Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change "Requestor Information" to "Personal Information" and make requirements clearer in VBA flow #5151

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2021

Conversation

luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@luacmartins luacmartins commented Sep 9, 2021

Details

This PR changes Requestor information to Personal information, as well as updates the URL to the step and adds a clarifying line below the header text.

Fixed Issues

$ #5081

Tests

  1. Login to an account with a Workspace, but without a bank account setup.
  2. Open the VBA flow by clicking on Settings > Select Workspace > Get Started
  3. Fill the form until you get to the Personal information step. You can add these credentials if needed.
  4. Verify that it looks like the screenshots below.

QA Steps

Steps above.

Tested On

  • Web
  • Mobile Web
  • Desktop
  • iOS
  • Android

Screenshots

Web

web

Mobile Web

mWeb

Desktop

desktop

iOS

ios

Android

android

@luacmartins luacmartins requested a review from a team September 9, 2021 00:04
@luacmartins luacmartins self-assigned this Sep 9, 2021
@MelvinBot MelvinBot requested review from Julesssss and removed request for a team September 9, 2021 00:04
@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

What do you think about adding just a little more separation between the blue links and the line above? Maybe try adding mt1 or mt2?

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is how it looks with mt1:
Screen Shot 2021-09-08 at 6 07 12 PM

@shawnborton
Copy link
Contributor

Nice, I like that better! What are your thoughts?

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor Author

It does look better. I'll make the change and update the images. Thanks @shawnborton!

@luacmartins luacmartins requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2021 00:14
@luacmartins luacmartins removed the request for review from a team September 9, 2021 00:14
@luacmartins luacmartins removed the request for review from ctkochan22 September 9, 2021 00:15
<View style={[styles.mb5, styles.mt1, styles.dFlex, styles.flexRow]}>
<TextLink
style={[styles.textMicro]}
// eslint-disable-next-line max-len
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we still need this line? I thought that we increased the max line count.

<Text style={[styles.textMicroSupporting]}>{' | '}</Text>
<TextLink
style={[styles.textMicro, styles.textLink]}
// eslint-disable-next-line max-len
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And here

Copy link
Contributor

@Julesssss Julesssss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good other than the eslint comments, but let's not block N6 on this.

@Julesssss Julesssss merged commit 77dea94 into main Sep 9, 2021
@Julesssss Julesssss deleted the cmartins-requestorInfo branch September 9, 2021 10:31
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 9, 2021

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Sep 9, 2021

🚀 Deployed to staging by @Julesssss in version: 1.0.95-2 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by @roryabraham in version: 1.0.96-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants