Add handling of the NetSuite beta in NewDot #44064

yuwenmemon · 2024-06-20T05:19:27Z

@mananjadhav please review
cc @mountiny

Details

Adds logic to filter out the NetSuite integration if you're not on the beta.

Fixed Issues

None, but discussed here: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C06ML6X0W9L/p1718837727812639

Tests/QA

None, will be handled in [HOLD for payment 2024-07-10] [#Wave-Control: Add NetSuite] Settings Configuration in NewDot: Top-Level Subsidiary Selector #43435

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  - If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

MacOS: Desktop

melvin-bot · 2024-06-20T05:19:55Z

@dangrous Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

mananjadhav · 2024-06-20T11:34:29Z

src/CONST.ts

@@ -1798,6 +1799,7 @@ const CONST = {
                // Here we will add other connections names when we add support for them
                QBO: 'quickbooksOnline',
                XERO: 'xero',
+                NETSUITE: 'netsuite',


question, I was confused if we should use NETSUITE as single word or NET_SUITE underscore separated.

one word should be fine I believe

dangrous

Code looks fine! though we're getting a typecheck error, not sure why that's related at this point though...

dangrous · 2024-06-20T16:21:10Z

src/CONST.ts

@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@ const CONST = {
        SPOTNANA_TRAVEL: 'spotnanaTravel',
        ACCOUNTING_ON_NEW_EXPENSIFY: 'accountingOnNewExpensify',
        XERO_ON_NEW_EXPENSIFY: 'xeroOnNewExpensify',
+        NETSUITE_ON_NEW_EXPENSIFY: 'netsuiteOnNewExpensify',


NAB - should this be netSuite instead of netsuite?

Nah this matches the casing on Web-E

dangrous · 2024-06-20T16:21:14Z

src/CONST.ts

@@ -1798,6 +1799,7 @@ const CONST = {
                // Here we will add other connections names when we add support for them
                QBO: 'quickbooksOnline',
                XERO: 'xero',
+                NETSUITE: 'netsuite',


one word should be fine I believe

mananjadhav · 2024-06-20T17:30:03Z

@yuwenmemon Can you fix the lint issues?

yuwenmemon · 2024-06-20T20:36:18Z

src/libs/actions/connections/index.ts

+    if (connectionName === CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.NETSUITE) {
+        return !isSyncInProgress && !!policy?.connections?.[CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.NETSUITE].lastErrorSyncDate
+    }


This fixes our Typecheck issue

melvin-bot · 2024-06-20T20:44:35Z

@hayata-suenaga Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

melvin-bot · 2024-06-20T20:44:37Z

🎯 @mananjadhav, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #44121.

mananjadhav · 2024-06-20T20:46:15Z

I'll just do one basic test on Web before completing the checklist.

mananjadhav · 2024-06-20T20:55:11Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Existing other integration

With beta enabled
Note: I have NetSuite data in Onyx but no code, so this is expected to show this way.

MacOS: Desktop

mananjadhav

All yours @dangrous

melvin-bot · 2024-06-20T20:56:08Z

@hayata-suenaga Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

dangrous

LGTM!

OSBotify · 2024-06-20T21:42:29Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

shubham1206agra · 2024-06-21T10:35:24Z

src/libs/actions/connections/index.ts

@@ -236,6 +236,11 @@ function updateManyPolicyConnectionConfigs<TConnectionName extends ConnectionNam
 }

 function hasSynchronizationError(policy: OnyxEntry<Policy>, connectionName: PolicyConnectionName, isSyncInProgress: boolean): boolean {
+    // NetSuite does not use the conventional lastSync object, so we need to check for lastErrorSyncDate
+    if (connectionName === CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.NETSUITE) {
+        return !isSyncInProgress && !!policy?.connections?.[CONST.POLICY.CONNECTIONS.NAME.NETSUITE].lastErrorSyncDate;


@yuwenmemon I think we should have used verified instead of lastErrorSyncDate

No, verified is a different setting that governs whether or not we show the sync button. I actually think we may not need to use it in NewDot at all. It's an old setting for OldDot.

OSBotify · 2024-06-21T21:44:52Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/dangrous in version: 9.0.1-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2024-06-25T19:45:29Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 9.0.1-19 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

brunovjk · 2024-08-30T12:40:30Z

I don't think it was a regression but we should have accounted for verified === false to handle connecting to NetSuite with invalid credentials. To avoid NetSuite - Sync error isn't displayed when connecting to NetSuite with invalid credentials

yuwenmemon · 2024-09-03T21:15:51Z

Thanks @brunovjk for your PR! We've decided to bring NetSuite in line with the other integrations in terms of using the lastSync object in #47493 - so we'll be revisiting this again shortly.

Add beta to handle the NetSuite beta in NewDot

3e3e6bc

yuwenmemon self-assigned this Jun 20, 2024

yuwenmemon requested a review from a team as a code owner June 20, 2024 05:19

yuwenmemon requested a review from mananjadhav June 20, 2024 05:19

melvin-bot bot requested review from dangrous and removed request for a team June 20, 2024 05:19

mananjadhav reviewed Jun 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

dangrous requested changes Jun 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

yuwenmemon added 3 commits June 20, 2024 13:13

Fix conflicts

ac598d4

prettier

fee69ea

Add exception for NetSuite in error checking logic

a1d5ab1

yuwenmemon commented Jun 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

Prettier

9b8cf91

mananjadhav approved these changes Jun 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from hayata-suenaga June 20, 2024 20:44

melvin-bot bot mentioned this pull request Jun 20, 2024

Payment issue for E/App PR#44064 #44121

Closed

mananjadhav approved these changes Jun 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

dangrous approved these changes Jun 20, 2024

View reviewed changes

dangrous merged commit b90ac12 into main Jun 20, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed

dangrous deleted the yuwen-netSuiteBeta branch June 20, 2024 21:34

shubham1206agra reviewed Jun 21, 2024

View reviewed changes

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jun 21, 2024

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-06-21 #44186

Closed

brunovjk mentioned this pull request Aug 30, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2024-08-29] [$250] NetSuite - Sync error isn't displayed when connecting to NetSuite with invalid credentials #46768

Closed

6 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Add handling of the NetSuite beta in NewDot #44064

Add handling of the NetSuite beta in NewDot #44064

yuwenmemon commented Jun 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 20, 2024

mananjadhav Jun 20, 2024

dangrous Jun 20, 2024

dangrous left a comment

dangrous Jun 20, 2024

yuwenmemon Jun 20, 2024

dangrous Jun 20, 2024

mananjadhav commented Jun 20, 2024

yuwenmemon Jun 20, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 20, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 20, 2024

mananjadhav commented Jun 20, 2024

mananjadhav commented Jun 20, 2024

mananjadhav left a comment

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 20, 2024

dangrous left a comment

OSBotify commented Jun 20, 2024

shubham1206agra Jun 21, 2024

yuwenmemon Jun 21, 2024

OSBotify commented Jun 21, 2024

OSBotify commented Jun 25, 2024

brunovjk commented Aug 30, 2024

yuwenmemon commented Sep 3, 2024

Add handling of the NetSuite beta in NewDot #44064

Add handling of the NetSuite beta in NewDot #44064

Conversation

yuwenmemon commented Jun 20, 2024 • edited Loading

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests/QA

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dangrous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

mananjadhav commented Jun 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 20, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 20, 2024

mananjadhav commented Jun 20, 2024

mananjadhav commented Jun 20, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

mananjadhav left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 20, 2024

dangrous left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

OSBotify commented Jun 20, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

OSBotify commented Jun 21, 2024

OSBotify commented Jun 25, 2024

brunovjk commented Aug 30, 2024

yuwenmemon commented Sep 3, 2024

yuwenmemon commented Jun 20, 2024 •

edited

Loading