Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CP Staging] Revert "Add Pay as Business option for invoices sent to an individual who is admin of their primary workspace" #44891

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 5, 2024

Conversation

mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny commented Jul 5, 2024

Reverts #43036

This reverts commit 35ae731, reversing changes made to 9babbda.

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #44818
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Precondition:

  • User A and User B have their own workspace.
  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. [User A] Send an invoice to User B.
  3. [User B] Go to invoice chat.
  4. [User B] Click pay button > Pay the invoice as individual > Pay elsewhere.
  5. [User A] Send another invoice.
  6. [User A] Note that User A can send another invoice.
  7. [User B] Delete all the workspaces.
  8. [User B] Note that app crashes after deleting the workspace.
  9. [User A] Send another invoice to User B in the same workspace chat.
  10. [User A] Note that user cannot send invoice after User B deletes all the workspaces.
  11. [User B] Go to Account settings > Workspaces.
  12. [User B] Note that the workspace list shows blank workspace under Free plan.

Expected Result:

In Step 8, app will not crash after user B deletes all the workspaces.
In Step 10, User A should be able to send another invoice to User B after user B deletes all the workspaces.
In Step 12, there should not be any workspace in the list. (Or a workspace with an error about annual subscription)

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

Same as tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

…s-business"

This reverts commit 35ae731, reversing
changes made to 9babbda.
@mountiny mountiny self-assigned this Jul 5, 2024
@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jul 5, 2024

In test step 4

[User B] Click pay button > Pay the invoice as business > Pay elsewhere.

@mountiny With this revert there would be no Pay the invoice as business option, right?

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor Author

mountiny commented Jul 5, 2024

@c3024 correct so lets just do the steps with pay as individual

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor Author

mountiny commented Jul 5, 2024

Screen.Recording.2024-07-05.at.11.47.19.mp4

@mountiny mountiny marked this pull request as ready for review July 5, 2024 10:52
@mountiny mountiny requested a review from a team as a code owner July 5, 2024 10:52
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team July 5, 2024 10:52
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 5, 2024

@aimane-chnaif Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from aimane-chnaif July 5, 2024 10:52

This comment has been minimized.

@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jul 5, 2024

In Step 12, there should not be any workspace in the list.

Here, there will be at least one workspace with the annual subscription error as seen in the video you shared.

@mountiny mountiny requested review from c3024 and removed request for aimane-chnaif July 5, 2024 13:04
@Expensify Expensify deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 5, 2024

@carlosmiceli carlosmiceli merged commit 0460e0d into main Jul 5, 2024
16 of 20 checks passed
@carlosmiceli carlosmiceli deleted the vit-revert43036 branch July 5, 2024 14:17
OSBotify pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2024
[CP Staging] Revert "Add Pay as Business option for invoices sent to an individual who is admin of their primary workspace"

(cherry picked from commit 0460e0d)
@c3024
Copy link
Contributor

c3024 commented Jul 5, 2024

Testing Videos

Chrome
revertPayChrome.mp4
Desktop
revertPayDesktop.mp4
iOS mWeb
revertPayiOSmWeb.mp4
iOS
revertPayiOS-compressed.mp4
Android mWeb
revertPayAndroidmWeb-compressed.mp4
Android
revertPayAndroid-compressed.mp4

tgolen added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 5, 2024
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 5, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/carlosmiceli in version: 9.0.4-7 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jul 8, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/carlosmiceli in version: 9.0.5-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.0.5-13 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.6-8 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants