Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable / Disable multi level tags #42315

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga commented May 16, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #42314
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests / QA Steps

  1. Enable tags on a workspace
  2. Create several tags. Confirm that bulk enable and disable works by checking the top checkbox and clicking the Selected button.
  3. Enable the accounting feature and connect to QBO.
  4. Go back to the Tags screen and check that Classes and Customers/Projects are now imported as tags
  5. Click Classes. Click the top checkbox. Click the Selected button and click Disable
  6. Check that all tags in Classes are disabled
  7. Do the same thing but enable tags this time. Check that all tags in Classes are enabled back.
  8. Click Customers/Projects. Do the same thing as above. Confirm that they work.

Offline tests

Follow the same steps from Step 1 to Step 2 offline and confirm it works
Do Step 3 while the device is online
Follow Step 4 to Step 8 offline and confirm it works

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
    Tested this on web desktop
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-05-16.at.11.57.38.AM.mov
MacOS: Desktop

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga requested a review from s77rt May 16, 2024 18:59
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga self-assigned this May 16, 2024
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2024 18:59
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team May 16, 2024 18:59
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 16, 2024

@Ollyws @ One of you needs to copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from Ollyws May 16, 2024 18:59
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the title Enable / Disable multi level tags [HOLD Merge Freeze] Enable / Disable multi level tags May 16, 2024
src/libs/actions/Policy.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
* When the tags are imported as multi level tags, the index of the top
* most tag list item
*/
tagListIndex?: number;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same ^

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented May 17, 2024

@hayata-suenaga Can we merge this PR first #42149? So we can cover the setWorkspaceTagEnabled call in TagSettingsPage

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the base branch from main to qbo-freeze-branch May 21, 2024 00:32
@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga changed the title [HOLD Merge Freeze] Enable / Disable multi level tags Enable / Disable multi level tags May 21, 2024
@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

Changed the base branch to the QBO freeze branch. We can merge there anytime

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga requested a review from s77rt May 21, 2024 00:33
@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented May 21, 2024

Can you please fix the lint issue

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

ah I didn't realize that. thank you for letting me know 😄 I'll update my PR

Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code looks good. Testing...

@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ describe('actions/Policy', () => {
Onyx.set(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.POLICY_TAGS}${fakePolicy.id}`, fakePolicyTags);
})
.then(() => {
Policy.setWorkspaceTagEnabled(fakePolicy.id, tagsToUpdate);
Policy.setWorkspaceTagEnabled(fakePolicy.id, tagsToUpdate, fakePolicyTags[0].orderWeight);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Policy.setWorkspaceTagEnabled(fakePolicy.id, tagsToUpdate, fakePolicyTags[0].orderWeight);
Policy.setWorkspaceTagEnabled(fakePolicy.id, tagsToUpdate, fakePolicyTags[tagListName].orderWeight);

@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ describe('actions/Policy', () => {
.then(() => {
mockFetch?.fail?.();

Policy.setWorkspaceTagEnabled(fakePolicy.id, tagsToUpdate);
Policy.setWorkspaceTagEnabled(fakePolicy.id, tagsToUpdate, fakePolicyTags[0].orderWeight);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Policy.setWorkspaceTagEnabled(fakePolicy.id, tagsToUpdate, fakePolicyTags[0].orderWeight);
Policy.setWorkspaceTagEnabled(fakePolicy.id, tagsToUpdate, fakePolicyTags[tagListName].orderWeight);

@s77rt
Copy link
Contributor

s77rt commented May 22, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome

Networking issue

iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
mweb-safari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@s77rt s77rt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fix the test and :shipit:

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from arosiclair May 22, 2024 18:42
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 22, 2024

@arosiclair Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@trjExpensify trjExpensify removed the request for review from Ollyws May 23, 2024 10:57
Copy link
Contributor

@arosiclair arosiclair left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't have much context but LGTM

@arosiclair arosiclair merged commit f827cdb into qbo-freeze-branch May 23, 2024
16 checks passed
@arosiclair arosiclair deleted the hayata-call-api-for-multi-level-tags branch May 23, 2024 16:56
lakchote pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
…vel-tags

Enable / Disable multi level tags
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 1.4.77-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/arosiclair in version: 1.4.77-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@hayata-suenaga hayata-suenaga mentioned this pull request May 31, 2024
49 tasks
@kavimuru
Copy link

kavimuru commented Jun 2, 2024

@hayata-suenaga #42315 failing with #42314 in desktophttps://platform.applause.com/services/links/v1/external/03a18aec5fd806bbc900f164f8aeea0f398fff1b91024577f20675ea458b776d

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kavimuru thank you for letting me know is the issue only happening on desktop?

@kavimuru
Copy link

kavimuru commented Jun 3, 2024

@hayata-suenaga This is happening only in desktop, retested.

Screen.Recording.2024-06-03.at.6.54.05.in.the.evening.mp4

@hayata-suenaga
Copy link
Contributor Author

I believe this is a pusher related issue. will post this in Slack

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 4, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 1.4.78-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jun 6, 2024

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 1.4.79-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants