenReport call is still only called once.

I still saw some reports not making OpenReport API call with the mentioned changes

@abdulrahuman5196 can you tell me how to reproduce this? so I can take a look. Thanks!

I didn't see this issue yesterday. Will check again and approve if no other issues.

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Screen.Recording.2024-04-26.at.9.57.18.PM.mov

For some reports I am still seeing OpenReport being called twice after fresh signin. I suspect reports with partial skeleton loading is still calling OpenReport twice. Could you check on this @bernhardoj ?

@bernhardoj
Copy link
Contributor Author

bernhardoj commented Apr 27, 2024

Looks like it's coming from this temporary code

useEffect(() => {
// Temporary solution for handling REPORT_PREVIEW. More details: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C035J5C9FAP/p1705417778466539?thread_ts=1705035404.136629&cid=C035J5C9FAP
// This code should be removed once REPORT_PREVIEW is no longer repositioned.
// We need to call openReport for gaps created by moving REPORT_PREVIEW, which causes mismatches in previousReportActionID and reportActionID of adjacent reportActions. The server returns the correct sequence, allowing us to overwrite incorrect data with the correct one.
const shouldOpenReport =
newestReportAction?.actionName === CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.REPORT_PREVIEW &&
!hasCreatedAction &&
isReadyForCommentLinking &&
reportActions.length < 24 &&
reportActions.length >= 1 &&
!isLoadingInitialReportActions &&
!isLoadingOlderReportActions &&
!isLoadingNewerReportActions;
if (shouldOpenReport) {
Report.openReport(reportID, reportActionID);
}

From your video, I can see at least 2 satisfied conditions,
newestReportAction?.actionName === CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.REPORT_PREVIEW
and
!hasCreatedAction

I think we can ignore it for now since it's a temporary code and the author already commented that it will be removed in the future.

Btw, idk how to reproduce it

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like it's coming from this temporary code

useEffect(() => {
// Temporary solution for handling REPORT_PREVIEW. More details: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C035J5C9FAP/p1705417778466539?thread_ts=1705035404.136629&cid=C035J5C9FAP
// This code should be removed once REPORT_PREVIEW is no longer repositioned.
// We need to call openReport for gaps created by moving REPORT_PREVIEW, which causes mismatches in previousReportActionID and reportActionID of adjacent reportActions. The server returns the correct sequence, allowing us to overwrite incorrect data with the correct one.
const shouldOpenReport =
newestReportAction?.actionName === CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.REPORT_PREVIEW &&
!hasCreatedAction &&
isReadyForCommentLinking &&
reportActions.length < 24 &&
reportActions.length >= 1 &&
!isLoadingInitialReportActions &&
!isLoadingOlderReportActions &&
!isLoadingNewerReportActions;
if (shouldOpenReport) {
Report.openReport(reportID, reportActionID);
}

From your video, I can see at least 2 satisfied conditions, newestReportAction?.actionName === CONST.REPORT.ACTIONS.TYPE.REPORT_PREVIEW and !hasCreatedAction

I think we can ignore it for now since it's a temporary code and the author already commented that it will be removed in the future.

Btw, idk how to reproduce it

Got it. Verified and seems its the cause.

@abdulrahuman5196
Copy link
Contributor

abdulrahuman5196 commented Apr 29, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-04-29.at.5.33.34.PM.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-04-29.at.5.37.29.PM.mp4
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-04-29.at.5.27.56.PM.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-04-29.at.5.30.06.PM.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-04-29.at.5.15.14.PM.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-04-29.at.5.17.58.PM.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@abdulrahuman5196 abdulrahuman5196 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes looks good and works well. Reviewers checklist is also complete.

All yours. @flodnv

🎀 👀 🎀
C+ Reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from flodnv April 29, 2024 12:22
@flodnv flodnv merged commit c343552 into Expensify:main Apr 29, 2024
17 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 1.4.67-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/flodnv in version: 1.4.68-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 1.4.67-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

francoisl added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
…ultiple-open-report"

This reverts commit c343552, reversing
changes made to c4d9d4e.
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2 labels Apr 30, 2024
yuwenmemon added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
[CP Staging] Revert PR #40624, fix flickering when switching from task to parent
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
[CP Staging] Revert PR #40624, fix flickering when switching from task to parent

(cherry picked from commit 221f850)
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 1, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 1.4.68-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 1, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/flodnv in version: 1.4.69-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@kbecciv
Copy link

kbecciv commented May 1, 2024

This PR is failing because of issue #39673

The issue is tested in: Web, mWeb and Desktop

1714550211587.Screen_Recording_2024-05-01_at_10.52.39_in_the_morning.mp4
1714550449687.Screen_Recording_2024-05-01_at_10.59.20_in_the_morning.mp4
1714550449687.Screen_Recording_2024-05-01_at_10.59.20_in_the_morning.1.mp4

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented May 2, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.4.69-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants