Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redirect to feed after completing the bank connection #52016

Conversation

DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

@DylanDylann DylanDylann commented Nov 5, 2024

Explanation of Change

Fixed Issues

$ https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C06ML6X0W9L/p1730461357005019?thread_ts=1729596921.819569&cid=C06ML6X0W9L
PROPOSAL: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C06ML6X0W9L/p1730688809259139?thread_ts=1729596921.819569&cid=C06ML6X0W9L

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Internal QA Steps

  1. Go to Company Card Page
  2. Add new Company Card
  3. Select Chase Bank
  4. Select Direct Feed
  5. Complete the bank connection
  6. Verify that the App navigate to Company Feed Page
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-11-06.at.23.20.11.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-11-07.at.00.21.55.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-11-07.at.00.29.34.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-11-07.at.00.24.13.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-11-06.at.22.32.11.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-11-06.at.22.52.25.mov

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mountiny The PR is up

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dukenv0307 @allgandalf Could you guys help to review this PR? Please comment on this PR and start reviewing soon. Thanks

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please comment on the code change then the Melvin will not get another C+ when I open the PR

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

I can review it

@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

i can help

@mountiny mountiny requested a review from dukenv0307 November 5, 2024 09:11
@DylanDylann DylanDylann marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2024 09:12
@DylanDylann DylanDylann requested a review from a team as a code owner November 5, 2024 09:12
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team November 5, 2024 09:12
@allgandalf
Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 should i review this? i have free cycle

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 5, 2024

@ Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

DylanDylann commented Nov 5, 2024

@dukenv0307 I still trying to test this change. It seems hard to test on dev without an auth connection

cc @mountiny

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dukenv0307 Problem: When users complete the bank account flow, the App doesn't navigate them to Company Feed. This PR will fix this problem

CleanShot.2024-11-01.at.12.40.44.mp4

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Nov 5, 2024

I anticipate this is hard to test locally, sorry there is no way to handle it.

How does the xero connection or other integration connections handle it, i think they must use the same approach

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

I anticipate this is hard to test locally, sorry there is no way to handle it.
How does the xero connection or other integration connections handle it, i think they must use the same approach

This is another flow, and I don't think we can use the same way here. Trying another way

@DylanDylann DylanDylann marked this pull request as draft November 5, 2024 11:27
@DylanDylann DylanDylann force-pushed the redirect-to-feed-after-completing-the-bank-connection branch from 806aa97 to 6069922 Compare November 6, 2024 06:21
@DylanDylann DylanDylann marked this pull request as ready for review November 6, 2024 06:24
@DylanDylann

This comment was marked as outdated.

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mountiny For sure, we need to make a build and reach out to some internal QA who have chase accounts to test this PR

@mountiny mountiny self-requested a review November 6, 2024 12:41

This comment has been minimized.

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

DylanDylann commented Nov 6, 2024

@dukenv0307 There are some updates. We only need to mock this response

        Onyx.set(`${ONYXKEYS.COLLECTION.SHARED_NVP_PRIVATE_DOMAIN_MEMBER}${18600095}`, {
            settings: {
                oAuthAccountDetails: {
                    'oauth.chase.com': {
                        accountList: ['C. DUNBAR...0546', 'J. HAYES...4754', 'K. BAACK...8211', 'L. BORGNINO...9008', 'C. MILES...4129', 'J. BRUSH...8303'],
                        credentials: 'ASDF',
                        expiration: 1730127183,
                    },
                },
            },
        });

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dukenv0307 Please help to review again

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 6, 2024

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/52016/index.html ❌ FAILED ❌
Android The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/52016/NewExpensify.dmg https://52016.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dukenv0307 kindly bump

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

I'm recording the videos

Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 7, 2024

🎯 @dukenv0307, thanks for reviewing and testing this PR! 🎉

An E/App issue has been created to issue payment here: #52169.

@mountiny mountiny added the InternalQA This pull request required internal QA label Nov 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good to me, we will continue improving this code overtime but right now mainly we want to get the connection working smoothly so we can test other flows easier

@JmillsExpensify will help us test this

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 96f5546 into Expensify:main Nov 7, 2024
20 of 24 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Nov 7, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2024

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.0.59-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

@joekaufmanexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

I was able to connect my chase account! I don't have a chase credit card, so I just used my credentials for my chase bank account. There are no cards to assign, but the connection flow worked.

image

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 9.0.59-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 skipped 🚫
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 skipped 🚫

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
InternalQA This pull request required internal QA Ready To Build
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants